Association Between Binocular Vision Disorders and Contact Lens Discomfort During Soft Contact Lens Wear: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.4
Prithwis Manna, Ankit Raj, Ankita Kumari, Mark Willcox, Fiona Stapleton, James S Wolffsohn, Mukesh Kumar
{"title":"Association Between Binocular Vision Disorders and Contact Lens Discomfort During Soft Contact Lens Wear: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Prithwis Manna, Ankit Raj, Ankita Kumari, Mark Willcox, Fiona Stapleton, James S Wolffsohn, Mukesh Kumar","doi":"10.1007/s44402-026-00203-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To synthesise and critically evaluate the evidence regarding accommodative and binocular vision dysfunction systematically in relation to visual discomfort during soft contact lens wear in non-presbyopic individuals, and to examine the association between soft contact lens optical designs and objective measures of accommodation and vergence.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar (inception to 13 May 2026) identified 403 records, of which 23 studies met the inclusion criteria, including 16 randomised trials, five non-randomised studies and two cross-sectional studies. Evidence demonstrated consistently that centre-distance multifocal, dual-focus and extended-depth-of-focus (EDOF) soft contact lenses increased accommodative lag (1.0-1.7 D), accommodative variability (0.36-0.86 D) and near exophoria (1.8-2.4Δ), while reducing accommodative facility (4.5-9 cpm) compared with single-vision designs. Similar effects were observed across a broad range of myopic refractive errors (-1.00 to -9.25 D). In contrast, centre-near multifocal lenses were associated with lower accommodative lag and reduced near exophoria relative to single-vision and centre-distance multifocal designs. Toric soft contact lenses demonstrated improvements in near point of convergence (NPC) and subjective visual performance. Across studies evaluating symptomatic wearers, binocular vision dysfunction was reported in 23%-48% of participants and was associated with significantly greater symptom severity, as reflected by higher Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS) scores (p < 0.001). Collectively, these findings indicate that alterations in accommodative and vergence function associated with specific soft contact lens optical designs may be associated with visual discomfort during lens wear. Given the high prevalence of binocular vision dysfunction among symptomatic contact lens wearers, a brief binocular vision screening, including accommodative facility, near heterophoria, NPC and fusional vergence testing may assist clinicians in identifying underlying causes of visual discomfort and guiding targeted management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":520731,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44402-026-00203-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To synthesise and critically evaluate the evidence regarding accommodative and binocular vision dysfunction systematically in relation to visual discomfort during soft contact lens wear in non-presbyopic individuals, and to examine the association between soft contact lens optical designs and objective measures of accommodation and vergence.

Recent findings: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar (inception to 13 May 2026) identified 403 records, of which 23 studies met the inclusion criteria, including 16 randomised trials, five non-randomised studies and two cross-sectional studies. Evidence demonstrated consistently that centre-distance multifocal, dual-focus and extended-depth-of-focus (EDOF) soft contact lenses increased accommodative lag (1.0-1.7 D), accommodative variability (0.36-0.86 D) and near exophoria (1.8-2.4Δ), while reducing accommodative facility (4.5-9 cpm) compared with single-vision designs. Similar effects were observed across a broad range of myopic refractive errors (-1.00 to -9.25 D). In contrast, centre-near multifocal lenses were associated with lower accommodative lag and reduced near exophoria relative to single-vision and centre-distance multifocal designs. Toric soft contact lenses demonstrated improvements in near point of convergence (NPC) and subjective visual performance. Across studies evaluating symptomatic wearers, binocular vision dysfunction was reported in 23%-48% of participants and was associated with significantly greater symptom severity, as reflected by higher Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS) scores (p < 0.001). Collectively, these findings indicate that alterations in accommodative and vergence function associated with specific soft contact lens optical designs may be associated with visual discomfort during lens wear. Given the high prevalence of binocular vision dysfunction among symptomatic contact lens wearers, a brief binocular vision screening, including accommodative facility, near heterophoria, NPC and fusional vergence testing may assist clinicians in identifying underlying causes of visual discomfort and guiding targeted management strategies.

软性隐形眼镜佩戴期间双眼视力障碍与隐形眼镜不适之间的关系:一项系统综述。
目的:综合并批判性地评价非老花眼患者配戴软性隐形眼镜时与视觉不适相关的适应性和双眼视觉功能障碍的证据,并研究软性隐形眼镜光学设计与适应性和会聚的客观测量之间的关系。最近发现:对PubMed、Scopus和b谷歌Scholar(成立至2026年5月13日)进行系统检索,确定了403项记录,其中23项研究符合纳入标准,包括16项随机试验、5项非随机试验和2项横断面研究。证据一致表明,中距多焦、双焦和扩展焦深(EDOF)软性隐形眼镜增加了调节滞后(1.0-1.7 D)、调节变异性(0.36-0.86 D)和近外焦(1.8-2.4Δ),同时减少了调节设施(4.5-9 cpm)。在近视屈光不正(-1.00至-9.25 D)的大范围内观察到类似的效果。相比之下,与单眼和中距多焦设计相比,中距多焦透镜具有较低的调节滞后和较低的近外斜视。环力软性隐形眼镜在近会聚点(NPC)和主观视觉表现方面均有改善。在评估有症状佩戴者的研究中,23%-48%的参与者报告了双眼视力障碍,并与更严重的症状相关,这反映在更高的眼表疾病指数(OSDI)和会聚功能不全症状调查(CISS)得分上
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书