Postoperative Wound Care in Mohs Micrographic Surgery: Tradition, Variation, and the Evidence.

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Meredith Hengy, George M Jeha, Umer Nadir, Stanislav N Tolkachjov
{"title":"Postoperative Wound Care in Mohs Micrographic Surgery: Tradition, Variation, and the Evidence.","authors":"Meredith Hengy, George M Jeha, Umer Nadir, Stanislav N Tolkachjov","doi":"10.1111/ijd.70728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Postoperative wound care following Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) has high variability and surprisingly limited real-world evidence. Despite over one million MMS procedures performed annually in the United States, recommendations for topical agents, pressure dressings, wound cleansing, dressing change frequency, activity restrictions, and wound check intervals vary substantially across practices and are frequently based on training tradition rather than clinical data. This narrative review critically evaluates 15 common post-Mohs wound care practices, characterizing the evidence quality for each. Six practices are supported by at least Level III evidence, most notably plain petrolatum over topical antibiotics and over multi-ingredient ointments such as Aquaphor, gentle soap-and-water cleansing, the safety of early showering, targeted acetic acid soaks for hypergranulation tissue, and virtual wound checks. Evidence discourages cytotoxic antiseptics such as hydrogen peroxide and Dakin's solution. Most other common postoperative practices, including pressure dressings, activity restrictions, and dressing change frequency, remain understudied in MMS. Standardizing established practices while transparently acknowledging areas of uncertainty may reduce patient confusion, improve outcomes, and highlight priorities for future prospective research in dermatologic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":13950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.70728","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Postoperative wound care following Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) has high variability and surprisingly limited real-world evidence. Despite over one million MMS procedures performed annually in the United States, recommendations for topical agents, pressure dressings, wound cleansing, dressing change frequency, activity restrictions, and wound check intervals vary substantially across practices and are frequently based on training tradition rather than clinical data. This narrative review critically evaluates 15 common post-Mohs wound care practices, characterizing the evidence quality for each. Six practices are supported by at least Level III evidence, most notably plain petrolatum over topical antibiotics and over multi-ingredient ointments such as Aquaphor, gentle soap-and-water cleansing, the safety of early showering, targeted acetic acid soaks for hypergranulation tissue, and virtual wound checks. Evidence discourages cytotoxic antiseptics such as hydrogen peroxide and Dakin's solution. Most other common postoperative practices, including pressure dressings, activity restrictions, and dressing change frequency, remain understudied in MMS. Standardizing established practices while transparently acknowledging areas of uncertainty may reduce patient confusion, improve outcomes, and highlight priorities for future prospective research in dermatologic surgery.

莫氏显微手术的术后伤口护理:传统、变异和证据。
莫氏显微摄影手术(MMS)术后伤口护理具有很高的可变性和令人惊讶的有限的现实证据。尽管在美国每年进行的MMS手术超过100万例,但对于局部用药、压力敷料、伤口清洁、换药频率、活动限制和伤口检查间隔的建议在不同的实践中存在很大差异,并且经常基于培训传统而不是临床数据。这篇叙述性综述批判性地评估了15种常见的后莫氏伤口护理实践,并描述了每种实践的证据质量。至少有III级证据支持六种做法,最明显的是普通凡士林,而不是局部抗生素和多成分软膏,如Aquaphor,温和的肥皂和水清洁,早期淋浴的安全性,针对肉芽组织的醋酸浸泡,以及虚拟伤口检查。有证据表明,双氧水和达金溶液等细胞毒性防腐剂不适合使用。大多数其他常见的术后操作,包括压力敷料、活动限制和敷料更换频率,在MMS中仍未得到充分研究。标准化已建立的做法,同时透明地承认不确定的领域可能会减少患者的困惑,改善结果,并突出未来皮肤外科前瞻性研究的优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
2.80%
发文量
476
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Published monthly, the International Journal of Dermatology is specifically designed to provide dermatologists around the world with a regular, up-to-date source of information on all aspects of the diagnosis and management of skin diseases. Accepted articles regularly cover clinical trials; education; morphology; pharmacology and therapeutics; case reports, and reviews. Additional features include tropical medical reports, news, correspondence, proceedings and transactions, and education. The International Journal of Dermatology is guided by a distinguished, international editorial board and emphasizes a global approach to continuing medical education for physicians and other providers of health care with a specific interest in problems relating to the skin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书