Converting short cognitive screen scores: Comparing the Quick mild cognitive impairment screen, Montreal cognitive assessment, and Mini-mental state examination.

IF 2.8 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports Pub Date : 2026-04-22 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/25424823261441514
Rónán O'Caoimh, Eleanor Marks, Mark R O'Donovan
{"title":"Converting short cognitive screen scores: Comparing the Quick mild cognitive impairment screen, Montreal cognitive assessment, and Mini-mental state examination.","authors":"Rónán O'Caoimh, Eleanor Marks, Mark R O'Donovan","doi":"10.1177/25424823261441514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment (Q<i>mci</i>) screen is a short cognitive screening instrument developed to detect mild cognitive impairment (MCI). No conversion tables exist between the Q<i>mci</i> screen and commonly-used instruments such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) or Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), limiting comparability across settings and studies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To create bidirectional conversion tables between the Q<i>mci</i> screen, MMSE, and MoCA in a memory clinic cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A secondary analysis of data from 551 older adults attending a single-center Irish university-hospital memory clinic (2012-2014) was performed. Participants were classified as normal (n = 101), subjective cognitive disorder (n = 73), MCI (n = 103), and dementia (n = 274). Q<i>mci</i> screen, MMSE, and MoCA scores were available for all participants. Equipercentile equating with log-linear smoothing generated score equivalencies and 95% confidence intervals (CI) between instruments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Q<i>mci</i> screen demonstrated a broader scoring range and greater sensitivity in the mid-range of cognitive performance than either the MMSE or MoCA. Conversion tables revealed a non-linear relationship between instruments, with ceiling effects observed for the MMSE and MoCA. At established cut-offs, an MMSE score of 24/30 equated to a Q<i>mci</i> screen score of 42/100, while a MoCA score of 26/30 corresponded to a Q<i>mci</i> screen score of 71/100 (95% CI: 68-74). Bidirectional tables allow translation of scores across tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides validated conversion tables between the Q<i>mci</i> screen and two widely-used cognitive instruments, to support the use of the Q<i>mci</i> screen in research (facilitating cross-instrument comparability and harmonization across studies), and clinical settings (determining eligibility for disease-modifying therapies).</p>","PeriodicalId":73594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports","volume":"10 ","pages":"25424823261441514"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13662326/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25424823261441514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment (Qmci) screen is a short cognitive screening instrument developed to detect mild cognitive impairment (MCI). No conversion tables exist between the Qmci screen and commonly-used instruments such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) or Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), limiting comparability across settings and studies.

Objective: To create bidirectional conversion tables between the Qmci screen, MMSE, and MoCA in a memory clinic cohort.

Methods: A secondary analysis of data from 551 older adults attending a single-center Irish university-hospital memory clinic (2012-2014) was performed. Participants were classified as normal (n = 101), subjective cognitive disorder (n = 73), MCI (n = 103), and dementia (n = 274). Qmci screen, MMSE, and MoCA scores were available for all participants. Equipercentile equating with log-linear smoothing generated score equivalencies and 95% confidence intervals (CI) between instruments.

Results: The Qmci screen demonstrated a broader scoring range and greater sensitivity in the mid-range of cognitive performance than either the MMSE or MoCA. Conversion tables revealed a non-linear relationship between instruments, with ceiling effects observed for the MMSE and MoCA. At established cut-offs, an MMSE score of 24/30 equated to a Qmci screen score of 42/100, while a MoCA score of 26/30 corresponded to a Qmci screen score of 71/100 (95% CI: 68-74). Bidirectional tables allow translation of scores across tools.

Conclusions: This study provides validated conversion tables between the Qmci screen and two widely-used cognitive instruments, to support the use of the Qmci screen in research (facilitating cross-instrument comparability and harmonization across studies), and clinical settings (determining eligibility for disease-modifying therapies).

转换短认知屏幕得分:比较快速轻度认知障碍屏幕,蒙特利尔认知评估,和迷你精神状态检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书