Jenny Palm, Anne Marthe Harstad, Ingvild Firman Fjellså, Poul Alberg Østergaard, Øystein Fjelldal, Brian Vad Mathiesen
{"title":"Flexibility capital and organisational demand-side flexibility: a conceptual framework illustrated by Norwegian organisations","authors":"Jenny Palm, Anne Marthe Harstad, Ingvild Firman Fjellså, Poul Alberg Østergaard, Øystein Fjelldal, Brian Vad Mathiesen","doi":"10.1007/s12053-026-10479-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In recent years, decarbonisation, electrification, and the increasing integration of variable renewable energy sources have intensified the need for demand-side flexibility in low-carbon electricity systems. While industry and commerce are widely recognised as holding substantial flexibility potential, their ability to mobilise this potential varies considerably across organisational and sectoral contexts. Existing research has primarily approached this flexibility as a techno-economic optimisation problem, while less attention has been devoted to the organisational and institutional conditions required to translate technical flexibility into active participation in flexibility markets. This article develops a conceptual framework for understanding organisational demand-side flexibility through the concept of flexibility capital. Building on socio-technical perspectives and demand response research, the article conceptualises flexibility as an organisational capability shaped by technical possibilities, organisational routines, financial resources, digital infrastructures, and institutional conditions. The framework is illustrated through interview and survey material from Norwegian organisations across commercial, industrial, agricultural, and public sectors. The findings show that technical flexibility potential does not automatically translate into actionable flexibility capability. Organisations frequently identify flexibility opportunities such as storage, buffering, and energy management systems, but their ability to mobilise these opportunities is constrained by operational continuity, investment costs, fragmented responsibilities, and limited organisational capacity. The article argues that flexibility is socially and institutionally organised rather than solely technically determined. By extending the concept of flexibility capital from households to organisational contexts, the framework contributes to research on demand-side flexibility, organisational capability, and flexibility justice in future low-carbon electricity systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":537,"journal":{"name":"Energy Efficiency","volume":"19 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12053-026-10479-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Efficiency","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12053-026-10479-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In recent years, decarbonisation, electrification, and the increasing integration of variable renewable energy sources have intensified the need for demand-side flexibility in low-carbon electricity systems. While industry and commerce are widely recognised as holding substantial flexibility potential, their ability to mobilise this potential varies considerably across organisational and sectoral contexts. Existing research has primarily approached this flexibility as a techno-economic optimisation problem, while less attention has been devoted to the organisational and institutional conditions required to translate technical flexibility into active participation in flexibility markets. This article develops a conceptual framework for understanding organisational demand-side flexibility through the concept of flexibility capital. Building on socio-technical perspectives and demand response research, the article conceptualises flexibility as an organisational capability shaped by technical possibilities, organisational routines, financial resources, digital infrastructures, and institutional conditions. The framework is illustrated through interview and survey material from Norwegian organisations across commercial, industrial, agricultural, and public sectors. The findings show that technical flexibility potential does not automatically translate into actionable flexibility capability. Organisations frequently identify flexibility opportunities such as storage, buffering, and energy management systems, but their ability to mobilise these opportunities is constrained by operational continuity, investment costs, fragmented responsibilities, and limited organisational capacity. The article argues that flexibility is socially and institutionally organised rather than solely technically determined. By extending the concept of flexibility capital from households to organisational contexts, the framework contributes to research on demand-side flexibility, organisational capability, and flexibility justice in future low-carbon electricity systems.
期刊介绍:
The journal Energy Efficiency covers wide-ranging aspects of energy efficiency in the residential, tertiary, industrial and transport sectors. Coverage includes a number of different topics and disciplines including energy efficiency policies at local, regional, national and international levels; long term impact of energy efficiency; technologies to improve energy efficiency; consumer behavior and the dynamics of consumption; socio-economic impacts of energy efficiency measures; energy efficiency as a virtual utility; transportation issues; building issues; energy management systems and energy services; energy planning and risk assessment; energy efficiency in developing countries and economies in transition; non-energy benefits of energy efficiency and opportunities for policy integration; energy education and training, and emerging technologies. See Aims and Scope for more details.