A pharmacokinetic study comparing a low-dose estrogen contraceptive transdermal system with an oral contraceptive tablet in healthy adult females.

IF 5.4
Matthew Hummel, Mark Liu, Sandeep Jagtap, Debdipta Bose, Andrew Shaw, Tieliang Yan, Janet K Gersten
{"title":"A pharmacokinetic study comparing a low-dose estrogen contraceptive transdermal system with an oral contraceptive tablet in healthy adult females.","authors":"Matthew Hummel, Mark Liu, Sandeep Jagtap, Debdipta Bose, Andrew Shaw, Tieliang Yan, Janet K Gersten","doi":"10.1080/17425247.2026.2748749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a once-weekly low-dose estrogen contraceptive transdermal system (TDS) and a once-daily combined oral contraceptive (COC) in healthy women.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>In this Phase 1 study, 24 healthy women aged 18-35 years were randomized to a crossover sequence of three consecutive 168-h applications of the norelgestromin (NGMN; drug load, 4.86 mg)/ethinyl estradiol (EE; drug load, 0.264 mg) TDS to the abdomen (Treatment A) or buttock (Treatment B), followed by once-daily COC (drug load 0.18 mg norgestimate/0.025 mg EE) for 7 days (Treatment C). Plasma NGMN and EE concentrations were assessed using PK parameters. Application-site irritation, residual patch analysis, and safety were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Variability in NGMN and EE exposure was lower for Treatments A and B versus Treatment C (AUC<sub>τ,ss</sub>: NGMN, 38.4% and 31.7% versus 47.0%; EE, 49.3% and 35.4% versus 51.2%) with comparable/lower C<sub>p, ss(max)</sub> variability. EE C<sub>p, ss(max).</sub> Normalized exposure were lower with the NGMN/EE TDS. No serious adverse events occurred. Residual patch analysis indicated delivery of ~200 µg/day NGMN and 19 µg/day EE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The NGMN/EE TDS demonstrated lower PK variability, EE peak concentrations and normalized EE exposure than the COC. No new safety signals were reported.</p>","PeriodicalId":94004,"journal":{"name":"Expert opinion on drug delivery","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert opinion on drug delivery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2026.2748749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a once-weekly low-dose estrogen contraceptive transdermal system (TDS) and a once-daily combined oral contraceptive (COC) in healthy women.

Research design and methods: In this Phase 1 study, 24 healthy women aged 18-35 years were randomized to a crossover sequence of three consecutive 168-h applications of the norelgestromin (NGMN; drug load, 4.86 mg)/ethinyl estradiol (EE; drug load, 0.264 mg) TDS to the abdomen (Treatment A) or buttock (Treatment B), followed by once-daily COC (drug load 0.18 mg norgestimate/0.025 mg EE) for 7 days (Treatment C). Plasma NGMN and EE concentrations were assessed using PK parameters. Application-site irritation, residual patch analysis, and safety were also evaluated.

Results: Variability in NGMN and EE exposure was lower for Treatments A and B versus Treatment C (AUCτ,ss: NGMN, 38.4% and 31.7% versus 47.0%; EE, 49.3% and 35.4% versus 51.2%) with comparable/lower Cp, ss(max) variability. EE Cp, ss(max). Normalized exposure were lower with the NGMN/EE TDS. No serious adverse events occurred. Residual patch analysis indicated delivery of ~200 µg/day NGMN and 19 µg/day EE.

Conclusions: The NGMN/EE TDS demonstrated lower PK variability, EE peak concentrations and normalized EE exposure than the COC. No new safety signals were reported.

在健康成年女性中比较低剂量雌激素透皮避孕系统和口服避孕药的药代动力学研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书