From early recognition to precision medicine: advances in the diagnosis and management of adult sepsis and septic shock-a narrative review.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Hazal Koca, Pinar Ayvat
{"title":"From early recognition to precision medicine: advances in the diagnosis and management of adult sepsis and septic shock-a narrative review.","authors":"Hazal Koca, Pinar Ayvat","doi":"10.1007/s15010-026-03019-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Emerging diagnostic, computational, and precision approaches are expanding the ability to detect, classify, and biologically characterise sepsis, but their translation into clinical benefit depends on whether added information changes management and, ultimately, improves patient-centred outcomes. This review evaluates selected advances in adult sepsis and septic shock through a framework of clinical actionability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A focused PubMed search was supplemented by major international guidelines, targeted searches, and reference-list screening through August 2026. Priority was given to randomised trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, multicentre studies, and prospective or external validation studies relevant to clinical implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We developed a two-gap framework to distinguish gains in information from clinically meaningful translation. The information-to-action gap describes situations in which improved detection, prediction, biological classification, or physiological assessment does not alter management; the decision-to-outcome gap describes management changes without demonstrated patient-centred benefit. Digital alerts, rapid diagnostics, host-response assays, physiology-guided resuscitation, and phenotype- or biomarker-guided strategies show differing degrees of actionability. Across these domains, reproducibility, transportability, workflow integration, timing, temporal stability, and treatment-predictive validity remain key constraints.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most of the emerging diagnostic, computational, and precision approaches reviewed here have not yet established a routine role in sepsis care. Established evidence-based management therefore remains the clinical foundation, while newer strategies should be evaluated prospectively for their ability to close the information-to-action and decision-to-outcome gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-026-03019-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Emerging diagnostic, computational, and precision approaches are expanding the ability to detect, classify, and biologically characterise sepsis, but their translation into clinical benefit depends on whether added information changes management and, ultimately, improves patient-centred outcomes. This review evaluates selected advances in adult sepsis and septic shock through a framework of clinical actionability.

Methods: A focused PubMed search was supplemented by major international guidelines, targeted searches, and reference-list screening through August 2026. Priority was given to randomised trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, multicentre studies, and prospective or external validation studies relevant to clinical implementation.

Results: We developed a two-gap framework to distinguish gains in information from clinically meaningful translation. The information-to-action gap describes situations in which improved detection, prediction, biological classification, or physiological assessment does not alter management; the decision-to-outcome gap describes management changes without demonstrated patient-centred benefit. Digital alerts, rapid diagnostics, host-response assays, physiology-guided resuscitation, and phenotype- or biomarker-guided strategies show differing degrees of actionability. Across these domains, reproducibility, transportability, workflow integration, timing, temporal stability, and treatment-predictive validity remain key constraints.

Conclusion: Most of the emerging diagnostic, computational, and precision approaches reviewed here have not yet established a routine role in sepsis care. Established evidence-based management therefore remains the clinical foundation, while newer strategies should be evaluated prospectively for their ability to close the information-to-action and decision-to-outcome gaps.

从早期识别到精准医学:成人脓毒症和脓毒性休克的诊断和治疗进展
目的:新兴的诊断、计算和精确方法正在扩大脓毒症的检测、分类和生物学特征的能力,但它们转化为临床效益取决于增加的信息是否改变了管理,并最终改善了以患者为中心的结果。本综述通过临床可操作性的框架评估成人败血症和感染性休克的选定进展。方法:到2026年8月,通过主要国际指南、目标搜索和参考文献列表筛选,对PubMed检索进行重点补充。优先考虑随机试验、系统评价和荟萃分析、多中心研究以及与临床实施相关的前瞻性或外部验证研究。结果:我们开发了一个双间隙框架来区分临床意义翻译的信息收益。信息到行动的差距描述的是改进的检测、预测、生物分类或生理评估不能改变管理的情况;决策到结果的差距描述了没有证明以患者为中心的益处的管理变化。数字警报、快速诊断、宿主反应分析、生理引导复苏以及表型或生物标志物引导策略显示出不同程度的可操作性。在这些领域中,再现性、可移植性、工作流集成、时间、时间稳定性和治疗预测有效性仍然是关键的制约因素。结论:本文回顾的大多数新兴诊断、计算和精确方法尚未在败血症护理中建立常规作用。因此,已建立的循证管理仍然是临床基础,而更新的战略应前瞻性地评估其弥合信息到行动和决策到结果差距的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infection
Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
1.30%
发文量
224
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection is a journal dedicated to serving as a global forum for the presentation and discussion of clinically relevant information on infectious diseases. Its primary goal is to engage readers and contributors from various regions around the world in the exchange of knowledge about the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, both in outpatient and inpatient settings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including: Etiology: The study of the causes of infectious diseases. Pathogenesis: The process by which an infectious agent causes disease. Diagnosis: The methods and techniques used to identify infectious diseases. Treatment: The medical interventions and strategies employed to treat infectious diseases. Public Health: Issues of local, regional, or international significance related to infectious diseases, including prevention, control, and management strategies. Hospital Epidemiology: The study of the spread of infectious diseases within healthcare settings and the measures to prevent nosocomial infections. In addition to these, Infection also includes a specialized "Images" section, which focuses on high-quality visual content, such as images, photographs, and microscopic slides, accompanied by brief abstracts. This section is designed to highlight the clinical and diagnostic value of visual aids in the field of infectious diseases, as many conditions present with characteristic clinical signs that can be diagnosed through inspection, and imaging and microscopy are crucial for accurate diagnosis. The journal's comprehensive approach ensures that it remains a valuable resource for healthcare professionals and researchers in the field of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书