Evolution of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques in forefoot deformity corrections.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Chin Yik Tan, Gowreeson Thevendran
{"title":"Evolution of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques in forefoot deformity corrections.","authors":"Chin Yik Tan, Gowreeson Thevendran","doi":"10.1007/s00264-026-07060-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To review the historical evolution and technical progression of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in forefoot deformity corrections, tracing its development from early medical concepts and general surgery milestones to modern, highly specialized foot and ankle interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An extensive electronic search of the medical and historical literature was performed and complemented by manual review of scientific sources. Historical reports describing the origins of minimally invasive techniques, the evolution of surgical instrumentation, and advancing treatment strategies for forefoot deformities were critically analysed within their scientific and chronological contexts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The history of forefoot MIS represents a continuous process of conceptual evolution. The procedure's trajectory mirrors the disruptive history of laparoscopic surgery, transitioning from early enthusiasm and high complication rates in the United States to a European-led renaissance grounded in strict anatomical landmarks and technological advancements, such as the Shannon burr and image intensifiers. For hallux valgus, the procedure has progressed through four distinct generations distinguished by specific osteotomy and fixation strategies, moving toward true three-dimensional deformity correction. In the treatment of hallux rigidus, MIS provides effective joint-preserving options through percutaneous cheilectomies and decompressive osteotomies, as well as joint-sacrificing arthrodesis. For lesser toe deformities, treatment paradigms have shifted toward more standardised classification, and utilizing hardware-free metatarsal and phalangeal osteotomies that rely on strict postoperative weight-bearing to achieve optimal anatomical alignment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The historical maturation of forefoot MIS illustrates a continuous refinement of surgical \"processes\" and hardware \"ingredients\" aimed at optimizing clinical outcomes. Understanding this evolutionary framework provides a crucial foundation for future innovations, including the integration of bioabsorbable implants, 3D-printed instrumentation, and artificial intelligence in foot and ankle surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":14450,"journal":{"name":"International Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-026-07060-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To review the historical evolution and technical progression of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in forefoot deformity corrections, tracing its development from early medical concepts and general surgery milestones to modern, highly specialized foot and ankle interventions.

Methods: An extensive electronic search of the medical and historical literature was performed and complemented by manual review of scientific sources. Historical reports describing the origins of minimally invasive techniques, the evolution of surgical instrumentation, and advancing treatment strategies for forefoot deformities were critically analysed within their scientific and chronological contexts.

Results: The history of forefoot MIS represents a continuous process of conceptual evolution. The procedure's trajectory mirrors the disruptive history of laparoscopic surgery, transitioning from early enthusiasm and high complication rates in the United States to a European-led renaissance grounded in strict anatomical landmarks and technological advancements, such as the Shannon burr and image intensifiers. For hallux valgus, the procedure has progressed through four distinct generations distinguished by specific osteotomy and fixation strategies, moving toward true three-dimensional deformity correction. In the treatment of hallux rigidus, MIS provides effective joint-preserving options through percutaneous cheilectomies and decompressive osteotomies, as well as joint-sacrificing arthrodesis. For lesser toe deformities, treatment paradigms have shifted toward more standardised classification, and utilizing hardware-free metatarsal and phalangeal osteotomies that rely on strict postoperative weight-bearing to achieve optimal anatomical alignment.

Conclusions: The historical maturation of forefoot MIS illustrates a continuous refinement of surgical "processes" and hardware "ingredients" aimed at optimizing clinical outcomes. Understanding this evolutionary framework provides a crucial foundation for future innovations, including the integration of bioabsorbable implants, 3D-printed instrumentation, and artificial intelligence in foot and ankle surgery.

微创手术(MIS)矫正前足畸形技术的发展。
目的:回顾微创手术(MIS)在前足畸形矫正中的历史演变和技术进步,追溯其从早期医学概念和普通外科里程碑到现代高度专业化的足部和踝关节干预的发展。方法:对医学和历史文献进行广泛的电子检索,并辅以人工审查科学来源。历史报道描述了微创技术的起源,手术器械的发展,以及前足畸形的先进治疗策略,在其科学和时间背景下进行了批判性分析。结果:前足MIS的历史是一个连续的概念演变过程。该手术的发展轨迹反映了腹腔镜手术的颠覆性历史,从美国早期的热情和高并发症到欧洲领导的基于严格解剖标志和技术进步的复兴,如香农伯尔和图像增强器。对于拇外翻,手术经过了四代不同的发展,以特定的截骨和固定策略为特征,向真正的三维畸形矫正迈进。在拇僵直的治疗中,MIS通过经皮截骨术和减压截骨术以及牺牲关节的关节融合术提供了有效的关节保护选择。对于小脚趾畸形,治疗模式已经转向更标准化的分类,并采用无硬件的跖骨和指骨截骨术,依赖于严格的术后负重来实现最佳的解剖对齐。结论:前足MIS的历史成熟说明了旨在优化临床结果的手术“过程”和硬件“成分”的不断改进。了解这一进化框架为未来的创新提供了至关重要的基础,包括在足部和踝关节手术中整合生物吸收植入物、3d打印仪器和人工智能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Orthopaedics
International Orthopaedics 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
360
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: International Orthopaedics, the Official Journal of the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) , publishes original papers from all over the world. The articles deal with clinical orthopaedic surgery or basic research directly connected with orthopaedic surgery. International Orthopaedics will also link all the members of SICOT by means of an insert that will be concerned with SICOT matters. Finally, it is expected that news and information regarding all aspects of orthopaedic surgery, including meetings, panels, instructional courses, etc. will be brought to the attention of the readers. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the "Principles of laboratory animal care" (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1985) were followed, as well as specific national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals) where applicable. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfil the above-mentioned requirements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书