Gabrielle N Pfund, Mathias Allemand, Patrick L Hill, Minxia Luo, Christina Röcke
{"title":"Purpose but not future time perspective predicts momentary affective well-being.","authors":"Gabrielle N Pfund, Mathias Allemand, Patrick L Hill, Minxia Luo, Christina Röcke","doi":"10.1037/pag0001027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Socioemotional selectivity theory suggests that a primary reason older adults have better affective well-being is due to their focus on goals and motives that prioritize their emotional experiences due to a more limited future time perspective (FTP) toward the end of life. There is mixed evidence on whether daily FTP is tied to daily affect and whether this effect remains above and beyond sense of purpose. The present study uses ecological momentary assessment data from 145 older adults residing in Zurich, Switzerland (age: <i>M</i> = 73.33, <i>SD</i> = 5.52, range = 65-91; 48% men, 52% women; all White). Participants completed up to seven momentary surveys throughout the day over 15 days; they reported on purpose at baseline, FTP every evening, and affect throughout the day. Multilevel models indicated that daily FTP was not associated with positive or negative affect at the between- or within-person level, though there were individual differences in these within-person associations. Higher dispositional sense of purpose predicted higher average positive affect and lower average negative affect. These findings highlight that the connection between short-term changes in daily FTP may not matter for many older adults' affective well-being, but older adults' dispositional sense of purpose does. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48426,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Aging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0001027","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Socioemotional selectivity theory suggests that a primary reason older adults have better affective well-being is due to their focus on goals and motives that prioritize their emotional experiences due to a more limited future time perspective (FTP) toward the end of life. There is mixed evidence on whether daily FTP is tied to daily affect and whether this effect remains above and beyond sense of purpose. The present study uses ecological momentary assessment data from 145 older adults residing in Zurich, Switzerland (age: M = 73.33, SD = 5.52, range = 65-91; 48% men, 52% women; all White). Participants completed up to seven momentary surveys throughout the day over 15 days; they reported on purpose at baseline, FTP every evening, and affect throughout the day. Multilevel models indicated that daily FTP was not associated with positive or negative affect at the between- or within-person level, though there were individual differences in these within-person associations. Higher dispositional sense of purpose predicted higher average positive affect and lower average negative affect. These findings highlight that the connection between short-term changes in daily FTP may not matter for many older adults' affective well-being, but older adults' dispositional sense of purpose does. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Psychology and Aging publishes original articles on adult development and aging. Such original articles include reports of research that may be applied, biobehavioral, clinical, educational, experimental (laboratory, field, or naturalistic studies), methodological, or psychosocial. Although the emphasis is on original research investigations, occasional theoretical analyses of research issues, practical clinical problems, or policy may appear, as well as critical reviews of a content area in adult development and aging. Clinical case studies that have theoretical significance are also appropriate. Brief reports are acceptable with the author"s agreement not to submit a full report to another journal.