Olesia N. Makhutova, Elena V. Borisova, Yulia O. Mashonskaya
{"title":"Two pathways of essential polyunsaturated fatty acid supply from terrestrial invertebrates to fish in small shaded rivers","authors":"Olesia N. Makhutova, Elena V. Borisova, Yulia O. Mashonskaya","doi":"10.1007/s00027-026-01372-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In small shaded forest rivers, autochthonous primary production is limited, creating a deficiency of essential polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) for consumers. Previously, we demonstrated that allochthonous subsidy provides a significant flux of physiologically essential PUFAs into the shaded Krutaya Kacha River. Here, we aimed to reveal the specific terrestrial taxa driving this nutritional subsidy and compare them to aquatic taxa. Discriminant analysis separated aquatic from terrestrial taxa. Aquatic taxa, particularly Ephemeroptera, remained the primary source of physiologically valuable eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA; 20:5n‑3) for fish. Terrestrial phytophagous insects (Hemiptera, Homoptera, Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera, and Coleoptera) were rich in linoleic acid (LIN; 18:2n‑6) and/or alpha‑linolenic acid (ALA; 18:3n‑3) but contained very low levels of EPA and arachidonic acid (ARA; 20:4n‑6). By contrast, terrestrial predators and scavengers, especially Tetragnathidae (spiders) and Carabidae (carabid beetles), showed high EPA and ARA contents, comparable to those of aquatic insects. Spiders contained up to 10.6% EPA and 3.2% ARA, while carabid beetles contained up to 9.4% EPA and 4.0% ARA. Terrestrial invertebrates subsidized essential PUFAs via two discrete pathways: a direct pathway of LIN and/or ALA from terrestrial plants via phytophages and a “boomerang” pathway of ARA and EPA—from aquatic prey to terrestrial predators and scavengers and back into the river. These two pathways may be critical for essential lipid nutrition in shaded rivers occupying vast areas of boreal forests.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55489,"journal":{"name":"Aquatic Sciences","volume":"88 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00027-026-01372-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In small shaded forest rivers, autochthonous primary production is limited, creating a deficiency of essential polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) for consumers. Previously, we demonstrated that allochthonous subsidy provides a significant flux of physiologically essential PUFAs into the shaded Krutaya Kacha River. Here, we aimed to reveal the specific terrestrial taxa driving this nutritional subsidy and compare them to aquatic taxa. Discriminant analysis separated aquatic from terrestrial taxa. Aquatic taxa, particularly Ephemeroptera, remained the primary source of physiologically valuable eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA; 20:5n‑3) for fish. Terrestrial phytophagous insects (Hemiptera, Homoptera, Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera, and Coleoptera) were rich in linoleic acid (LIN; 18:2n‑6) and/or alpha‑linolenic acid (ALA; 18:3n‑3) but contained very low levels of EPA and arachidonic acid (ARA; 20:4n‑6). By contrast, terrestrial predators and scavengers, especially Tetragnathidae (spiders) and Carabidae (carabid beetles), showed high EPA and ARA contents, comparable to those of aquatic insects. Spiders contained up to 10.6% EPA and 3.2% ARA, while carabid beetles contained up to 9.4% EPA and 4.0% ARA. Terrestrial invertebrates subsidized essential PUFAs via two discrete pathways: a direct pathway of LIN and/or ALA from terrestrial plants via phytophages and a “boomerang” pathway of ARA and EPA—from aquatic prey to terrestrial predators and scavengers and back into the river. These two pathways may be critical for essential lipid nutrition in shaded rivers occupying vast areas of boreal forests.
期刊介绍:
Aquatic Sciences – Research Across Boundaries publishes original research, overviews, and reviews dealing with aquatic systems (both freshwater and marine systems) and their boundaries, including the impact of human activities on these systems. The coverage ranges from molecular-level mechanistic studies to investigations at the whole ecosystem scale. Aquatic Sciences publishes articles presenting research across disciplinary and environmental boundaries, including studies examining interactions among geological, microbial, biological, chemical, physical, hydrological, and societal processes, as well as studies assessing land-water, air-water, benthic-pelagic, river-ocean, lentic-lotic, and groundwater-surface water interactions.