Simulation-Based Radiology Training for Medical Technical Assistant Trainees: Quasi-Experimental Study.

IF 13.9 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Matthias J Witti, Joséphine-Charlotte Coleman, Constanze Richters, Johanna Schönberger, Mary-Anne de Ruijter, Alina Stortz, Melanie Bauer, Raisa Kiriakidou, Matthias Stadler
{"title":"Simulation-Based Radiology Training for Medical Technical Assistant Trainees: Quasi-Experimental Study.","authors":"Matthias J Witti, Joséphine-Charlotte Coleman, Constanze Richters, Johanna Schönberger, Mary-Anne de Ruijter, Alina Stortz, Melanie Bauer, Raisa Kiriakidou, Matthias Stadler","doi":"10.2196/97489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simulation-based education is increasingly used in medical training to safely develop clinical skills. However, the perceived relevance of a simulation (\"utility value\") to a learner's future work may influence its effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated a digital radiology simulation module for medical technical assistant trainees in Germany, examining learning gains, group differences in motivational variables, and the moderating role of utility value.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty German medical technical assistant trainees (including 24 specializing in radiology and 26 focused on laboratory medicine) completed a pretest and posttest requiring them to arrange 12 steps of a contrast injection procedure in the correct order. All participants then engaged in an interactive computer simulation of the procedure. After the simulation, trainees rated their self-efficacy, as well as the intrinsic value and perceived utility value of the simulation. Learning gains were analyzed using a mixed-design ANOVA on the Spearman footrule distance composite score, and group differences in motivational variables were tested using independent-sample 2-tailed <i>t</i> tests. The moderating role of utility value on learning gains was examined using a mixed-design analysis of covariance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Trainees showed significant improvement in procedural sequencing from pretest to posttest (<i>F</i><sub>1,48</sub>=22.05; <i>P</i><.001; η<sup>2</sup>=0.103), indicating effective learning across both groups. Radiology-specialized trainees reported higher utility value for the training than laboratory-focused trainees (<i>t</i><sub>46</sub>=4.43; <i>P</i><.001; Cohen <i>d</i>=1.28), whereas no group differences emerged in intrinsic value or self-efficacy. Contrary to our hypothesis, perceived utility value did not significantly moderate learning gains (<i>F</i><sub>1,46</sub>=0.92; <i>P</i>=.34).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The simulation produced robust learning gains regardless of learner specialization or perceived relevance. While utility value perception differed markedly between groups, it did not translate into differential learning outcomes, suggesting that well-designed simulations can be effective across learners with varying levels of task relevance.</p>","PeriodicalId":36236,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Education","volume":"12 ","pages":"e97489"},"PeriodicalIF":13.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13660458/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/97489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Simulation-based education is increasingly used in medical training to safely develop clinical skills. However, the perceived relevance of a simulation ("utility value") to a learner's future work may influence its effectiveness.

Objective: This study evaluated a digital radiology simulation module for medical technical assistant trainees in Germany, examining learning gains, group differences in motivational variables, and the moderating role of utility value.

Methods: Fifty German medical technical assistant trainees (including 24 specializing in radiology and 26 focused on laboratory medicine) completed a pretest and posttest requiring them to arrange 12 steps of a contrast injection procedure in the correct order. All participants then engaged in an interactive computer simulation of the procedure. After the simulation, trainees rated their self-efficacy, as well as the intrinsic value and perceived utility value of the simulation. Learning gains were analyzed using a mixed-design ANOVA on the Spearman footrule distance composite score, and group differences in motivational variables were tested using independent-sample 2-tailed t tests. The moderating role of utility value on learning gains was examined using a mixed-design analysis of covariance.

Results: Trainees showed significant improvement in procedural sequencing from pretest to posttest (F1,48=22.05; P<.001; η2=0.103), indicating effective learning across both groups. Radiology-specialized trainees reported higher utility value for the training than laboratory-focused trainees (t46=4.43; P<.001; Cohen d=1.28), whereas no group differences emerged in intrinsic value or self-efficacy. Contrary to our hypothesis, perceived utility value did not significantly moderate learning gains (F1,46=0.92; P=.34).

Conclusions: The simulation produced robust learning gains regardless of learner specialization or perceived relevance. While utility value perception differed markedly between groups, it did not translate into differential learning outcomes, suggesting that well-designed simulations can be effective across learners with varying levels of task relevance.

基于模拟的医学技术助理实习生放射学培训:准实验研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Medical Education
JMIR Medical Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
54
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书