A novel life cycle assessment of lithium-thionyl chloride batteries in smart gas meters: Carbon, toxicity, and energy footprint.

IF 3.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Samira Sharifi Zemeidani, Fatemeh Razi Astaraei, Roghayeh Ghasempour, Hajar Abyar
{"title":"A novel life cycle assessment of lithium-thionyl chloride batteries in smart gas meters: Carbon, toxicity, and energy footprint.","authors":"Samira Sharifi Zemeidani, Fatemeh Razi Astaraei, Roghayeh Ghasempour, Hajar Abyar","doi":"10.1093/inteam/vjag111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rapid deployment of smart gas meters has increased reliance on lithium-thionyl chloride (LTC) batteries, serving as the dominant power source due to their long service life and operational reliability. Despite their widespread use, their life cycle environmental burdens have received less attention. This study addresses this research gap by providing the life cycle assessment (LCA) of LTC batteries used in smart gas meters, based on 500,000 D-size cells over a 30-year service life. The results demonstrated a total carbon footprint of 1,434,654 kg CO2-eq (28.7 kg CO2-eq kg-1 battery) using the ReCiPe method, with electricity consumption and heavy fuel oil contributing 48.56% and 22.68% of total global warming potential (GWP), respectively. The midpoint impacts identified marine ecotoxicity (45.3%) and freshwater ecotoxicity (25.8%) as dominant impact categories, mostly driven by nickel (up to 59% contribution). Endpoint results illustrated damages of 5.37 disability-adjusted life years (DALY) to human health, 0.00876 species·yr to ecosystems, and 178,326 USD in resource scarcity. The energy demand of LTC battery manufacturing was strongly fossil-based, with 92.6% supplied from non-renewable energy sources. Scenario analysis highlighted that switching to wind or solar energy can decrease GWP by ∼ 46%, while considering the transportation of 10 t.km, enhanced GWP by 31.3% and endpoint damages by > 29.6%. Monte Carlo analysis based on 10,000 runs confirmed data robustness with a coefficient of variation of less than 15% for most impact categories. The findings provide a transparent and application-specific LCA framework for LTC batteries and highlight key intervention points to decrease environmental burdens associated with large-scale smart gas meter deployment.</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjag111","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid deployment of smart gas meters has increased reliance on lithium-thionyl chloride (LTC) batteries, serving as the dominant power source due to their long service life and operational reliability. Despite their widespread use, their life cycle environmental burdens have received less attention. This study addresses this research gap by providing the life cycle assessment (LCA) of LTC batteries used in smart gas meters, based on 500,000 D-size cells over a 30-year service life. The results demonstrated a total carbon footprint of 1,434,654 kg CO2-eq (28.7 kg CO2-eq kg-1 battery) using the ReCiPe method, with electricity consumption and heavy fuel oil contributing 48.56% and 22.68% of total global warming potential (GWP), respectively. The midpoint impacts identified marine ecotoxicity (45.3%) and freshwater ecotoxicity (25.8%) as dominant impact categories, mostly driven by nickel (up to 59% contribution). Endpoint results illustrated damages of 5.37 disability-adjusted life years (DALY) to human health, 0.00876 species·yr to ecosystems, and 178,326 USD in resource scarcity. The energy demand of LTC battery manufacturing was strongly fossil-based, with 92.6% supplied from non-renewable energy sources. Scenario analysis highlighted that switching to wind or solar energy can decrease GWP by ∼ 46%, while considering the transportation of 10 t.km, enhanced GWP by 31.3% and endpoint damages by > 29.6%. Monte Carlo analysis based on 10,000 runs confirmed data robustness with a coefficient of variation of less than 15% for most impact categories. The findings provide a transparent and application-specific LCA framework for LTC batteries and highlight key intervention points to decrease environmental burdens associated with large-scale smart gas meter deployment.

智能煤气表中新型亚硫酰氯锂电池的生命周期评估:碳、毒性和能源足迹。
智能燃气表的快速部署增加了对锂-亚硫酰氯(LTC)电池的依赖,由于其使用寿命长和运行可靠性,LTC电池成为主导电源。尽管它们被广泛使用,但它们的生命周期环境负担却很少受到关注。这项研究通过提供智能煤气表中使用的LTC电池的生命周期评估(LCA)来解决这一研究空白,该研究基于50万个d尺寸电池,使用寿命超过30年。结果表明,使用ReCiPe方法,总碳足迹为1,434,654 kg CO2-eq (28.7 kg CO2-eq kg- kg-1电池),其中电力消耗和重质燃料油分别占全球变暖潜势(GWP)的48.56%和22.68%。中点影响确定海洋生态毒性(45.3%)和淡水生态毒性(25.8%)为主要影响类别,主要由镍驱动(贡献高达59%)。终点结果显示,人类健康损失5.37个残疾调整生命年(DALY),生态系统损失0.00876个物种·年,资源稀缺损失178,326美元。LTC电池制造的能源需求主要来自化石燃料,其中92.6%来自不可再生能源。情景分析强调,转换为风能或太阳能可以降低~ 46%的全球变暖潜能值,而考虑到10吨公里的运输,全球变暖潜能值提高了31.3%,端点损害减少了29.6%。基于10,000次运行的蒙特卡罗分析证实了大多数影响类别的数据鲁棒性,变异系数小于15%。研究结果为LTC电池提供了一个透明的、特定应用的LCA框架,并强调了关键干预点,以减少与大规模智能燃气表部署相关的环境负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCESTOXICOLOGY&nbs-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM) publishes the science underpinning environmental decision making and problem solving. Papers submitted to IEAM must link science and technical innovations to vexing regional or global environmental issues in one or more of the following core areas: Science-informed regulation, policy, and decision making Health and ecological risk and impact assessment Restoration and management of damaged ecosystems Sustaining ecosystems Managing large-scale environmental change Papers published in these broad fields of study are connected by an array of interdisciplinary engineering, management, and scientific themes, which collectively reflect the interconnectedness of the scientific, social, and environmental challenges facing our modern global society: Methods for environmental quality assessment; forecasting across a number of ecosystem uses and challenges (systems-based, cost-benefit, ecosystem services, etc.); measuring or predicting ecosystem change and adaptation Approaches that connect policy and management tools; harmonize national and international environmental regulation; merge human well-being with ecological management; develop and sustain the function of ecosystems; conceptualize, model and apply concepts of spatial and regional sustainability Assessment and management frameworks that incorporate conservation, life cycle, restoration, and sustainability; considerations for climate-induced adaptation, change and consequences, and vulnerability Environmental management applications using risk-based approaches; considerations for protecting and fostering biodiversity, as well as enhancement or protection of ecosystem services and resiliency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书