Effect of Lens Shape and Thickness on the Accommodative Range in Adults Aged 40-50 Years.

IF 2.4
Evelien Janssen, Sarah Hershko, Barbara K Pierscionek, Carina Koppen, Jos J Rozema
{"title":"Effect of Lens Shape and Thickness on the Accommodative Range in Adults Aged 40-50 Years.","authors":"Evelien Janssen, Sarah Hershko, Barbara K Pierscionek, Carina Koppen, Jos J Rozema","doi":"10.1007/s44402-026-00206-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the influence of lens shape on accommodative range in individuals aged 40-50 years, a period during which accommodative loss becomes clinically relevant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Accommodation was measured in 40 participants aged 40-50 years using the RAF Convergence Rule and the Negative Lens Test. Crystalline lens geometry and power, as well as corneal power, axial length and anterior chamber depth, were assessed under cycloplegia using an autorefractor, Pentacam, Lenstar and Casia II OCT. Associations between accommodative range and lenticular parameters were analysed through correlation analysis, with and without corrections for age, sex and refractive error.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant correlation was observed between the lenticular dimensions and the accommodative range. The change in accommodative amplitude with age was correlated with corneal power and axial length. After correcting for sex and age, these latter two correlations were no longer significant. An additional correction for the spherical equivalent refractive error did not change this result.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The geometry of the crystalline lens does not affect the accommodative range in early presbyopic eyes, suggesting that changes in baseline lens shape are not the primary contributor to presbyopia. In contrast to expectations based on geometrical considerations, thicker or more curved lenses did not exhibit reduced accommodation.</p>","PeriodicalId":520731,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44402-026-00206-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the influence of lens shape on accommodative range in individuals aged 40-50 years, a period during which accommodative loss becomes clinically relevant.

Methods: Accommodation was measured in 40 participants aged 40-50 years using the RAF Convergence Rule and the Negative Lens Test. Crystalline lens geometry and power, as well as corneal power, axial length and anterior chamber depth, were assessed under cycloplegia using an autorefractor, Pentacam, Lenstar and Casia II OCT. Associations between accommodative range and lenticular parameters were analysed through correlation analysis, with and without corrections for age, sex and refractive error.

Results: No significant correlation was observed between the lenticular dimensions and the accommodative range. The change in accommodative amplitude with age was correlated with corneal power and axial length. After correcting for sex and age, these latter two correlations were no longer significant. An additional correction for the spherical equivalent refractive error did not change this result.

Conclusions: The geometry of the crystalline lens does not affect the accommodative range in early presbyopic eyes, suggesting that changes in baseline lens shape are not the primary contributor to presbyopia. In contrast to expectations based on geometrical considerations, thicker or more curved lenses did not exhibit reduced accommodation.

40-50岁成人晶状体形状和厚度对调节范围的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书