{"title":"Visual Outcomes of Ranibizumab Versus Bevacizumab in Diabetic Retinopathy: An Analytical Study.","authors":"Ayushi Ramesh Devagekar, Shreya Santosh Mote, Rehanbaig Shamshirbaig Jamadar, Revanasiddappa Devarinti","doi":"10.3126/nepjoph.v18i35.82606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is usually treated with Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents. Ranibizumab is an approved drug for ocular use, while bevacizumab has also been introduced as an off-label drug for retinal diseases.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the clinical efficacy and vision related quality of life of ranibizumab and bevacizumab in patients with diabetic retinopathy.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>An analytical study was conducted from 2024 September to 2025 March in the Department of Ophthalmology, KLE's Prabhakar Kore Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Belagavi. Following ethical clearance, 105 subjects (aged ≥35 years) diagnosed with DR were enrolled by universal sampling and divided into two groups A and B. Clinical efficacy was evaluated using Optical Coherence Tomography and Visual Acuity scores and vision-related quality of life through the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire, at baseline and third follow-up.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Central macular thickness decreased in both the Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab groups at the end of the treatment period, but the mean reduction was substantially larger in the Ranibizumab group (282.0 ± 193 µm) than in the Bevacizumab group (343.0 ± 233 µm) (p = 0.040). In terms of visual acuity, the group that received ranibizumab exhibited a considerably higher improvement in logarithm of minimum angle of resolution scores (0.500 ± 0.4 to 0.22 ± 0.1), while the group that received bevacizumab showed a less noticeable improvement (p <0.05) from (0.60 ± 0.3 to 0.50 ± 0.3). Furthermore, the Ranibizumab group's vision-related quality of life, as measured by the composite score, was significantly higher (64.79 ± 18.01) than the Bevacizumab group's (56.53 ± 17.73), indicating both statistically and clinically significant improvements in the functional and psychosocial domains (p = 0.020).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both anti-VEGF agents were effective and safe in diabetic retinopathy; however, ranibizumab demonstrated superior efficacy, faster response, and shorter treatment duration, reinforcing its value for improving both clinical and patient-centred outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":44759,"journal":{"name":"Nepalese Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"18 35","pages":"23-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nepalese Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/nepjoph.v18i35.82606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is usually treated with Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents. Ranibizumab is an approved drug for ocular use, while bevacizumab has also been introduced as an off-label drug for retinal diseases.
Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy and vision related quality of life of ranibizumab and bevacizumab in patients with diabetic retinopathy.
Methodology: An analytical study was conducted from 2024 September to 2025 March in the Department of Ophthalmology, KLE's Prabhakar Kore Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Belagavi. Following ethical clearance, 105 subjects (aged ≥35 years) diagnosed with DR were enrolled by universal sampling and divided into two groups A and B. Clinical efficacy was evaluated using Optical Coherence Tomography and Visual Acuity scores and vision-related quality of life through the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire, at baseline and third follow-up.
Result: Central macular thickness decreased in both the Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab groups at the end of the treatment period, but the mean reduction was substantially larger in the Ranibizumab group (282.0 ± 193 µm) than in the Bevacizumab group (343.0 ± 233 µm) (p = 0.040). In terms of visual acuity, the group that received ranibizumab exhibited a considerably higher improvement in logarithm of minimum angle of resolution scores (0.500 ± 0.4 to 0.22 ± 0.1), while the group that received bevacizumab showed a less noticeable improvement (p <0.05) from (0.60 ± 0.3 to 0.50 ± 0.3). Furthermore, the Ranibizumab group's vision-related quality of life, as measured by the composite score, was significantly higher (64.79 ± 18.01) than the Bevacizumab group's (56.53 ± 17.73), indicating both statistically and clinically significant improvements in the functional and psychosocial domains (p = 0.020).
Conclusion: Both anti-VEGF agents were effective and safe in diabetic retinopathy; however, ranibizumab demonstrated superior efficacy, faster response, and shorter treatment duration, reinforcing its value for improving both clinical and patient-centred outcomes.