ACR TI-RADS Modified by CEUS Features and Nodule Location for Diagnosis and Biopsy Decision in Thyroid Nodules of TR4 or Higher.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Shuo Wang, Xianquan Shi, He Ren, Ran Yi, Qiuya Yang, Taohua Gou, Lei Cai, Yan Zhang, Yukun Luo
{"title":"ACR TI-RADS Modified by CEUS Features and Nodule Location for Diagnosis and Biopsy Decision in Thyroid Nodules of TR4 or Higher.","authors":"Shuo Wang, Xianquan Shi, He Ren, Ran Yi, Qiuya Yang, Taohua Gou, Lei Cai, Yan Zhang, Yukun Luo","doi":"10.1002/jum.70491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop a modified American College of Radiology (ACR) thyroid imaging, reporting and data system (TI-RADS) incorporating contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features and nodule location to improve diagnostic performance and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) recommendations for ACR TR4 or higher thyroid nodules.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study enrolled patients who underwent ultrasound and CEUS at 3 hospitals between June 2024 and January 2026. CEUS and location features were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression to construct the modified system. Diagnostic performance and biopsy recommendation efficiency were compared with ACR TI-RADS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred and eight patients with 442 nodules were included. Independent predictors included enhancement intensity, enhancement direction, ring enhancement, enhancement area and nodule location. In the training set (n = 334), the modified system achieved higher AUC and sensitivity than ACR TI-RADS (AUC: 0.90 [95% CI: 0.86-0.93] versus 0.75 [95% CI: 0.71-0.79]; sensitivity: 88.5% versus 60.3%; p < .01), higher accuracy of malignant nodule biopsies (AMB: 67.1% versus 49.4%), lower unnecessary biopsy rate (UBR: 32.9% versus 50.6%), and lower biopsy rate of benign nodules (BRB: 20.8% versus 31.2%), with no unsafe downgrading. Similar results were observed in the temporal validation set (n = 108): AUC 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90-0.99) versus 0.73 (95% CI: 0.66-0.79); sensitivity 87.0% versus 49.3%; AMB 83.3% versus 53.3%; UBR 16.7% versus 46.7%, and BRB 5.1% versus 17.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A modified ACR TI-RADS integrating CEUS features and nodule location improved diagnostic performance and FNA recommendations for ACR TR4 or higher nodules. Pending external validation, this system may provide a practical approach for refining risk stratification and reducing unnecessary biopsies.</p>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.70491","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To develop a modified American College of Radiology (ACR) thyroid imaging, reporting and data system (TI-RADS) incorporating contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features and nodule location to improve diagnostic performance and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) recommendations for ACR TR4 or higher thyroid nodules.

Methods: This prospective study enrolled patients who underwent ultrasound and CEUS at 3 hospitals between June 2024 and January 2026. CEUS and location features were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression to construct the modified system. Diagnostic performance and biopsy recommendation efficiency were compared with ACR TI-RADS.

Results: Four hundred and eight patients with 442 nodules were included. Independent predictors included enhancement intensity, enhancement direction, ring enhancement, enhancement area and nodule location. In the training set (n = 334), the modified system achieved higher AUC and sensitivity than ACR TI-RADS (AUC: 0.90 [95% CI: 0.86-0.93] versus 0.75 [95% CI: 0.71-0.79]; sensitivity: 88.5% versus 60.3%; p < .01), higher accuracy of malignant nodule biopsies (AMB: 67.1% versus 49.4%), lower unnecessary biopsy rate (UBR: 32.9% versus 50.6%), and lower biopsy rate of benign nodules (BRB: 20.8% versus 31.2%), with no unsafe downgrading. Similar results were observed in the temporal validation set (n = 108): AUC 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90-0.99) versus 0.73 (95% CI: 0.66-0.79); sensitivity 87.0% versus 49.3%; AMB 83.3% versus 53.3%; UBR 16.7% versus 46.7%, and BRB 5.1% versus 17.9%.

Conclusions: A modified ACR TI-RADS integrating CEUS features and nodule location improved diagnostic performance and FNA recommendations for ACR TR4 or higher nodules. Pending external validation, this system may provide a practical approach for refining risk stratification and reducing unnecessary biopsies.

基于超声造影特征和结节位置的ACR TI-RADS在TR4及以上甲状腺结节诊断和活检中的应用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
205
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community. Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to: -Basic Science- Breast Ultrasound- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound- Dermatology- Echocardiography- Elastography- Emergency Medicine- Fetal Echocardiography- Gastrointestinal Ultrasound- General and Abdominal Ultrasound- Genitourinary Ultrasound- Gynecologic Ultrasound- Head and Neck Ultrasound- High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging- Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound- Neurosonology- Obstetric Ultrasound- Ophthalmologic Ultrasound- Pediatric Ultrasound- Point-of-Care Ultrasound- Public Policy- Superficial Structures- Therapeutic Ultrasound- Ultrasound Education- Ultrasound in Global Health- Urologic Ultrasound- Vascular Ultrasound
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书