Development of a Multivariable Prognostic Model for Risk Stratification in C1 Fractures.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2026-10-12 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005897
Patrick K Cronin, Kaitlyn E Holly, Rishi Virani, Malina O Hatton, Michael D Cesar, Christopher Lai, Samy S Gabriel, Brendan M Striano, James D Kang, Andrew J Schoenfeld
{"title":"Development of a Multivariable Prognostic Model for Risk Stratification in C1 Fractures.","authors":"Patrick K Cronin, Kaitlyn E Holly, Rishi Virani, Malina O Hatton, Michael D Cesar, Christopher Lai, Samy S Gabriel, Brendan M Striano, James D Kang, Andrew J Schoenfeld","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective analysis of adult patients with radiographically confirmed C1 fractures treated across a single healthcare system including multiple level 1 trauma centers and multiple community hospitals (2015-22). The primary outcome was instability. Peri-operative outcomes and complications were also considered.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate radiographic and clinical predictors of instability or surgical management in patients with C1 fractures and to develop a multivariable prognostic model.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Determining instability in C1 fractures remains challenging. Traditional criteria rely heavily on radiographic displacement thresholds, which may not fully capture the multifactorial nature of atlas fracture instability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Demographic, clinical, and radiographic variables were analyzed including lateral mass displacement, dens fracture, neurologic deficit, age, sex, and body mass index. Multivariable Firth penalized logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders and identify factors significantly associated with instability/operative treatment. Receiver operating characteristic analysis assessed model discrimination. A point-based instability risk score was derived from model coefficients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In adjusted analysis of Two hundred and seventy-nine patients, Lateral mass displacement (OR 1.20 per mm, 95% CI 1.09-1.33, P<0.001), dens fracture (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.35-5.38, P=0.0047), and neurologic deficit (OR 5.22, 95% CI 1.69-16.1, P=0.0047) were significantly associated with instability or surgical management. The traditional 7-mm displacement threshold performed poorly (AUC 0.64, P=0.012). The multivariable model demonstrated good discrimination (AUC 0.75. Based on the final multivariable regression model, a point-based instability risk score was derived to estimate patient-specific risk with good predictive accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Instability in C1 fractures was significantly associated with several factors including increasing lateral mass displacement, dens fracture, and neurologic deficit. These parameters outperformed legacy assessment tools based on radiographic measurement. Our prognostic utility demonstrated improved predictive performance and may assist clinicians in risk stratification and treatment decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005897","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective analysis of adult patients with radiographically confirmed C1 fractures treated across a single healthcare system including multiple level 1 trauma centers and multiple community hospitals (2015-22). The primary outcome was instability. Peri-operative outcomes and complications were also considered.

Objective: To evaluate radiographic and clinical predictors of instability or surgical management in patients with C1 fractures and to develop a multivariable prognostic model.

Summary of background data: Determining instability in C1 fractures remains challenging. Traditional criteria rely heavily on radiographic displacement thresholds, which may not fully capture the multifactorial nature of atlas fracture instability.

Methods: Demographic, clinical, and radiographic variables were analyzed including lateral mass displacement, dens fracture, neurologic deficit, age, sex, and body mass index. Multivariable Firth penalized logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders and identify factors significantly associated with instability/operative treatment. Receiver operating characteristic analysis assessed model discrimination. A point-based instability risk score was derived from model coefficients.

Results: In adjusted analysis of Two hundred and seventy-nine patients, Lateral mass displacement (OR 1.20 per mm, 95% CI 1.09-1.33, P<0.001), dens fracture (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.35-5.38, P=0.0047), and neurologic deficit (OR 5.22, 95% CI 1.69-16.1, P=0.0047) were significantly associated with instability or surgical management. The traditional 7-mm displacement threshold performed poorly (AUC 0.64, P=0.012). The multivariable model demonstrated good discrimination (AUC 0.75. Based on the final multivariable regression model, a point-based instability risk score was derived to estimate patient-specific risk with good predictive accuracy.

Conclusions: Instability in C1 fractures was significantly associated with several factors including increasing lateral mass displacement, dens fracture, and neurologic deficit. These parameters outperformed legacy assessment tools based on radiographic measurement. Our prognostic utility demonstrated improved predictive performance and may assist clinicians in risk stratification and treatment decision-making.

C1骨折危险分层的多变量预后模型的建立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书