Flexibility capital and organisational demand-side flexibility: a conceptual framework illustrated by Norwegian organisations

IF 3.4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Jenny Palm, Anne Marthe Harstad, Ingvild Firman Fjellså, Poul Alberg Østergaard, Øystein Fjelldal, Brian Vad Mathiesen
{"title":"Flexibility capital and organisational demand-side flexibility: a conceptual framework illustrated by Norwegian organisations","authors":"Jenny Palm,&nbsp;Anne Marthe Harstad,&nbsp;Ingvild Firman Fjellså,&nbsp;Poul Alberg Østergaard,&nbsp;Øystein Fjelldal,&nbsp;Brian Vad Mathiesen","doi":"10.1007/s12053-026-10479-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In recent years, decarbonisation, electrification, and the increasing integration of variable renewable energy sources have intensified the need for demand-side flexibility in low-carbon electricity systems. While industry and commerce are widely recognised as holding substantial flexibility potential, their ability to mobilise this potential varies considerably across organisational and sectoral contexts. Existing research has primarily approached this flexibility as a techno-economic optimisation problem, while less attention has been devoted to the organisational and institutional conditions required to translate technical flexibility into active participation in flexibility markets. This article develops a conceptual framework for understanding organisational demand-side flexibility through the concept of flexibility capital. Building on socio-technical perspectives and demand response research, the article conceptualises flexibility as an organisational capability shaped by technical possibilities, organisational routines, financial resources, digital infrastructures, and institutional conditions. The framework is illustrated through interview and survey material from Norwegian organisations across commercial, industrial, agricultural, and public sectors. The findings show that technical flexibility potential does not automatically translate into actionable flexibility capability. Organisations frequently identify flexibility opportunities such as storage, buffering, and energy management systems, but their ability to mobilise these opportunities is constrained by operational continuity, investment costs, fragmented responsibilities, and limited organisational capacity. The article argues that flexibility is socially and institutionally organised rather than solely technically determined. By extending the concept of flexibility capital from households to organisational contexts, the framework contributes to research on demand-side flexibility, organisational capability, and flexibility justice in future low-carbon electricity systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":537,"journal":{"name":"Energy Efficiency","volume":"19 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12053-026-10479-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Efficiency","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12053-026-10479-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, decarbonisation, electrification, and the increasing integration of variable renewable energy sources have intensified the need for demand-side flexibility in low-carbon electricity systems. While industry and commerce are widely recognised as holding substantial flexibility potential, their ability to mobilise this potential varies considerably across organisational and sectoral contexts. Existing research has primarily approached this flexibility as a techno-economic optimisation problem, while less attention has been devoted to the organisational and institutional conditions required to translate technical flexibility into active participation in flexibility markets. This article develops a conceptual framework for understanding organisational demand-side flexibility through the concept of flexibility capital. Building on socio-technical perspectives and demand response research, the article conceptualises flexibility as an organisational capability shaped by technical possibilities, organisational routines, financial resources, digital infrastructures, and institutional conditions. The framework is illustrated through interview and survey material from Norwegian organisations across commercial, industrial, agricultural, and public sectors. The findings show that technical flexibility potential does not automatically translate into actionable flexibility capability. Organisations frequently identify flexibility opportunities such as storage, buffering, and energy management systems, but their ability to mobilise these opportunities is constrained by operational continuity, investment costs, fragmented responsibilities, and limited organisational capacity. The article argues that flexibility is socially and institutionally organised rather than solely technically determined. By extending the concept of flexibility capital from households to organisational contexts, the framework contributes to research on demand-side flexibility, organisational capability, and flexibility justice in future low-carbon electricity systems.

灵活性资本和组织需求侧灵活性:挪威组织说明的概念框架
近年来,脱碳、电气化和可变可再生能源的日益整合,加剧了对低碳电力系统需求侧灵活性的需求。虽然工业和商业被广泛认为具有巨大的灵活性潜力,但它们调动这种潜力的能力在不同的组织和部门背景下差异很大。现有的研究主要是将这种灵活性作为技术-经济优化问题来处理,而较少关注将技术灵活性转化为积极参与灵活性市场所需的组织和制度条件。本文通过柔性资本的概念,建立了一个理解组织需求侧灵活性的概念框架。基于社会技术视角和需求响应研究,本文将灵活性定义为一种由技术可能性、组织惯例、财务资源、数字基础设施和制度条件形成的组织能力。该框架通过来自挪威商业、工业、农业和公共部门组织的访谈和调查材料来说明。研究结果表明,技术灵活性潜力不会自动转化为可操作的灵活性能力。组织经常发现灵活性机会,如存储、缓冲和能源管理系统,但他们利用这些机会的能力受到运营连续性、投资成本、分散的责任和有限的组织能力的限制。文章认为,灵活性是由社会和制度组织起来的,而不仅仅是由技术决定的。通过将灵活性资本的概念从家庭扩展到组织背景,该框架有助于研究未来低碳电力系统中的需求侧灵活性、组织能力和灵活性正义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Efficiency
Energy Efficiency ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.50%
发文量
59
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Efficiency covers wide-ranging aspects of energy efficiency in the residential, tertiary, industrial and transport sectors. Coverage includes a number of different topics and disciplines including energy efficiency policies at local, regional, national and international levels; long term impact of energy efficiency; technologies to improve energy efficiency; consumer behavior and the dynamics of consumption; socio-economic impacts of energy efficiency measures; energy efficiency as a virtual utility; transportation issues; building issues; energy management systems and energy services; energy planning and risk assessment; energy efficiency in developing countries and economies in transition; non-energy benefits of energy efficiency and opportunities for policy integration; energy education and training, and emerging technologies. See Aims and Scope for more details.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书