Computerized Cognitive Training in People with Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Eliane Gefen, Nathalie H Launder, Christopher G Davey, Mor Nahum, Yafit Gilboa, Carsten Finke, Hanna Malmberg Gavelin, Nicola T Lautenschlagera, Amit Lampit
{"title":"Computerized Cognitive Training in People with Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.","authors":"Eliane Gefen, Nathalie H Launder, Christopher G Davey, Mor Nahum, Yafit Gilboa, Carsten Finke, Hanna Malmberg Gavelin, Nicola T Lautenschlagera, Amit Lampit","doi":"10.1159/pps/aemag019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cognitive impairment and depression frequently co-occur, exacerbating disability. Identifying accessible interventions to enhance cognition in people with depression is imperative. Computerized cognitive training (CCT) is a potential strategy, but its clinical efficacy across settings remain unclear. We investigated the efficacy of CCT and potential moderators of cognitive and functional outcomes in individuals with depressive symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD42020204209), we searched MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO from inception to June 22, 2026 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of CCT in adults (≥18 years) with clinically significant depressive symptoms. Primary outcome was change in overall cognition. Secondary outcomes included depressive symptoms, psychosocial and daily functioning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three 53 RCTs (3831 participants) were included. CCT was efficacious for overall cognition (49 RCTs, (g=0.23; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.32; τ2=0.095) and depressive symptoms (35 RCTs, g=0.22; 95% CI 0.08 to 0.37; τ2=0.066) with substantial heterogeneity across studies, and did not extend to psychiatric symptoms and daily function. Greater cognitive benefits were associated with multidomain training, higher doses, session durations >30 min, and ≤3 sessions per week. Efficacy was independent of baseline symptom severity, and comparable across delivery modes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CCT can improve cognition, depression and subjective outcomes in people with major or comorbid depression, but efficacy varies across outcomes, settings and intervention design factors. Future work is needed to confirm these factors, and examine what approaches and dose is required to enhance cognitive and functional outcomes of CCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/pps/aemag019","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cognitive impairment and depression frequently co-occur, exacerbating disability. Identifying accessible interventions to enhance cognition in people with depression is imperative. Computerized cognitive training (CCT) is a potential strategy, but its clinical efficacy across settings remain unclear. We investigated the efficacy of CCT and potential moderators of cognitive and functional outcomes in individuals with depressive symptoms.

Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD42020204209), we searched MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO from inception to June 22, 2026 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of CCT in adults (≥18 years) with clinically significant depressive symptoms. Primary outcome was change in overall cognition. Secondary outcomes included depressive symptoms, psychosocial and daily functioning.

Results: Fifty-three 53 RCTs (3831 participants) were included. CCT was efficacious for overall cognition (49 RCTs, (g=0.23; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.32; τ2=0.095) and depressive symptoms (35 RCTs, g=0.22; 95% CI 0.08 to 0.37; τ2=0.066) with substantial heterogeneity across studies, and did not extend to psychiatric symptoms and daily function. Greater cognitive benefits were associated with multidomain training, higher doses, session durations >30 min, and ≤3 sessions per week. Efficacy was independent of baseline symptom severity, and comparable across delivery modes.

Conclusions: CCT can improve cognition, depression and subjective outcomes in people with major or comorbid depression, but efficacy varies across outcomes, settings and intervention design factors. Future work is needed to confirm these factors, and examine what approaches and dose is required to enhance cognitive and functional outcomes of CCT.

抑郁症患者的计算机化认知训练:随机临床试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
29.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics is a reputable journal that has been published since 1953. Over the years, it has gained recognition for its independence, originality, and methodological rigor. The journal has been at the forefront of research in psychosomatic medicine, psychotherapy research, and psychopharmacology, and has contributed to the development of new lines of research in these areas. It is now ranked among the world's most cited journals in the field. As the official journal of the International College of Psychosomatic Medicine and the World Federation for Psychotherapy, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics serves as a platform for discussing current and controversial issues and showcasing innovations in assessment and treatment. It offers a unique forum for cutting-edge thinking at the intersection of medical and behavioral sciences, catering to both practicing clinicians and researchers. The journal is indexed in various databases and platforms such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Previews, Google Scholar, Academic Search, and Health Research Premium Collection, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书