Associations Among Perceived Stress, Prenatal Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy, and Breastfeeding Intention Among Pregnant Women in Taiwan.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Wen-Chung Wang, Yen-Ju Ho, Ya-Fang Teng
{"title":"Associations Among Perceived Stress, Prenatal Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy, and Breastfeeding Intention Among Pregnant Women in Taiwan.","authors":"Wen-Chung Wang, Yen-Ju Ho, Ya-Fang Teng","doi":"10.1007/s10995-026-04339-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine associations among perceived stress, prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy, and breastfeeding intention among pregnant women in Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 200 pregnant women from a prenatal outpatient clinic in central Taiwan. Participants completed the Perceived Stress Scale, Prenatal Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale, and Infant Feeding Intentions Scale. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple regression analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean scores were 16.37 (SD = 5.15) for perceived stress, 73.25 (SD = 13.08) for prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy, and 9.87 (SD = 3.71) for breastfeeding intention. Perceived stress was negatively correlated with prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy (r = - .36, p < .001) and breastfeeding intention (r = - .18, p = .013), whereas prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy was positively correlated with breastfeeding intention (r = .29, p < .001). In multiple regression, prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy (β = 0.17, p = .018), a prenatal plan to breastfeed (β = 0.49, p < .001), and age (β = 0.12, p = .049) were significantly associated with breastfeeding intention, explaining 35% of the variance. In sensitivity analysis excluding the breastfeeding-plan variable, prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy remained significantly associated with breastfeeding intention (β = 0.29, p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions for practice: </strong>Higher prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy and a prenatal plan to breastfeed were independently associated with stronger breastfeeding intention, whereas perceived stress was associated with weaker intention only in bivariate analyses. Prenatal care may provide opportunities to assess breastfeeding confidence and discuss feeding plans. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether support targeting these factors improves postpartum breastfeeding outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48367,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal and Child Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-026-04339-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To examine associations among perceived stress, prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy, and breastfeeding intention among pregnant women in Taiwan.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 200 pregnant women from a prenatal outpatient clinic in central Taiwan. Participants completed the Perceived Stress Scale, Prenatal Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale, and Infant Feeding Intentions Scale. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple regression analyses were performed.

Results: Mean scores were 16.37 (SD = 5.15) for perceived stress, 73.25 (SD = 13.08) for prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy, and 9.87 (SD = 3.71) for breastfeeding intention. Perceived stress was negatively correlated with prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy (r = - .36, p < .001) and breastfeeding intention (r = - .18, p = .013), whereas prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy was positively correlated with breastfeeding intention (r = .29, p < .001). In multiple regression, prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy (β = 0.17, p = .018), a prenatal plan to breastfeed (β = 0.49, p < .001), and age (β = 0.12, p = .049) were significantly associated with breastfeeding intention, explaining 35% of the variance. In sensitivity analysis excluding the breastfeeding-plan variable, prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy remained significantly associated with breastfeeding intention (β = 0.29, p < .001).

Conclusions for practice: Higher prenatal breastfeeding self-efficacy and a prenatal plan to breastfeed were independently associated with stronger breastfeeding intention, whereas perceived stress was associated with weaker intention only in bivariate analyses. Prenatal care may provide opportunities to assess breastfeeding confidence and discuss feeding plans. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether support targeting these factors improves postpartum breastfeeding outcomes.

台湾孕妇压力感知、产前母乳喂养自我效能感与母乳喂养意向的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Maternal and Child Health Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
271
期刊介绍: Maternal and Child Health Journal is the first exclusive forum to advance the scientific and professional knowledge base of the maternal and child health (MCH) field. This bimonthly provides peer-reviewed papers addressing the following areas of MCH practice, policy, and research: MCH epidemiology, demography, and health status assessment Innovative MCH service initiatives Implementation of MCH programs MCH policy analysis and advocacy MCH professional development. Exploring the full spectrum of the MCH field, Maternal and Child Health Journal is an important tool for practitioners as well as academics in public health, obstetrics, gynecology, prenatal medicine, pediatrics, and neonatology. Sponsors include the Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs (AMCHP), the Association of Teachers of Maternal and Child Health (ATMCH), and CityMatCH.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书