Franka Buytenhuijs, Cornelia Tune, Thomas C Smits, Andrea Schampel, Lisa-Kristin Schierloh, René Pagel, Jürgen Westermann, Johannes Textor
{"title":"How compartmentalization and proliferation shape the splenic T cell repertoire during an immune response to a complex antigen in mice.","authors":"Franka Buytenhuijs, Cornelia Tune, Thomas C Smits, Andrea Schampel, Lisa-Kristin Schierloh, René Pagel, Jürgen Westermann, Johannes Textor","doi":"10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The adaptive immune system recognizes billions of unique antigens using highly variable T cell receptors (TCRs). To what extent TCR features shape the spatial distribution of the TCR repertoire (TCR-R) within lymphoid organs remains unclear. Here, we compared the TCR-R composition in T cell zones (TCZ), B cell zones (BCZ), and germinal centers (GC) of the spleen by analyzing the complementarity-determining region 3 of the beta chain (CDR3β) in microdissected splenic compartments from naïve and immunized mice. While we found substantial differences in TCR-R composition between these compartments, these differences largely disappeared once the effects of compartment size and proliferation were accounted for: During steady state, the few T cells found in BCZs strongly resemble random subsets of those found in TCZs. After immunization, expanded clones started appearing in the TCZ at day 3 and later shifted to the BCZ. GCs harbored even further expanded clones that were grouped into clusters with high sequence similarity. TCR-R differences during the immune response were well explained by a Galton-Watson model of T cell proliferation, suggesting that this could be the central factor shaping the observed TCR-R differences. Similarly, while TCR length and closeness to germline initially showed more pronounced differences between the compartments, our models of random distribution and proliferation explained these differences almost entirely. Hence, our findings suggest that splenic TCR-Rs are shaped predominantly by compartment size and proliferation rates rather than TCR sequence features. This would imply that quantitative assessment of TCR-R dynamics across heterogeneous spatial compartments during an immune response is only possible when these effects are explicitly accounted for.</p>","PeriodicalId":20241,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Computational Biology","volume":"22 10","pages":"e1014859"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13690269/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Computational Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014859","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The adaptive immune system recognizes billions of unique antigens using highly variable T cell receptors (TCRs). To what extent TCR features shape the spatial distribution of the TCR repertoire (TCR-R) within lymphoid organs remains unclear. Here, we compared the TCR-R composition in T cell zones (TCZ), B cell zones (BCZ), and germinal centers (GC) of the spleen by analyzing the complementarity-determining region 3 of the beta chain (CDR3β) in microdissected splenic compartments from naïve and immunized mice. While we found substantial differences in TCR-R composition between these compartments, these differences largely disappeared once the effects of compartment size and proliferation were accounted for: During steady state, the few T cells found in BCZs strongly resemble random subsets of those found in TCZs. After immunization, expanded clones started appearing in the TCZ at day 3 and later shifted to the BCZ. GCs harbored even further expanded clones that were grouped into clusters with high sequence similarity. TCR-R differences during the immune response were well explained by a Galton-Watson model of T cell proliferation, suggesting that this could be the central factor shaping the observed TCR-R differences. Similarly, while TCR length and closeness to germline initially showed more pronounced differences between the compartments, our models of random distribution and proliferation explained these differences almost entirely. Hence, our findings suggest that splenic TCR-Rs are shaped predominantly by compartment size and proliferation rates rather than TCR sequence features. This would imply that quantitative assessment of TCR-R dynamics across heterogeneous spatial compartments during an immune response is only possible when these effects are explicitly accounted for.
期刊介绍:
PLOS Computational Biology features works of exceptional significance that further our understanding of living systems at all scales—from molecules and cells, to patient populations and ecosystems—through the application of computational methods. Readers include life and computational scientists, who can take the important findings presented here to the next level of discovery.
Research articles must be declared as belonging to a relevant section. More information about the sections can be found in the submission guidelines.
Research articles should model aspects of biological systems, demonstrate both methodological and scientific novelty, and provide profound new biological insights.
Generally, reliability and significance of biological discovery through computation should be validated and enriched by experimental studies. Inclusion of experimental validation is not required for publication, but should be referenced where possible. Inclusion of experimental validation of a modest biological discovery through computation does not render a manuscript suitable for PLOS Computational Biology.
Research articles specifically designated as Methods papers should describe outstanding methods of exceptional importance that have been shown, or have the promise to provide new biological insights. The method must already be widely adopted, or have the promise of wide adoption by a broad community of users. Enhancements to existing published methods will only be considered if those enhancements bring exceptional new capabilities.