Rapid Differentiation of Vaccine and Wild-Type Measles Virus During an Ongoing Outbreak using a new molecular assay

Efrat Bucris, Tal Levin, Roberto Azar, Batya Mannasse, Hadar Assraf, Vardit Moshayoff, Roaa Shatrubi, Yara Kanaaneh, Victoria Indenbaum, Neta S Zuckerman, Yaniv Lustig, Oran Erster
{"title":"Rapid Differentiation of Vaccine and Wild-Type Measles Virus During an Ongoing Outbreak using a new molecular assay","authors":"Efrat Bucris, Tal Levin, Roberto Azar, Batya Mannasse, Hadar Assraf, Vardit Moshayoff, Roaa Shatrubi, Yara Kanaaneh, Victoria Indenbaum, Neta S Zuckerman, Yaniv Lustig, Oran Erster","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiag518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Differentiating wild and vaccine measles virus (MeV) strains is critical for appropriate healthcare response during outbreak vaccination campaigns. Sequencing, the current standard, is expensive, time-consuming, and limited to specialized laboratories. We developed and implemented a novel differential MeV RT-qPCR assay to address these challenges, which we describe herein. Methods We designed a differential two-step assay; the first step, termed MRRV, distinguishes between rubella, wild MeV, and vaccine MeV. The second, termed “MeV differential”, differentiates between genotypes A (vaccine), B and D. Results The assay detects 10-50 copies per reaction and accurately classifies weak clinical samples (Cq > 32), with 100% accuracy, compared with the N gene sequencing gold standard. Evaluated on over 4,000 clinical samples retrospectively and during the 2025-2026MeV outbreak in Israel, the assay revealed that ∼9% of tested originated from vaccine strain. Among tested municipalities, those running active vaccination campaigns had significantly higher vaccine strain detections (>10 cases each) than those with routine vaccination (1-2 cases). Retrospective analysis of samples from 2018-2024 identified a mix of B and D strains. The novel assay successfully identified double infection cases (exposure to a wild strain shortly before or after vaccination). Conclusion The novel assay proved useful both as a diagnostic tool that enables focused, efficient healthcare response, and as an epidemiological tool that provides valuable information in real-time. This assay is faster, cheaper and more amendable for high throughput testing, compared with the gold-standard sequencing classification.","PeriodicalId":501010,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiag518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Differentiating wild and vaccine measles virus (MeV) strains is critical for appropriate healthcare response during outbreak vaccination campaigns. Sequencing, the current standard, is expensive, time-consuming, and limited to specialized laboratories. We developed and implemented a novel differential MeV RT-qPCR assay to address these challenges, which we describe herein. Methods We designed a differential two-step assay; the first step, termed MRRV, distinguishes between rubella, wild MeV, and vaccine MeV. The second, termed “MeV differential”, differentiates between genotypes A (vaccine), B and D. Results The assay detects 10-50 copies per reaction and accurately classifies weak clinical samples (Cq > 32), with 100% accuracy, compared with the N gene sequencing gold standard. Evaluated on over 4,000 clinical samples retrospectively and during the 2025-2026MeV outbreak in Israel, the assay revealed that ∼9% of tested originated from vaccine strain. Among tested municipalities, those running active vaccination campaigns had significantly higher vaccine strain detections (>10 cases each) than those with routine vaccination (1-2 cases). Retrospective analysis of samples from 2018-2024 identified a mix of B and D strains. The novel assay successfully identified double infection cases (exposure to a wild strain shortly before or after vaccination). Conclusion The novel assay proved useful both as a diagnostic tool that enables focused, efficient healthcare response, and as an epidemiological tool that provides valuable information in real-time. This assay is faster, cheaper and more amendable for high throughput testing, compared with the gold-standard sequencing classification.
在持续爆发期间使用新的分子测定快速区分疫苗和野生型麻疹病毒
背景在疫情疫苗接种运动期间,区分麻疹病毒毒株和麻疹疫苗毒株对于适当的卫生保健反应至关重要。测序,目前的标准,是昂贵的,耗时的,并且仅限于专门的实验室。我们开发并实施了一种新的差分MeV RT-qPCR检测来解决这些挑战,我们在此描述。方法设计两步鉴别法;第一步,称为MRRV,区分风疹、野生MeV和疫苗MeV。第二种方法被称为“MeV差异”,可区分A(疫苗)、B和d基因型。结果与N基因测序金标准相比,该方法每次反应可检测10-50个拷贝,并能准确分类弱临床样本(Cq > 32),准确率为100%。在以色列2025-2026年mev暴发期间对4000多份临床样本进行回顾性评估,该分析显示,约9%的受测病毒来自疫苗株。在接受测试的城市中,开展积极疫苗接种运动的城市的疫苗株检出率(各10例)明显高于常规疫苗接种的城市(1-2例)。回顾性分析2018-2024年的样本发现了B型和D型菌株的混合。这种新方法成功地鉴定了双重感染病例(在接种疫苗之前或之后不久暴露于野生毒株)。结论:这种新型检测方法既可作为一种诊断工具,实现集中、高效的医疗响应,又可作为一种流行病学工具,实时提供有价值的信息。与金标准测序分类相比,该分析更快,更便宜,更适合高通量测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书