Status of Medical Aesthetic Science Popularization Videos on Social Media in China: Characteristics and Quality Assessment.

IF 1.9
Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum Pub Date : 2026-09-19 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1093/asjof/ojag179
Yarong Chi, Dian Wang, Jing Li, Huiying Gao, Lin Jin, Jin Huang, Jiuzuo Huang, Nanze Yu, Xiao Long
{"title":"Status of Medical Aesthetic Science Popularization Videos on Social Media in China: Characteristics and Quality Assessment.","authors":"Yarong Chi, Dian Wang, Jing Li, Huiying Gao, Lin Jin, Jin Huang, Jiuzuo Huang, Nanze Yu, Xiao Long","doi":"10.1093/asjof/ojag179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical aesthetics science popularization videos have progressively emerged as a crucial channel of information for patients. Therefore, the significance of their scientific rigor and standardization has become increasingly pronounced. Nevertheless, there is a dearth of comprehensive quality evaluation for such videos in China.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluates the current state and quality of such videos on China's 3 major social media platforms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The top 200 videos for 6 key words on 3 major social media platforms were collected. Baseline characteristics and quality evaluation (Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audio-Visual Materials [PEMAT-A/V] score and DISCERN questionnaire) of the videos were gathered. Analyses were conducted on the differences in video quality and baseline information among different social media and content categories. Then, subgroup analysis based on video sources and correlation analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2202 medical aesthetic science popularization videos from 3 major social media platforms (Bilibili, TikTok, and Rednote) and 6 topic terms (medical aesthetics, injectable aesthetics, blepharoplasty, rhinoplasty, fat grafting, and breast surgery) were incorporated into this study. The overall score of such videos was relatively low according to the PEMAT-A/V and DISCERN score. The overall quality of videos on TikTok was relatively higher, followed by that on Bilibili and then on Rednote. Videos related to eye blepharoplasty and rhinoplasty or uploaded by specialists had higher PEMAT-A/V and DISCERN scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The overall quality of these videos in China is currently relatively low. In particular, videos on various platforms showed differences in both content and patterns, and videos, with content related to blepharoplasty and rhinoplasty and those produced by specialists exhibited relatively higher quality. This study elucidates the current state of such videos and further emphasizes the significance of improving the standardization and scientific rigor of medical aesthetics science popularization videos.</p>","PeriodicalId":72118,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum","volume":"8 ","pages":"ojag179"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13660800/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojag179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical aesthetics science popularization videos have progressively emerged as a crucial channel of information for patients. Therefore, the significance of their scientific rigor and standardization has become increasingly pronounced. Nevertheless, there is a dearth of comprehensive quality evaluation for such videos in China.

Objectives: This study evaluates the current state and quality of such videos on China's 3 major social media platforms.

Methods: The top 200 videos for 6 key words on 3 major social media platforms were collected. Baseline characteristics and quality evaluation (Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audio-Visual Materials [PEMAT-A/V] score and DISCERN questionnaire) of the videos were gathered. Analyses were conducted on the differences in video quality and baseline information among different social media and content categories. Then, subgroup analysis based on video sources and correlation analysis was performed.

Results: A total of 2202 medical aesthetic science popularization videos from 3 major social media platforms (Bilibili, TikTok, and Rednote) and 6 topic terms (medical aesthetics, injectable aesthetics, blepharoplasty, rhinoplasty, fat grafting, and breast surgery) were incorporated into this study. The overall score of such videos was relatively low according to the PEMAT-A/V and DISCERN score. The overall quality of videos on TikTok was relatively higher, followed by that on Bilibili and then on Rednote. Videos related to eye blepharoplasty and rhinoplasty or uploaded by specialists had higher PEMAT-A/V and DISCERN scores.

Conclusions: The overall quality of these videos in China is currently relatively low. In particular, videos on various platforms showed differences in both content and patterns, and videos, with content related to blepharoplasty and rhinoplasty and those produced by specialists exhibited relatively higher quality. This study elucidates the current state of such videos and further emphasizes the significance of improving the standardization and scientific rigor of medical aesthetics science popularization videos.

中国社交媒体医学美学科普视频的现状:特点与质量评价
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书