Functional Connectivity Among Prefrontal, Hippocampal, and Temporal Systems Supporting Conceptual Change in Science Learning.

IF 6.4
International journal of neural systems Pub Date : 2027-02-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-02 DOI:10.1142/S0129065727500134
Hsiao-Ching She, Meng-Jun Chen, Hsin-Ju Tsai, Jeng-Ren Duann, Li-Yu Huang, Wen-Chi Chou, Ching-Ying Hsueh
{"title":"Functional Connectivity Among Prefrontal, Hippocampal, and Temporal Systems Supporting Conceptual Change in Science Learning.","authors":"Hsiao-Ching She, Meng-Jun Chen, Hsin-Ju Tsai, Jeng-Ren Duann, Li-Yu Huang, Wen-Chi Chou, Ching-Ying Hsueh","doi":"10.1142/S0129065727500134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scientific conceptual change poses a cognitive challenge in science learning, requiring cognitive conflict resolution and restructuring of entrenched semantic knowledge. Although neuroscience implicates coordinated prefrontal cognitive control and hippocampal-temporal systems in conflict resolution and semantic memory updating, direct neural evidence of their interaction during conceptual change remains limited. Using functional MRI and Granger Causality (GC) analyses, we examined neural mechanisms distinguishing successful from unsuccessful conceptual change across task complexities in 48 undergraduate and graduate STEM majors who completed 39 conceptual change tasks (19 weak restructuring task, 20 radical restructuring task). Learners exhibited greater conceptual change success during weak than radical restructuring, with enhanced BOLD activation in the superior, middle, and inferior frontal gyri (SFG, MFG, IFG), Hippocampus (HIP), and Superior Temporal Gyrus (STG) during successful versus unsuccessful conceptual change. GC analysis identified a minimal network (SFG, MFG→HIP, STG→MTG, MTG→HIP) common to both conditions, whereas successful conceptual change engaged a denser prefrontal-hippocampal-temporal network, marked by additional unidirectional (MFG→SFG, MFG→IFG, IFG→HIP) and bidirectional (MFG↔STG, STG↔HIP, MTG↔HIP) connectivity. Unsuccessful conceptual change was characterized by shallow, fragmented connectivity and limited cross-regional integration. Collectively, these findings suggest that effective conceptual change arises from coordinated neural networks integrating executive control, semantic processing, and memory updating.</p>","PeriodicalId":94052,"journal":{"name":"International journal of neural systems","volume":"37 2","pages":"2750013"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2027-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of neural systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129065727500134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scientific conceptual change poses a cognitive challenge in science learning, requiring cognitive conflict resolution and restructuring of entrenched semantic knowledge. Although neuroscience implicates coordinated prefrontal cognitive control and hippocampal-temporal systems in conflict resolution and semantic memory updating, direct neural evidence of their interaction during conceptual change remains limited. Using functional MRI and Granger Causality (GC) analyses, we examined neural mechanisms distinguishing successful from unsuccessful conceptual change across task complexities in 48 undergraduate and graduate STEM majors who completed 39 conceptual change tasks (19 weak restructuring task, 20 radical restructuring task). Learners exhibited greater conceptual change success during weak than radical restructuring, with enhanced BOLD activation in the superior, middle, and inferior frontal gyri (SFG, MFG, IFG), Hippocampus (HIP), and Superior Temporal Gyrus (STG) during successful versus unsuccessful conceptual change. GC analysis identified a minimal network (SFG, MFG→HIP, STG→MTG, MTG→HIP) common to both conditions, whereas successful conceptual change engaged a denser prefrontal-hippocampal-temporal network, marked by additional unidirectional (MFG→SFG, MFG→IFG, IFG→HIP) and bidirectional (MFG↔STG, STG↔HIP, MTG↔HIP) connectivity. Unsuccessful conceptual change was characterized by shallow, fragmented connectivity and limited cross-regional integration. Collectively, these findings suggest that effective conceptual change arises from coordinated neural networks integrating executive control, semantic processing, and memory updating.

支持科学学习概念变化的前额叶、海马体和颞叶系统的功能连通性。
科学概念的变化对科学学习提出了认知挑战,需要认知冲突的解决和根深蒂固的语义知识的重组。虽然神经科学暗示协调前额叶认知控制和海马体-颞叶系统在冲突解决和语义记忆更新中,但在概念变化过程中它们相互作用的直接神经证据仍然有限。利用功能磁共振成像和格兰杰因果关系(GC)分析,研究了48名STEM专业本科生和研究生完成39项概念变化任务(19项弱重构任务,20项激进重构任务)后,在不同任务复杂性下区分概念变化成功与不成功的神经机制。学习者在弱重组过程中比激进重组过程中表现出更大的概念变化成功,在成功和不成功的概念变化过程中,上、中、下额回(SFG, MFG, IFG)、海马体(HIP)和颞上回(STG)的BOLD激活增强。GC分析确定了一个最小网络(SFG, MFG→HIP, STG→MTG, MTG→HIP)对这两种情况都是共同的,而成功的概念变化涉及一个更密集的前额叶-海马-颞叶网络,其特征是额外的单向(MFG→SFG, MFG→IFG, IFG→HIP)和双向(MFG↔STG, STG↔HIP, MTG↔HIP)连接。不成功的概念转变的特征是浅的、碎片化的连通性和有限的跨区域一体化。总的来说,这些发现表明,有效的概念变化来自于整合执行控制、语义处理和记忆更新的协调神经网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书