Beyond conventional anthropometry: Muscle-related indicators and muscle strength in adults with congenital heart disease: A retrospective study with a comparison group.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Hyan Ribeiro Prudêncio de Sousa, Cláudia Porto Sabino Pinho
{"title":"Beyond conventional anthropometry: Muscle-related indicators and muscle strength in adults with congenital heart disease: A retrospective study with a comparison group.","authors":"Hyan Ribeiro Prudêncio de Sousa, Cláudia Porto Sabino Pinho","doi":"10.1002/ncp.70194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anthropometric characteristics and muscle strength remain insufficiently characterized in adults with congenital heart disease (CHD). The aim of the study was to characterize anthropometric indicators and muscle strength in hospitalized adults with CHD and examine differences according to cardiac lesion complexity. Exploratory comparisons with adults without CHD were performed as secondary analyses. This cross-sectional study included 109 hospitalized adults with CHD and an external convenience group of 115 adults without CHD. Body mass index (BMI), mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), triceps skinfold thickness (TSF), mid-arm muscle circumference (MAMC), arm muscle area (AMA), corrected arm muscle area (cAMA), and handgrip strength (HGS) were assessed. Cardiac defects were classified as mild, moderate, or complex. Associations of lesion complexity and previous cardiac surgery with anthropometric indicators and HGS were examined using multivariable linear regression. Comparisons with adults without CHD were conducted as exploratory analyses using the same approach. Among adults with CHD, 57.8% had mild, 24.8% moderate, and 17.4% complex defects. Lesion complexity was associated with MAMC (P = 0.032); participants with complex defects had lower MAMC than those with mild defects (B = -2.44 cm; 95% CI: -4.26 to -0.63). Previous cardiac surgery was associated with higher BMI, MUAC, MAMC, and AMA. In adjusted exploratory comparisons, adults with CHD had lower weight, height, BMI, MUAC, MAMC, AMA, and HGS than adults without CHD, whereas TSF was similar. Values below reference ranges for BMI, MUAC, MAMC, cAMA, and HGS were more frequent in CHD. Greater lesion complexity was associated with lower MAMC, whereas previous cardiac surgery was associated with higher BMI, MUAC, MAMC, and AMA. Muscle-related anthropometric measures and HGS may provide complementary information beyond body size and adiposity in adults with CHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19354,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.70194","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anthropometric characteristics and muscle strength remain insufficiently characterized in adults with congenital heart disease (CHD). The aim of the study was to characterize anthropometric indicators and muscle strength in hospitalized adults with CHD and examine differences according to cardiac lesion complexity. Exploratory comparisons with adults without CHD were performed as secondary analyses. This cross-sectional study included 109 hospitalized adults with CHD and an external convenience group of 115 adults without CHD. Body mass index (BMI), mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), triceps skinfold thickness (TSF), mid-arm muscle circumference (MAMC), arm muscle area (AMA), corrected arm muscle area (cAMA), and handgrip strength (HGS) were assessed. Cardiac defects were classified as mild, moderate, or complex. Associations of lesion complexity and previous cardiac surgery with anthropometric indicators and HGS were examined using multivariable linear regression. Comparisons with adults without CHD were conducted as exploratory analyses using the same approach. Among adults with CHD, 57.8% had mild, 24.8% moderate, and 17.4% complex defects. Lesion complexity was associated with MAMC (P = 0.032); participants with complex defects had lower MAMC than those with mild defects (B = -2.44 cm; 95% CI: -4.26 to -0.63). Previous cardiac surgery was associated with higher BMI, MUAC, MAMC, and AMA. In adjusted exploratory comparisons, adults with CHD had lower weight, height, BMI, MUAC, MAMC, AMA, and HGS than adults without CHD, whereas TSF was similar. Values below reference ranges for BMI, MUAC, MAMC, cAMA, and HGS were more frequent in CHD. Greater lesion complexity was associated with lower MAMC, whereas previous cardiac surgery was associated with higher BMI, MUAC, MAMC, and AMA. Muscle-related anthropometric measures and HGS may provide complementary information beyond body size and adiposity in adults with CHD.

超越传统人体测量:先天性心脏病成人的肌肉相关指标和肌肉力量:一项与对照组的回顾性研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.70%
发文量
128
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: NCP is a peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary publication that publishes articles about the scientific basis and clinical application of nutrition and nutrition support. NCP contains comprehensive reviews, clinical research, case observations, and other types of papers written by experts in the field of nutrition and health care practitioners involved in the delivery of specialized nutrition support. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书