Ling Zhou, Yuxuan Liu, Xinyi Liu, Xin Lin, Wei-Tao Liu
{"title":"Distinguishing electrostatic from ion-specific effects at charged oxide/water interfaces by sum-frequency spectroscopy.","authors":"Ling Zhou, Yuxuan Liu, Xinyi Liu, Xin Lin, Wei-Tao Liu","doi":"10.1063/5.0349446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Charged aqueous interfaces are ubiquitous, yet the ionic modulation of interfacial reactions is often empirically related to the bulk ion concentration without distinguishing pure electrostatic screening from ion-specific interactions. The Gouy-Chapman-Stern (GCS) model provides a mean-field description of the surface charge and ion distributions at such electrified interfaces, but direct experimental validation at the molecular level remains scarce. Here, we combine in situ sum-frequency spectroscopy of surface lattice vibrations with the modified Poisson-Boltzmann formalism to spectroscopically disentangle various ionic effects. Using the benchmark silica/water interface in NaCl solutions as a model system, we calibrated experimental deprotonation rates of surface silanol groups against the calculated surface proton concentrations. Below the Na+ concentration of ∼2 M, the apparent ion-induced acceleration of deprotonation is fully accounted for by electrostatic screening alone, with ion concentration dependence essentially reflecting the change in surface proton concentration. Above this threshold, the GCS model breaks down as ions specifically perturb the surface structure, causing the deprotonation rate to exceed the electrostatic prediction. This framework is further examined by calculations across different pKa values, ionic valences, and oxide species, providing a general basis for interpreting interfacial ionic effects beyond the mean-field limit.</p>","PeriodicalId":15313,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Physics","volume":"165 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0349446","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Charged aqueous interfaces are ubiquitous, yet the ionic modulation of interfacial reactions is often empirically related to the bulk ion concentration without distinguishing pure electrostatic screening from ion-specific interactions. The Gouy-Chapman-Stern (GCS) model provides a mean-field description of the surface charge and ion distributions at such electrified interfaces, but direct experimental validation at the molecular level remains scarce. Here, we combine in situ sum-frequency spectroscopy of surface lattice vibrations with the modified Poisson-Boltzmann formalism to spectroscopically disentangle various ionic effects. Using the benchmark silica/water interface in NaCl solutions as a model system, we calibrated experimental deprotonation rates of surface silanol groups against the calculated surface proton concentrations. Below the Na+ concentration of ∼2 M, the apparent ion-induced acceleration of deprotonation is fully accounted for by electrostatic screening alone, with ion concentration dependence essentially reflecting the change in surface proton concentration. Above this threshold, the GCS model breaks down as ions specifically perturb the surface structure, causing the deprotonation rate to exceed the electrostatic prediction. This framework is further examined by calculations across different pKa values, ionic valences, and oxide species, providing a general basis for interpreting interfacial ionic effects beyond the mean-field limit.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chemical Physics publishes quantitative and rigorous science of long-lasting value in methods and applications of chemical physics. The Journal also publishes brief Communications of significant new findings, Perspectives on the latest advances in the field, and Special Topic issues. The Journal focuses on innovative research in experimental and theoretical areas of chemical physics, including spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, and quantum mechanics. In addition, topical areas such as polymers, soft matter, materials, surfaces/interfaces, and systems of biological relevance are of increasing importance.
Topical coverage includes:
Theoretical Methods and Algorithms
Advanced Experimental Techniques
Atoms, Molecules, and Clusters
Liquids, Glasses, and Crystals
Surfaces, Interfaces, and Materials
Polymers and Soft Matter
Biological Molecules and Networks.