Challenges and strategies in the multicultural sexual and reproductive healthcare encounter - a qualitative study on the perspectives of health professionals.
IF 3.4 2区 医学Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
{"title":"Challenges and strategies in the multicultural sexual and reproductive healthcare encounter - a qualitative study on the perspectives of health professionals.","authors":"Mia Appelbäck, Aubry Seery Wredle, Ayanthi Wickramasinghe, Birgitta Essén, Aje Carlbom","doi":"10.1186/s12978-026-02471-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) in Sweden is shaped by strong equity and gender-equality ideals, yet migrant patients continue to experience disparities in SRH outcomes. Social, cultural, and structural factors can complicate clinical encounters, potentially posing obstacles to equitable access. This study explored how SRH professionals experience and manage challenges in multicultural clinical encounters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty‑one SRH professionals (midwives, nurses, physicians, social workers, sexologists, and nursing assistants) from youth and women's health clinics in Skåne were interviewed using semi‑structured interviews. The material was analysed with inductive thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns of challenges and strategies in encounters with patients of foreign background.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four interconnected themes were identified: (1) Navigating Structural Barriers in SRH Care; (2) Family Involvement, Power Dynamics and Autonomy; (3) Person-Centred Care Beyond Cultural Competence; and (4) Structural Opportunities and Constraints in Care. Providers described navigating individual preferences, family relationships, social and religious norms, and structural constraints. They reported using flexible, individualized strategies to support confidentiality, informed decision-making, patient autonomy, and access to care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SRH professionals described multicultural clinical encounters as shaped by intersecting individual, familial, social, and structural factors. Their accounts suggest that equitable SRH care should not rely on individual clinicians adapting to structural barriers. Institutional support for confidential communication, appropriate interpretation, patient-centred decision-making, protection from coercion, accessible health information, and privacy-sensitive digital systems is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":20899,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13662974/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-026-02471-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) in Sweden is shaped by strong equity and gender-equality ideals, yet migrant patients continue to experience disparities in SRH outcomes. Social, cultural, and structural factors can complicate clinical encounters, potentially posing obstacles to equitable access. This study explored how SRH professionals experience and manage challenges in multicultural clinical encounters.
Methods: Thirty‑one SRH professionals (midwives, nurses, physicians, social workers, sexologists, and nursing assistants) from youth and women's health clinics in Skåne were interviewed using semi‑structured interviews. The material was analysed with inductive thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns of challenges and strategies in encounters with patients of foreign background.
Results: Four interconnected themes were identified: (1) Navigating Structural Barriers in SRH Care; (2) Family Involvement, Power Dynamics and Autonomy; (3) Person-Centred Care Beyond Cultural Competence; and (4) Structural Opportunities and Constraints in Care. Providers described navigating individual preferences, family relationships, social and religious norms, and structural constraints. They reported using flexible, individualized strategies to support confidentiality, informed decision-making, patient autonomy, and access to care.
Conclusions: SRH professionals described multicultural clinical encounters as shaped by intersecting individual, familial, social, and structural factors. Their accounts suggest that equitable SRH care should not rely on individual clinicians adapting to structural barriers. Institutional support for confidential communication, appropriate interpretation, patient-centred decision-making, protection from coercion, accessible health information, and privacy-sensitive digital systems is needed.
期刊介绍:
Reproductive Health focuses on all aspects of human reproduction. The journal includes sections dedicated to adolescent health, female fertility and midwifery and all content is open access.
Reproductive health is defined as a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in all matters relating to the reproductive system, at all stages of life. Good reproductive health implies that people are able to have a satisfying and safe sex life, the capability to reproduce and the freedom to decide if, when, and how often to do so. Men and women should be informed about and have access to safe, effective, affordable, and acceptable methods of family planning of their choice, and the right to appropriate health-care services that enable women to safely go through pregnancy and childbirth.