Measuring Zoo Rhino Personality: Investigating Methods of Assessment and Relationships to Behavior.

IF 1.5 4区 生物学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Zoo Biology Pub Date : 2026-10-14 DOI:10.1002/zoo.70123
Shannon L Watts, Jaime H Martin, Ellen Williams
{"title":"Measuring Zoo Rhino Personality: Investigating Methods of Assessment and Relationships to Behavior.","authors":"Shannon L Watts, Jaime H Martin, Ellen Williams","doi":"10.1002/zoo.70123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Animal personality impacts how animals experience and perceive their surroundings. Understanding how to reliably assess and incorporate animal personality is important for species management. This study aimed to investigate three personality assessment methods in zoo-housed white rhinoceros (response to a novel object, response to a novel sound, and trait ratings by knowledgeable informants), compare the personality profiles generated by these methods and then investigate their relationship to activity budgets to determine instrument validity. This study was undertaken on 12 unrelated Southern white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum simum) (6 male, 6 female) from 4 collections in the United Kingdom (2 zoos and 2 safari parks). Activity budgets were calculated from a total 80 h of behavioral observations (mean ± SD 20 h ± 1 h per collection). Nine of the 12 rhinos interacted with the novel object, whilst only 4 rhinos exhibited a behavioral response (e.g., startle) to the familiar and 5 to the unfamiliar playbacks, respectively. Fourteen keepers across all collections reliably rated 9 of 21 personality adjectives. There were a number of significant correlations between trait ratings and rhino behavior (p < 0.05), although the correlations did not always make clear biological sense. There were no significant correlations between response to novel objects or novel sounds and rhino behavior (p > 0.05). These results suggest the personality tools are capturing different aspects of rhino personality and thus cannot be used interchangeably. Understanding the relationship between rhino personality as assessed using each instrument and observed behavior is important in reliably and efficiently assessing behavior profiles for routine integration into rhino management.</p>","PeriodicalId":24035,"journal":{"name":"Zoo Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zoo Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.70123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Animal personality impacts how animals experience and perceive their surroundings. Understanding how to reliably assess and incorporate animal personality is important for species management. This study aimed to investigate three personality assessment methods in zoo-housed white rhinoceros (response to a novel object, response to a novel sound, and trait ratings by knowledgeable informants), compare the personality profiles generated by these methods and then investigate their relationship to activity budgets to determine instrument validity. This study was undertaken on 12 unrelated Southern white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum simum) (6 male, 6 female) from 4 collections in the United Kingdom (2 zoos and 2 safari parks). Activity budgets were calculated from a total 80 h of behavioral observations (mean ± SD 20 h ± 1 h per collection). Nine of the 12 rhinos interacted with the novel object, whilst only 4 rhinos exhibited a behavioral response (e.g., startle) to the familiar and 5 to the unfamiliar playbacks, respectively. Fourteen keepers across all collections reliably rated 9 of 21 personality adjectives. There were a number of significant correlations between trait ratings and rhino behavior (p < 0.05), although the correlations did not always make clear biological sense. There were no significant correlations between response to novel objects or novel sounds and rhino behavior (p > 0.05). These results suggest the personality tools are capturing different aspects of rhino personality and thus cannot be used interchangeably. Understanding the relationship between rhino personality as assessed using each instrument and observed behavior is important in reliably and efficiently assessing behavior profiles for routine integration into rhino management.

测量动物园犀牛的个性:调查评估方法及其与行为的关系。
动物的个性影响着动物体验和感知周围环境的方式。了解如何可靠地评估和整合动物的个性对物种管理很重要。本研究旨在研究动物园白犀牛的三种人格评估方法(对新物体的反应、对新声音的反应和知识丰富的线人的特征评分),比较这些方法产生的人格特征,然后研究它们与活动预算的关系,以确定工具的效度。本研究对来自英国(2个动物园和2个野生动物园)4个收藏的12头无亲缘关系的南方白犀牛(Ceratotherium simum simum)(6公6母)进行了研究。活动预算根据总共80小时的行为观察计算(每次采集平均±标准差20小时±1小时)。12头犀牛中有9头与新物体互动,而只有4头犀牛对熟悉的回放表现出行为反应(例如,惊吓),5头犀牛对不熟悉的回放表现出行为反应。在所有藏品中,有14位管理员对21个性格形容词中的9个进行了可靠的评价。性状评分与犀牛行为之间存在显著相关性(p 0.05)。这些结果表明,性格工具捕捉的是犀牛性格的不同方面,因此不能互换使用。了解使用每种工具评估的犀牛个性与观察到的行为之间的关系,对于可靠和有效地评估行为概况以将其纳入犀牛管理的日常工作非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zoo Biology
Zoo Biology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Zoo Biology is concerned with reproduction, demographics, genetics, behavior, medicine, husbandry, nutrition, conservation and all empirical aspects of the exhibition and maintenance of wild animals in wildlife parks, zoos, and aquariums. This diverse journal offers a forum for effectively communicating scientific findings, original ideas, and critical thinking related to the role of wildlife collections and their unique contribution to conservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书