Motor intrusion errors as a novel marker of neurodegeneration and executive dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease.

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2026-10-12 DOI:10.1037/neu0001132
Cierra M Keith, Holly E Phelps, Samantha R Smith, Camila Vieira Ligo Teixeira, Rashi I Mehta, Patrick Worhunsky, Melanie Ward, Joseph Malone, Lauren Bojarski, Gary Marano, Khalid Sharif, Stephanie Pockl, Nafiisah Rajabalee, Pierre-François D'Haese, Ali Rezai, Marc W Haut
{"title":"Motor intrusion errors as a novel marker of neurodegeneration and executive dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease.","authors":"Cierra M Keith, Holly E Phelps, Samantha R Smith, Camila Vieira Ligo Teixeira, Rashi I Mehta, Patrick Worhunsky, Melanie Ward, Joseph Malone, Lauren Bojarski, Gary Marano, Khalid Sharif, Stephanie Pockl, Nafiisah Rajabalee, Pierre-François D'Haese, Ali Rezai, Marc W Haut","doi":"10.1037/neu0001132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> With the development of disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer's disease, continued clarification of clinical indicators of disease progression is needed. Based on prior observations of motor intrusion errors in amyloid-positive individuals, we sought to characterize differences in clinical, cognitive, and neuroimaging variables between amyloid-positive participants with and without motor intrusions. <b><i>Method:</i></b> We examined 284 amyloid-positive participants with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia evaluated within a multidisciplinary memory clinic setting. Participants with and without motor intrusion errors were compared across neuropsychological performance variables while controlling for demographic, clinical, and neuroimaging factors. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Participants with motor intrusion errors demonstrated indicators of more progressed disease on clinical and neuroimaging markers. After controlling for these variables, greater executive dysfunction was observed in participants with motor intrusions with effect sizes ranging from small (η<sub>p</sub>² = .02) to medium (η<sub>p</sub>² = .12). Differences in performances on memory, naming, and basic processing speed tasks were not observed between the groups. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Overall, the results of the present study suggest that the presence of a motor intrusion error may be associated with greater clinical impairment and, more specifically, executive dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":19205,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0001132","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: With the development of disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer's disease, continued clarification of clinical indicators of disease progression is needed. Based on prior observations of motor intrusion errors in amyloid-positive individuals, we sought to characterize differences in clinical, cognitive, and neuroimaging variables between amyloid-positive participants with and without motor intrusions. Method: We examined 284 amyloid-positive participants with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia evaluated within a multidisciplinary memory clinic setting. Participants with and without motor intrusion errors were compared across neuropsychological performance variables while controlling for demographic, clinical, and neuroimaging factors. Results: Participants with motor intrusion errors demonstrated indicators of more progressed disease on clinical and neuroimaging markers. After controlling for these variables, greater executive dysfunction was observed in participants with motor intrusions with effect sizes ranging from small (ηp² = .02) to medium (ηp² = .12). Differences in performances on memory, naming, and basic processing speed tasks were not observed between the groups. Conclusions: Overall, the results of the present study suggest that the presence of a motor intrusion error may be associated with greater clinical impairment and, more specifically, executive dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

运动侵入错误是阿尔茨海默病神经变性和执行功能障碍的新标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychology
Neuropsychology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychology publishes original, empirical research; systematic reviews and meta-analyses; and theoretical articles on the relation between brain and human cognitive, emotional, and behavioral function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书