Cognitive assessment of patients with post-COVID olfactory dysfunction and impaired domains.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
David Dylan García-Meléndez, Daniel Maroto Navas, José Piernagorda Copado, Rocío Martín Álvarez, María Del Río Ruiz, María Isabel Morales-Casado
{"title":"Cognitive assessment of patients with post-COVID olfactory dysfunction and impaired domains.","authors":"David Dylan García-Meléndez, Daniel Maroto Navas, José Piernagorda Copado, Rocío Martín Álvarez, María Del Río Ruiz, María Isabel Morales-Casado","doi":"10.1007/s10072-026-09446-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persistent olfactory dysfunction is a common symptom of post-COVID syndrome (PCS), particularly among younger patients who experienced mild COVID-19. Recent functional neuroimaging studies suggest that persistent olfactory impairment may be associated with cognitive deficits. However, few studies have characterised cognition in this subgroup using standardised neuropsychological assessment.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the prevalence of cognitive deficits and their characteristics in patients with persistent post-COVID olfactory symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre study included 55 patients with PCS and persistent olfactory dysfunction following COVID-19 onset before February 2021. Participants underwent olfactory evaluation using the Sniffin' Sticks test and a comprehensive battery of neuropsychological assessments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 43.9 years (SD 10.1), with a mean disease duration of 46.1 months (SD 6.5). According to a domain-based criterion, 67.3% of patients showed cognitive impairment. Domain-specific impairment was observed in attention/working memory (67.3%), executive function (50.9%), and episodic memory (56.4%). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) detected abnormalities in only 9.1% of patients. Exploratory comparisons between hyposmic and anosmic patients showed no univariate differences after false discovery rate (FDR) correction, despite a marginal post-hoc multivariate effect. Continuous olfactory performance showed inverse correlations with two executive measures after FDR correction, but no consistent dose-response relationship across cognitive measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this selected cohort, a high prevalence of multidomain cognitive alterations was observed. These findings highlight the limitations of brief cognitive screening tools and suggest a complex relationship between persistent olfactory dysfunction and cognition. Further longitudinal studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":"47 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-026-09446-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Persistent olfactory dysfunction is a common symptom of post-COVID syndrome (PCS), particularly among younger patients who experienced mild COVID-19. Recent functional neuroimaging studies suggest that persistent olfactory impairment may be associated with cognitive deficits. However, few studies have characterised cognition in this subgroup using standardised neuropsychological assessment.

Objectives: To assess the prevalence of cognitive deficits and their characteristics in patients with persistent post-COVID olfactory symptoms.

Methods: This multicentre study included 55 patients with PCS and persistent olfactory dysfunction following COVID-19 onset before February 2021. Participants underwent olfactory evaluation using the Sniffin' Sticks test and a comprehensive battery of neuropsychological assessments.

Results: The mean age was 43.9 years (SD 10.1), with a mean disease duration of 46.1 months (SD 6.5). According to a domain-based criterion, 67.3% of patients showed cognitive impairment. Domain-specific impairment was observed in attention/working memory (67.3%), executive function (50.9%), and episodic memory (56.4%). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) detected abnormalities in only 9.1% of patients. Exploratory comparisons between hyposmic and anosmic patients showed no univariate differences after false discovery rate (FDR) correction, despite a marginal post-hoc multivariate effect. Continuous olfactory performance showed inverse correlations with two executive measures after FDR correction, but no consistent dose-response relationship across cognitive measures.

Conclusion: In this selected cohort, a high prevalence of multidomain cognitive alterations was observed. These findings highlight the limitations of brief cognitive screening tools and suggest a complex relationship between persistent olfactory dysfunction and cognition. Further longitudinal studies are warranted.

新冠肺炎后嗅觉功能障碍患者的认知评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurological Sciences
Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
743
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书