Benchmarking 3D U-Net variants for volumetric segmentation of the substantia nigra and brain ageing related analysis using 7T MRI.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Ajay Kumar Haridhas, Lenin Fred Alfred
{"title":"Benchmarking 3D U-Net variants for volumetric segmentation of the substantia nigra and brain ageing related analysis using 7T MRI.","authors":"Ajay Kumar Haridhas, Lenin Fred Alfred","doi":"10.1080/00207454.2026.2749809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Accurate segmentation of the substantia nigra (SN) is essential for assessing its structural integrity and volumetric changes in Parkinson's disease and brain aging. However, it remains challenging due to SN's small size, deep location, and low contrast on conventional MRI. This study benchmarked six U-Net variants baseline 3D U-Net, ResU-Net, SE-U-Net, Attention U-Net, U-Net++, and U-Net 3+ for SN segmentation using ultra-high-field 7 T MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>T1-weighted MP2RAGE images from the ATAG dataset (53 healthy subjects: 31 train, 7 validation and 15 test). Six architectures were evaluated: 3D U-Net, ResU-Net, SE-U-Net, Attention U-Net, U-Net++, and U-Net 3+.Performance was evalauted with Dice score, IoU, 95% HD95, ASSD, and also age-stratified analysis was considered for analysing the robustness of model across young, middle-aged, and elderly cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While ResU-Net achieved the highest overlap metrics (Dice = 0.763, IoU = 0.618), where the baseline 3D U-Net outperformed all variants in boundary accuracy (HD95 = 13.85 mm, ASSD = 20.15 mm). The U-Net 3+ and SE-U-Net complex models relatively underperformed, indicated that architectural complexity does not enhance the segmentation performance of small subcortical structures. Descriptive Age-stratified analysis shows, ResU-Net maintained consistent performance across different age groups and 3D U-Net revealed strong age-invariance, however no statistically significant age-group differences were exhibited.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study findings demonstrates architecture selection influences overlap, boundary detection and volume estimation small-structure segmentation and highlights the importance of evaluating model robustness to demographic variability. The findings offer a methodological benchmark for developing reliable SN volumetry tools for neurodegenerative research.</p>","PeriodicalId":14161,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207454.2026.2749809","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Accurate segmentation of the substantia nigra (SN) is essential for assessing its structural integrity and volumetric changes in Parkinson's disease and brain aging. However, it remains challenging due to SN's small size, deep location, and low contrast on conventional MRI. This study benchmarked six U-Net variants baseline 3D U-Net, ResU-Net, SE-U-Net, Attention U-Net, U-Net++, and U-Net 3+ for SN segmentation using ultra-high-field 7 T MRI.

Methods: T1-weighted MP2RAGE images from the ATAG dataset (53 healthy subjects: 31 train, 7 validation and 15 test). Six architectures were evaluated: 3D U-Net, ResU-Net, SE-U-Net, Attention U-Net, U-Net++, and U-Net 3+.Performance was evalauted with Dice score, IoU, 95% HD95, ASSD, and also age-stratified analysis was considered for analysing the robustness of model across young, middle-aged, and elderly cohorts.

Results: While ResU-Net achieved the highest overlap metrics (Dice = 0.763, IoU = 0.618), where the baseline 3D U-Net outperformed all variants in boundary accuracy (HD95 = 13.85 mm, ASSD = 20.15 mm). The U-Net 3+ and SE-U-Net complex models relatively underperformed, indicated that architectural complexity does not enhance the segmentation performance of small subcortical structures. Descriptive Age-stratified analysis shows, ResU-Net maintained consistent performance across different age groups and 3D U-Net revealed strong age-invariance, however no statistically significant age-group differences were exhibited.

Conclusions: This study findings demonstrates architecture selection influences overlap, boundary detection and volume estimation small-structure segmentation and highlights the importance of evaluating model robustness to demographic variability. The findings offer a methodological benchmark for developing reliable SN volumetry tools for neurodegenerative research.

使用7T MRI对黑质体积分割和脑老化相关分析的3D U-Net变体进行基准测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
132
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Neuroscience publishes original research articles, reviews, brief scientific reports, case studies, letters to the editor and book reviews concerned with problems of the nervous system and related clinical studies, epidemiology, neuropathology, medical and surgical treatment options and outcomes, neuropsychology and other topics related to the research and care of persons with neurologic disorders.  The focus of the journal is clinical and transitional research. Topics covered include but are not limited to: ALS, ataxia, autism, brain tumors, child neurology, demyelinating diseases, epilepsy, genetics, headache, lysosomal storage disease, mitochondrial dysfunction, movement disorders, multiple sclerosis, myopathy, neurodegenerative diseases, neuromuscular disorders, neuropharmacology, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, pain, sleep disorders, stroke, and other areas related to the neurosciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书