Strategies to increase participant diversity in pediatric research: a systematic review.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Ian J Litchfield, Olga Boiko, Rocco Sheldon, Veer Sheth, Thesanya Wijewickreme Perera, Sheila M Greenfield, Renuka P Dias
{"title":"Strategies to increase participant diversity in pediatric research: a systematic review.","authors":"Ian J Litchfield, Olga Boiko, Rocco Sheldon, Veer Sheth, Thesanya Wijewickreme Perera, Sheila M Greenfield, Renuka P Dias","doi":"10.1038/s41390-026-05536-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple strategies have been introduced to improve research recruitment and retention of underserved children and young people (CYP) with long-term conditions. For the first time, this systematic review presents a structured description of CYP and caregiver preferences for these strategies and collates evidence of their impact on participation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched. Studies were included from the inception of the database to September 2025 if they were undertaken in a high-income country, with CYP under 19 years with a long-term condition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We assessed 16,727 records and included 21 studies published between 1998 and 2024, all based in the USA, predominantly drawn from African American and Latino populations. We determined preferences for the positive impact of the use of familiar venues and culturally attuned community events for study activities; communication that was bilingual, used educational games or social media; reliable and equitable relationships with study facilitators; and the co-production of recruitment strategies and study interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was a lack of comparative evidence across individual approaches. The time and resources needed to build awareness, trust, and facilitate research participation in underserved CYP need broader acknowledgement from funders and policymakers.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>The review highlights how building trust, maintaining contact, and using familiar language and venues for study activities can improve research recruitment and retention in under-researched children and young people. The additional time and resources required to increase the diversity of children and young people participating in research need to be understood by funding bodies. The review's structured description of recruitment and retention strategies and their comparative effectiveness provides valuable and practical insight for those wishing to diversify research participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19829,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-026-05536-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multiple strategies have been introduced to improve research recruitment and retention of underserved children and young people (CYP) with long-term conditions. For the first time, this systematic review presents a structured description of CYP and caregiver preferences for these strategies and collates evidence of their impact on participation.

Methods: The Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched. Studies were included from the inception of the database to September 2025 if they were undertaken in a high-income country, with CYP under 19 years with a long-term condition.

Results: We assessed 16,727 records and included 21 studies published between 1998 and 2024, all based in the USA, predominantly drawn from African American and Latino populations. We determined preferences for the positive impact of the use of familiar venues and culturally attuned community events for study activities; communication that was bilingual, used educational games or social media; reliable and equitable relationships with study facilitators; and the co-production of recruitment strategies and study interventions.

Conclusions: There was a lack of comparative evidence across individual approaches. The time and resources needed to build awareness, trust, and facilitate research participation in underserved CYP need broader acknowledgement from funders and policymakers.

Impact: The review highlights how building trust, maintaining contact, and using familiar language and venues for study activities can improve research recruitment and retention in under-researched children and young people. The additional time and resources required to increase the diversity of children and young people participating in research need to be understood by funding bodies. The review's structured description of recruitment and retention strategies and their comparative effectiveness provides valuable and practical insight for those wishing to diversify research participation.

增加儿科研究参与者多样性的策略:一项系统综述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Research
Pediatric Research 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
473
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Research publishes original papers, invited reviews, and commentaries on the etiologies of children''s diseases and disorders of development, extending from molecular biology to epidemiology. Use of model organisms and in vitro techniques relevant to developmental biology and medicine are acceptable, as are translational human studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书