Matthew Hummel, Mark Liu, Sandeep Jagtap, Debdipta Bose, Andrew Shaw, Tieliang Yan, Janet K Gersten
{"title":"A pharmacokinetic study comparing a low-dose estrogen contraceptive transdermal system with an oral contraceptive tablet in healthy adult females.","authors":"Matthew Hummel, Mark Liu, Sandeep Jagtap, Debdipta Bose, Andrew Shaw, Tieliang Yan, Janet K Gersten","doi":"10.1080/17425247.2026.2748749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a once-weekly low-dose estrogen contraceptive transdermal system (TDS) and a once-daily combined oral contraceptive (COC) in healthy women.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>In this Phase 1 study, 24 healthy women aged 18-35 years were randomized to a crossover sequence of three consecutive 168-h applications of the norelgestromin (NGMN; drug load, 4.86 mg)/ethinyl estradiol (EE; drug load, 0.264 mg) TDS to the abdomen (Treatment A) or buttock (Treatment B), followed by once-daily COC (drug load 0.18 mg norgestimate/0.025 mg EE) for 7 days (Treatment C). Plasma NGMN and EE concentrations were assessed using PK parameters. Application-site irritation, residual patch analysis, and safety were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Variability in NGMN and EE exposure was lower for Treatments A and B versus Treatment C (AUC<sub>τ,ss</sub>: NGMN, 38.4% and 31.7% versus 47.0%; EE, 49.3% and 35.4% versus 51.2%) with comparable/lower C<sub>p, ss(max)</sub> variability. EE C<sub>p, ss(max).</sub> Normalized exposure were lower with the NGMN/EE TDS. No serious adverse events occurred. Residual patch analysis indicated delivery of ~200 µg/day NGMN and 19 µg/day EE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The NGMN/EE TDS demonstrated lower PK variability, EE peak concentrations and normalized EE exposure than the COC. No new safety signals were reported.</p>","PeriodicalId":94004,"journal":{"name":"Expert opinion on drug delivery","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert opinion on drug delivery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2026.2748749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a once-weekly low-dose estrogen contraceptive transdermal system (TDS) and a once-daily combined oral contraceptive (COC) in healthy women.
Research design and methods: In this Phase 1 study, 24 healthy women aged 18-35 years were randomized to a crossover sequence of three consecutive 168-h applications of the norelgestromin (NGMN; drug load, 4.86 mg)/ethinyl estradiol (EE; drug load, 0.264 mg) TDS to the abdomen (Treatment A) or buttock (Treatment B), followed by once-daily COC (drug load 0.18 mg norgestimate/0.025 mg EE) for 7 days (Treatment C). Plasma NGMN and EE concentrations were assessed using PK parameters. Application-site irritation, residual patch analysis, and safety were also evaluated.
Results: Variability in NGMN and EE exposure was lower for Treatments A and B versus Treatment C (AUCτ,ss: NGMN, 38.4% and 31.7% versus 47.0%; EE, 49.3% and 35.4% versus 51.2%) with comparable/lower Cp, ss(max) variability. EE Cp, ss(max). Normalized exposure were lower with the NGMN/EE TDS. No serious adverse events occurred. Residual patch analysis indicated delivery of ~200 µg/day NGMN and 19 µg/day EE.
Conclusions: The NGMN/EE TDS demonstrated lower PK variability, EE peak concentrations and normalized EE exposure than the COC. No new safety signals were reported.