Training general practice/family medicine residents on quality of care improvement and patient safety: a scoping review.

IF 1.2 Q3 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Olga Rafaela Apostolouda, Ioannis Algiounidis, Athina Tatsioni, Ilias Pagkozidis, Ilias Tirodimos, Valter R Fonseca, Joao Breda, Zoi Tsimtsiou
{"title":"Training general practice/family medicine residents on quality of care improvement and patient safety: a scoping review.","authors":"Olga Rafaela Apostolouda, Ioannis Algiounidis, Athina Tatsioni, Ilias Pagkozidis, Ilias Tirodimos, Valter R Fonseca, Joao Breda, Zoi Tsimtsiou","doi":"10.1080/14739879.2026.2726178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Training General Practice/Family Medicine (GP/FM) residents on quality of care (QoC) improvement and patient safety (PS) is expected to significantly contribute to the enhancement of their clinical skills and the promotion of a safety culture in primary care. Despite international initiatives, such as the World Health Organization's Global Patient Safety Action Plan, quality and safety training remains insufficient in many countries.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This scoping review aimed to identify training programs for GP/FM residents focusing on QoC and/or PS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched three databases (PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane) for English-language studies outlining relevant training programs that target GP/FM residents. Two independent researchers conducted data screening and extraction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 1624 articles retrieved, 21 met the inclusion criteria. Most programs originated from the US (<i>n</i> = 17, 80.9%). Among identified curricula, 11 (52.4%) addressed QoC, 7 (33.3%) PS, whilst 3 (14.3%) both QoC/PS. Content heterogeneity was noted, while the majority included core QoC/PS concepts and quality improvement tools. A combination of educational methods was utilised, including didactic lectures, online modules and interactive approaches like simulations, role-playing and group assignments. Program duration varied widely from one month (<i>n</i> = 7, 33.3%) to three years (<i>n</i> = 7, 33.3%). Eight (38.1%) programs incorporated pre- and post-training assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings indicate the limited QoC/PS training opportunities for GP/FM residents and a marked heterogeneity in identified curricula. Aligning with international recommendations and best practices, the development of effective QoC/PS training programs for future GPs is of utmost importance to safeguard, invigorate and advance primary care services of quality and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":46436,"journal":{"name":"Education for Primary Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2026.2726178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Training General Practice/Family Medicine (GP/FM) residents on quality of care (QoC) improvement and patient safety (PS) is expected to significantly contribute to the enhancement of their clinical skills and the promotion of a safety culture in primary care. Despite international initiatives, such as the World Health Organization's Global Patient Safety Action Plan, quality and safety training remains insufficient in many countries.

Aim: This scoping review aimed to identify training programs for GP/FM residents focusing on QoC and/or PS.

Methods: We searched three databases (PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane) for English-language studies outlining relevant training programs that target GP/FM residents. Two independent researchers conducted data screening and extraction.

Results: Out of the 1624 articles retrieved, 21 met the inclusion criteria. Most programs originated from the US (n = 17, 80.9%). Among identified curricula, 11 (52.4%) addressed QoC, 7 (33.3%) PS, whilst 3 (14.3%) both QoC/PS. Content heterogeneity was noted, while the majority included core QoC/PS concepts and quality improvement tools. A combination of educational methods was utilised, including didactic lectures, online modules and interactive approaches like simulations, role-playing and group assignments. Program duration varied widely from one month (n = 7, 33.3%) to three years (n = 7, 33.3%). Eight (38.1%) programs incorporated pre- and post-training assessment.

Conclusions: Findings indicate the limited QoC/PS training opportunities for GP/FM residents and a marked heterogeneity in identified curricula. Aligning with international recommendations and best practices, the development of effective QoC/PS training programs for future GPs is of utmost importance to safeguard, invigorate and advance primary care services of quality and safety.

培训全科医生/家庭医生住院医生提高护理质量和患者安全:范围审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education for Primary Care
Education for Primary Care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Education for Primary Care aims to reflect the best experience, expertise and innovative ideas in the development of undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing primary care education. The journal is UK based but welcomes contributions from all over the world. Readers will benefit from the broader perspectives on educational activities provided through the contributions of all health professionals, including general practitioners, nurses, midwives, health visitors, community nurses and managers. This sharing of experiences has the potential for enhancing healthcare delivery and for promoting interprofessional working.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书