The Patients' Voice in Clostridioides difficile Infection: Large Language Model-Assisted Thematic Analysis of Patient Testimonials.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2026-10-08 eCollection Date: 2026-10-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofag650
Javier A Villafuerte-Gálvez, Marco A Noriega, Sena Cakir Colak, Carl V Crawford
{"title":"The Patients' Voice in <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> Infection: Large Language Model-Assisted Thematic Analysis of Patient Testimonials.","authors":"Javier A Villafuerte-Gálvez, Marco A Noriega, Sena Cakir Colak, Carl V Crawford","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofag650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong><i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection (CDI) imposes a burden that extends well beyond the gastrointestinal tract, yet existing outcome measures only partially capture the patient experience. We used frontier large language models (LLMs) on patient and caregiver narratives at scale to describe how burden shifts with disease course.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 189 testimonials from the Peggy Lillis Foundation corpus, sorted into 4 cohorts with recurrence (<i>r</i>) and fulminant (<i>f</i>) severity as axes (rfCDI, fCDI, rCDI, non-rfCDI). Two independent LLMs coded 8 thematic domains, 4 fulminant flags, 13 emerging semantic fields, the dominant dimension, and narrative arcs. Two physicians independently coded a subset for inter-rater reliability (PABAK, Gwet's AC1).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatment trajectory was the dominant theme in recurrent disease, whereas death and near-death dominated nonrecurrent fulminant narratives. Psychological burden was near-universal in fulminant disease (98.0% in rfCDI, 97.2% in fCDI). Caregiver and bereavement content concentrated in fCDI (66.7%). Diagnostic failure was frequent across recurrent cohorts (47.6-56.1%). Mentions of bacteriotherapy (fecal microbiota transplantation) concentrated in recurrent cohorts (60.2% rfCDI versus 5.6% fCDI). Financial, mental-health, and caregiver burdens were prominent and remain largely unaddressed by guidelines. Human-human reliability was substantial (PABAK 0.79 for semantic fields, 0.76 for domains); arc coding was least reliable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient narratives reveal a course-dependent, multidimensional burden in CDI. Concrete gaps exist between what patients prioritize, what guidelines recommend, and what therapy access provides. Frontier-LLM coding, validated against clinicians, offers a reproducible route to translate these priorities into research, care, and policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"13 10","pages":"ofag650"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13660696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofag650","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) imposes a burden that extends well beyond the gastrointestinal tract, yet existing outcome measures only partially capture the patient experience. We used frontier large language models (LLMs) on patient and caregiver narratives at scale to describe how burden shifts with disease course.

Methods: We analyzed 189 testimonials from the Peggy Lillis Foundation corpus, sorted into 4 cohorts with recurrence (r) and fulminant (f) severity as axes (rfCDI, fCDI, rCDI, non-rfCDI). Two independent LLMs coded 8 thematic domains, 4 fulminant flags, 13 emerging semantic fields, the dominant dimension, and narrative arcs. Two physicians independently coded a subset for inter-rater reliability (PABAK, Gwet's AC1).

Results: Treatment trajectory was the dominant theme in recurrent disease, whereas death and near-death dominated nonrecurrent fulminant narratives. Psychological burden was near-universal in fulminant disease (98.0% in rfCDI, 97.2% in fCDI). Caregiver and bereavement content concentrated in fCDI (66.7%). Diagnostic failure was frequent across recurrent cohorts (47.6-56.1%). Mentions of bacteriotherapy (fecal microbiota transplantation) concentrated in recurrent cohorts (60.2% rfCDI versus 5.6% fCDI). Financial, mental-health, and caregiver burdens were prominent and remain largely unaddressed by guidelines. Human-human reliability was substantial (PABAK 0.79 for semantic fields, 0.76 for domains); arc coding was least reliable.

Conclusions: Patient narratives reveal a course-dependent, multidimensional burden in CDI. Concrete gaps exist between what patients prioritize, what guidelines recommend, and what therapy access provides. Frontier-LLM coding, validated against clinicians, offers a reproducible route to translate these priorities into research, care, and policy.

艰难梭菌感染患者的声音:大语言模型辅助患者证词的主题分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书