Audiometric Thresholds and Hearing Health Knowledge in Spanish-Speaking English Learner Students: A School-Based Comparative Study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
María Ángel, Heidi Ramrattan, Mary M Flaherty
{"title":"Audiometric Thresholds and Hearing Health Knowledge in Spanish-Speaking English Learner Students: A School-Based Comparative Study.","authors":"María Ángel, Heidi Ramrattan, Mary M Flaherty","doi":"10.1044/2026_AJA-26-00096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined audiometric threshold sensitivity and hearing health knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors (KAB) in Spanish-speaking English learner (EL) students and monolingual English-speaking peers across three central Illinois school districts.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants included 142 children aged 5-17 years (71 non-EL, 71 EL) from elementary, middle, and high schools. Pure-tone air-conduction thresholds were obtained at frequencies from 250 to 8000 Hz following American Speech-Language-Hearing Association-recommended procedures. Middle and high school students completed an adapted KAB survey; all participants completed an open-ended word association task. Linear mixed-effects models examined associations between EL status and thresholds across the frequency range and within the noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) range. Multiple linear regression examined whether KAB scores predicted low-frequency thresholds after controlling for EL status and age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EL students had significantly elevated thresholds relative to non-EL peers, with differences concentrated in the low frequencies (250-500 Hz) and diminishing across higher frequencies, converging by 6000-8000 Hz. Mean thresholds in both groups fell within clinically normal limits. EL status was not associated with thresholds in the NIHL range (3000-6000 Hz), and KAB scores did not predict thresholds.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Spanish-speaking EL students showed systematic low-frequency threshold elevation not attributable to noise exposure or to self-reported hearing health factors. Although differences generally fell within clinically normal limits, even subclinical elevations have been associated with increased listening effort and poorer academic performance, which may be compounded for children simultaneously acquiring English. Findings highlight the need to examine the functional significance of low-frequency threshold differences in linguistically diverse pediatric populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_AJA-26-00096","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study examined audiometric threshold sensitivity and hearing health knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors (KAB) in Spanish-speaking English learner (EL) students and monolingual English-speaking peers across three central Illinois school districts.

Method: Participants included 142 children aged 5-17 years (71 non-EL, 71 EL) from elementary, middle, and high schools. Pure-tone air-conduction thresholds were obtained at frequencies from 250 to 8000 Hz following American Speech-Language-Hearing Association-recommended procedures. Middle and high school students completed an adapted KAB survey; all participants completed an open-ended word association task. Linear mixed-effects models examined associations between EL status and thresholds across the frequency range and within the noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) range. Multiple linear regression examined whether KAB scores predicted low-frequency thresholds after controlling for EL status and age.

Results: EL students had significantly elevated thresholds relative to non-EL peers, with differences concentrated in the low frequencies (250-500 Hz) and diminishing across higher frequencies, converging by 6000-8000 Hz. Mean thresholds in both groups fell within clinically normal limits. EL status was not associated with thresholds in the NIHL range (3000-6000 Hz), and KAB scores did not predict thresholds.

Conclusions: Spanish-speaking EL students showed systematic low-frequency threshold elevation not attributable to noise exposure or to self-reported hearing health factors. Although differences generally fell within clinically normal limits, even subclinical elevations have been associated with increased listening effort and poorer academic performance, which may be compounded for children simultaneously acquiring English. Findings highlight the need to examine the functional significance of low-frequency threshold differences in linguistically diverse pediatric populations.

西班牙语英语学习者听力阈值与听力健康知识:基于学校的比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Audiology
American Journal of Audiology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
163
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: AJA publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to clinical audiology methods and issues, and serves as an outlet for discussion of related professional and educational issues and ideas. The journal is an international outlet for research on clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, management and outcomes of hearing and balance disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. The clinical orientation of the journal allows for the publication of reports on audiology as implemented nationally and internationally, including novel clinical procedures, approaches, and cases. AJA seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of clinical audiology, including audiologic/aural rehabilitation; balance and balance disorders; cultural and linguistic diversity; detection, diagnosis, prevention, habilitation, rehabilitation, and monitoring of hearing loss; hearing aids, cochlear implants, and hearing-assistive technology; hearing disorders; lifespan perspectives on auditory function; speech perception; and tinnitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书