Same-Day Discharge With Early Telehealth Follow-Up After Minimally Invasive Benign Gynecologic and Urogynecologic Surgery: Healthcare Utilization, Safety, and Direct Costs.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Ümran Karabulut Doğan, Erhan Hüseyin Cömert, Erol Karakaş, Kübra Bağcı, Pınar Kadiroğulları, Ozan Doğan
{"title":"Same-Day Discharge With Early Telehealth Follow-Up After Minimally Invasive Benign Gynecologic and Urogynecologic Surgery: Healthcare Utilization, Safety, and Direct Costs.","authors":"Ümran Karabulut Doğan, Erhan Hüseyin Cömert, Erol Karakaş, Kübra Bağcı, Pınar Kadiroğulları, Ozan Doğan","doi":"10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.aeu024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Same-day discharge and early telehealth follow-up are increasingly combined after minimally invasive benign gynecologic and urogynecologic surgery, but pathway-level evidence is limited. We evaluated the observed combination of same-day discharge and a completed telehealth contact within 48-72 hours in relation to 30-day healthcare utilization, direct institutional cost, recovery, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center cohort included 289 consecutive patients treated between January 2023 and April 2026. The comparative cohort comprised 212 patients eligible for same-day discharge; 211 had complete covariate data. Four observed pathways were defined by discharge status and telehealth completion. The primary analysis used generalized propensity-score overlap weighting. Pairwise doubly robust estimators, conventional adjustment, a binary pathway-completion analysis, and a full-cohort model served as supportive or sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The combined pathway was completed by 142 of 212 eligible patients (67.0%). In the primary weighted comparison with no same-day discharge/no telehealth, it was not associated with lower 30-day healthcare utilization (risk ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.47-1.09; <i>p</i> = 0.122). A binary comparison with all other pathways was also null (risk ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.68-1.48; <i>p</i> = 0.987). Pairwise augmented inverse probability weighting and targeted maximum likelihood estimation both yielded a risk ratio of 0.61 (95% confidence interval 0.41-0.81; <i>p</i> < 0.001), but residual imbalance remained, estimates varied by method, and these pairwise estimates are susceptible to exposure-timing bias and are not interpreted as causal. Mean nominal direct cost was 56,601 versus 69,882 Turkish lira (cost ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.83-0.91; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Because the ratio compares contemporaneous groups, it was robust to inflation across the study period. Median time to return to normal activity was 13.25 versus 16.4 days and was descriptive only. Any 30-day safety event occurred in 15.5% versus 28.9% (penalized odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.19-1.02; <i>p</i> = 0.057).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The observed same-day-discharge-plus-telehealth pathway was consistently associated with lower direct institutional cost across analytic approaches, whereas evidence for a reduction in 30-day healthcare utilization was not robust across methods. Given the observational design, potential exposure-timing bias, limited effective sample size, and residual confounding, these associations should not be interpreted as causal effects of the pathway on healthcare utilization or clinical outcomes. No clear excess of short-term adverse events was identified, although safety equivalence was not established. Prospective multicenter studies should account explicitly for the timing of telehealth completion.</p>","PeriodicalId":48852,"journal":{"name":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","volume":"79 8","pages":"1321-1332"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.aeu024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Same-day discharge and early telehealth follow-up are increasingly combined after minimally invasive benign gynecologic and urogynecologic surgery, but pathway-level evidence is limited. We evaluated the observed combination of same-day discharge and a completed telehealth contact within 48-72 hours in relation to 30-day healthcare utilization, direct institutional cost, recovery, and adverse events.

Methods: This retrospective single-center cohort included 289 consecutive patients treated between January 2023 and April 2026. The comparative cohort comprised 212 patients eligible for same-day discharge; 211 had complete covariate data. Four observed pathways were defined by discharge status and telehealth completion. The primary analysis used generalized propensity-score overlap weighting. Pairwise doubly robust estimators, conventional adjustment, a binary pathway-completion analysis, and a full-cohort model served as supportive or sensitivity analyses.

Results: The combined pathway was completed by 142 of 212 eligible patients (67.0%). In the primary weighted comparison with no same-day discharge/no telehealth, it was not associated with lower 30-day healthcare utilization (risk ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.47-1.09; p = 0.122). A binary comparison with all other pathways was also null (risk ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.68-1.48; p = 0.987). Pairwise augmented inverse probability weighting and targeted maximum likelihood estimation both yielded a risk ratio of 0.61 (95% confidence interval 0.41-0.81; p < 0.001), but residual imbalance remained, estimates varied by method, and these pairwise estimates are susceptible to exposure-timing bias and are not interpreted as causal. Mean nominal direct cost was 56,601 versus 69,882 Turkish lira (cost ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.83-0.91; p < 0.001). Because the ratio compares contemporaneous groups, it was robust to inflation across the study period. Median time to return to normal activity was 13.25 versus 16.4 days and was descriptive only. Any 30-day safety event occurred in 15.5% versus 28.9% (penalized odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.19-1.02; p = 0.057).

Conclusions: The observed same-day-discharge-plus-telehealth pathway was consistently associated with lower direct institutional cost across analytic approaches, whereas evidence for a reduction in 30-day healthcare utilization was not robust across methods. Given the observational design, potential exposure-timing bias, limited effective sample size, and residual confounding, these associations should not be interpreted as causal effects of the pathway on healthcare utilization or clinical outcomes. No clear excess of short-term adverse events was identified, although safety equivalence was not established. Prospective multicenter studies should account explicitly for the timing of telehealth completion.

微创良性妇科和泌尿妇科手术后当天出院与早期远程医疗随访:医疗保健利用、安全性和直接成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Archivos Españoles de Urología published since 1944, is an international peer review, susbscription Journal on Urology with original and review articles on different subjets in Urology: oncology, endourology, laparoscopic, andrology, lithiasis, pediatrics , urodynamics,... Case Report are also admitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书