Efrat Bucris, Tal Levin, Roberto Azar, Batya Mannasse, Hadar Assraf, Vardit Moshayoff, Roaa Shatrubi, Yara Kanaaneh, Victoria Indenbaum, Neta S Zuckerman, Yaniv Lustig, Oran Erster
{"title":"Rapid Differentiation of Vaccine and Wild-Type Measles Virus During an Ongoing Outbreak using a new molecular assay","authors":"Efrat Bucris, Tal Levin, Roberto Azar, Batya Mannasse, Hadar Assraf, Vardit Moshayoff, Roaa Shatrubi, Yara Kanaaneh, Victoria Indenbaum, Neta S Zuckerman, Yaniv Lustig, Oran Erster","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiag518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Differentiating wild and vaccine measles virus (MeV) strains is critical for appropriate healthcare response during outbreak vaccination campaigns. Sequencing, the current standard, is expensive, time-consuming, and limited to specialized laboratories. We developed and implemented a novel differential MeV RT-qPCR assay to address these challenges, which we describe herein. Methods We designed a differential two-step assay; the first step, termed MRRV, distinguishes between rubella, wild MeV, and vaccine MeV. The second, termed “MeV differential”, differentiates between genotypes A (vaccine), B and D. Results The assay detects 10-50 copies per reaction and accurately classifies weak clinical samples (Cq > 32), with 100% accuracy, compared with the N gene sequencing gold standard. Evaluated on over 4,000 clinical samples retrospectively and during the 2025-2026MeV outbreak in Israel, the assay revealed that ∼9% of tested originated from vaccine strain. Among tested municipalities, those running active vaccination campaigns had significantly higher vaccine strain detections (>10 cases each) than those with routine vaccination (1-2 cases). Retrospective analysis of samples from 2018-2024 identified a mix of B and D strains. The novel assay successfully identified double infection cases (exposure to a wild strain shortly before or after vaccination). Conclusion The novel assay proved useful both as a diagnostic tool that enables focused, efficient healthcare response, and as an epidemiological tool that provides valuable information in real-time. This assay is faster, cheaper and more amendable for high throughput testing, compared with the gold-standard sequencing classification.","PeriodicalId":501010,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiag518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background Differentiating wild and vaccine measles virus (MeV) strains is critical for appropriate healthcare response during outbreak vaccination campaigns. Sequencing, the current standard, is expensive, time-consuming, and limited to specialized laboratories. We developed and implemented a novel differential MeV RT-qPCR assay to address these challenges, which we describe herein. Methods We designed a differential two-step assay; the first step, termed MRRV, distinguishes between rubella, wild MeV, and vaccine MeV. The second, termed “MeV differential”, differentiates between genotypes A (vaccine), B and D. Results The assay detects 10-50 copies per reaction and accurately classifies weak clinical samples (Cq > 32), with 100% accuracy, compared with the N gene sequencing gold standard. Evaluated on over 4,000 clinical samples retrospectively and during the 2025-2026MeV outbreak in Israel, the assay revealed that ∼9% of tested originated from vaccine strain. Among tested municipalities, those running active vaccination campaigns had significantly higher vaccine strain detections (>10 cases each) than those with routine vaccination (1-2 cases). Retrospective analysis of samples from 2018-2024 identified a mix of B and D strains. The novel assay successfully identified double infection cases (exposure to a wild strain shortly before or after vaccination). Conclusion The novel assay proved useful both as a diagnostic tool that enables focused, efficient healthcare response, and as an epidemiological tool that provides valuable information in real-time. This assay is faster, cheaper and more amendable for high throughput testing, compared with the gold-standard sequencing classification.