Environmental Science at a Transformational Crossroads: Two Decades of the “National Conference on Environmental Chemistry” and the Future of New Pollutants Research
{"title":"Environmental Science at a Transformational Crossroads: Two Decades of the “National Conference on Environmental Chemistry” and the Future of New Pollutants Research","authors":"Lu Jiang, Qian Liu, Yawei Wang, Guibin Jiang","doi":"10.1021/envhealth.6c00429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental science is undergoing a critical transition\r\nfrom\r\npollutant-specific and end-of-pipe control to systemic sustainability\r\nscience. The development trajectory of the Chinese “National\r\nConference on Environmental Chemistry (NCEC)” provides an empirical\r\nlens through which to examine this broader disciplinary transformation.\r\nThis study analyzes how evolving governance demands, increasing environmental\r\ncomplexity, and advances in analytical and computational technologies\r\nhave collectively reshaped research priorities, disciplinary boundaries,\r\nand modes of scientific collaboration. The emergence of new pollutant\r\ngovernance as a central frontier reflects the limitations of conventional\r\nsingle-medium and single-pollutant regulatory frameworks. Persistent,\r\nlow-dose, and mixture-prone contaminants highlight the need for integrative\r\napproaches that link molecular mechanisms with cross-media processes\r\nand system-level outcomes. While it also accelerating methodological\r\nadvances in non-target screening, computational prediction, systems\r\ntoxicology, and cross-media risk assessment. The NCEC experience further\r\nillustrates how scientific platforms can connect frontier research,\r\ninterdisciplinary integration, resource mobilization, and science–policy\r\ndialogue. Drawing on the NCEC, we provide an empirically grounded\r\nperspective on how environmental science should move beyond reactive\r\nremediation toward anticipatory risk assessment, upstream prevention,\r\nsustainable chemical design, and system-level governance, offering\r\na broader framework for aligning research innovation with ecological\r\nresilience in global environmental governance.</p>","PeriodicalId":29795,"journal":{"name":"Environment & Health","volume":"4 10","pages":"2163–2171"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment & Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/envhealth.6c00429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Environmental science is undergoing a critical transition
from
pollutant-specific and end-of-pipe control to systemic sustainability
science. The development trajectory of the Chinese “National
Conference on Environmental Chemistry (NCEC)” provides an empirical
lens through which to examine this broader disciplinary transformation.
This study analyzes how evolving governance demands, increasing environmental
complexity, and advances in analytical and computational technologies
have collectively reshaped research priorities, disciplinary boundaries,
and modes of scientific collaboration. The emergence of new pollutant
governance as a central frontier reflects the limitations of conventional
single-medium and single-pollutant regulatory frameworks. Persistent,
low-dose, and mixture-prone contaminants highlight the need for integrative
approaches that link molecular mechanisms with cross-media processes
and system-level outcomes. While it also accelerating methodological
advances in non-target screening, computational prediction, systems
toxicology, and cross-media risk assessment. The NCEC experience further
illustrates how scientific platforms can connect frontier research,
interdisciplinary integration, resource mobilization, and science–policy
dialogue. Drawing on the NCEC, we provide an empirically grounded
perspective on how environmental science should move beyond reactive
remediation toward anticipatory risk assessment, upstream prevention,
sustainable chemical design, and system-level governance, offering
a broader framework for aligning research innovation with ecological
resilience in global environmental governance.
期刊介绍:
Environment & Health a peer-reviewed open access journal is committed to exploring the relationship between the environment and human health.As a premier journal for multidisciplinary research Environment & Health reports the health consequences for individuals and communities of changing and hazardous environmental factors. In supporting the UN Sustainable Development Goals the journal aims to help formulate policies to create a healthier world.Topics of interest include but are not limited to:Air water and soil pollutionExposomicsEnvironmental epidemiologyInnovative analytical methodology and instrumentation (multi-omics non-target analysis effect-directed analysis high-throughput screening etc.)Environmental toxicology (endocrine disrupting effect neurotoxicity alternative toxicology computational toxicology epigenetic toxicology etc.)Environmental microbiology pathogen and environmental transmission mechanisms of diseasesEnvironmental modeling bioinformatics and artificial intelligenceEmerging contaminants (including plastics engineered nanomaterials etc.)Climate change and related health effectHealth impacts of energy evolution and carbon neutralizationFood and drinking water safetyOccupational exposure and medicineInnovations in environmental technologies for better healthPolicies and international relations concerned with environmental health