Computational Study of the Gas-Phase Thermal Degradation and the Reaction Rate Coefficients of Chlorinated Perfluoro-Alkyl Carboxylic Acids

IF 3 2区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A Pub Date : 2026-10-15 Epub Date: 2026-08-30 DOI:10.1021/acs.jpca.6c02120
Claude-Bernard Paultre, Alexander M. Mebel, Kevin E. O’Shea
{"title":"Computational Study of the Gas-Phase Thermal Degradation and the Reaction Rate Coefficients of Chlorinated Perfluoro-Alkyl Carboxylic Acids","authors":"Claude-Bernard Paultre,&nbsp;Alexander M. Mebel,&nbsp;Kevin E. O’Shea","doi":"10.1021/acs.jpca.6c02120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Per-\r\nand polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a class of ubiquitous\r\npollutants that do not appreciatively biodegrade. A ban on the most\r\ncommonly used PFAS, perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids (PFCA) and perfluoroalkyl\r\nsulfonic acids, created a gap that was filled by several similarly\r\nheavily fluorinated compounds. While chemical and biological studies\r\non several subclasses of PFAS have progressed significantly, testing\r\non the chlorinated PFAS is still lagging. For most PFAS, the main\r\ntreatment consists of filtration followed by pyrolysis of the laden\r\nadsorbents. Herein, the pyrolytic degradation pathways of mono- and\r\npolychlorinated PFCA (ClxPFCA) are analyzed. This study showed that\r\nthe bond dissociation energies (BDEs) are slightly lower in the acid\r\nform compared to the carboxylate form. The C–Cl bonds are generally\r\nthe weakest (∼70 kcal/mol) while the strongest are the C–F\r\nbonds (105-110 kcal/mol). After studying their BDEs, the secondary\r\ndegradation pathways of the radicals formed by the first bond cleavage\r\nwere analyzed. Five reaction pathways were studied for the chlorinated\r\nradicals generated by the first bond cleavage. The activations energies\r\n(<em>E</em><sub>a</sub>) and the enthalpies (Δ<em>H</em>) in the cases of a barrierless reaction are similar among\r\nthe group of radicals. The lowest Ea are those of the Cl-shifts (∼10–25\r\nkcal/mol) while the most energetic pathways are the F-losses (50–65\r\nkcal/mol). Finally, a kinetic study was performed to evaluate the\r\nreaction rate coefficients of each pathway. It showed a preference\r\nfor the β-scission pathways at the highest temperatures analyzed\r\nand the F-shift followed by Cl-loss at the lowest temperatures. The\r\nlifetimes of the radicals are generally in the ms-min for the perfluorinated\r\nalkyl radicals and min-hr for the perfluorocarboxyalkyl radicals.</p>","PeriodicalId":59,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry A","volume":"130 41","pages":"8146–8159"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry A","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpca.6c02120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a class of ubiquitous pollutants that do not appreciatively biodegrade. A ban on the most commonly used PFAS, perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids (PFCA) and perfluoroalkyl sulfonic acids, created a gap that was filled by several similarly heavily fluorinated compounds. While chemical and biological studies on several subclasses of PFAS have progressed significantly, testing on the chlorinated PFAS is still lagging. For most PFAS, the main treatment consists of filtration followed by pyrolysis of the laden adsorbents. Herein, the pyrolytic degradation pathways of mono- and polychlorinated PFCA (ClxPFCA) are analyzed. This study showed that the bond dissociation energies (BDEs) are slightly lower in the acid form compared to the carboxylate form. The C–Cl bonds are generally the weakest (∼70 kcal/mol) while the strongest are the C–F bonds (105-110 kcal/mol). After studying their BDEs, the secondary degradation pathways of the radicals formed by the first bond cleavage were analyzed. Five reaction pathways were studied for the chlorinated radicals generated by the first bond cleavage. The activations energies (Ea) and the enthalpies (ΔH) in the cases of a barrierless reaction are similar among the group of radicals. The lowest Ea are those of the Cl-shifts (∼10–25 kcal/mol) while the most energetic pathways are the F-losses (50–65 kcal/mol). Finally, a kinetic study was performed to evaluate the reaction rate coefficients of each pathway. It showed a preference for the β-scission pathways at the highest temperatures analyzed and the F-shift followed by Cl-loss at the lowest temperatures. The lifetimes of the radicals are generally in the ms-min for the perfluorinated alkyl radicals and min-hr for the perfluorocarboxyalkyl radicals.

氯化全氟烷基羧酸气相热降解及反应速率系数的计算研究
全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)是一类普遍存在的污染物,不能有效生物降解。禁止使用最常用的全氟磺酸、全氟烷基羧酸(PFCA)和全氟烷基磺酸造成了一个空白,由几种类似的高氟化合物填补。虽然对几种PFAS亚类的化学和生物学研究取得了重大进展,但对氯化PFAS的测试仍然滞后。对于大多数PFAS,主要处理包括过滤,然后是负载吸附剂的热解。本文分析了单氯和多氯PFCA (ClxPFCA)的热解降解途径。该研究表明,与羧酸盐形式相比,酸形式的键离解能(BDEs)略低。C-Cl键通常是最弱的(~ 70 kcal/mol),而最强的是c - f键(105-110 kcal/mol)。在研究了它们的bde后,分析了第一次键断裂形成的自由基的二次降解途径。研究了由第一次键裂解产生的氯离子自由基的5种反应途径。在无势垒反应中,基团之间的活化能(Ea)和焓(ΔH)是相似的。最低的Ea是cl位移(~ 10-25kcal /mol),而能量最高的途径是f损失(50-65kcal /mol)。最后,通过动力学研究对各途径的反应速率系数进行了评价。结果表明,在分析的最高温度下,β-断裂途径优先;在分析的最低温度下,f -移位后是cl -损失。全氟化烷基自由基的寿命一般在ms-min,全氟化羧烷基自由基的寿命一般在min-hr。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 化学-物理:原子、分子和化学物理
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
922
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physical Chemistry A is devoted to reporting new and original experimental and theoretical basic research of interest to physical chemists, biophysical chemists, and chemical physicists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书