Shelter dogs harbor diverse tick species and demonstrate high exposure to tick-borne pathogens in a zone of tick range expansion.

IF 2.3 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Colleen E Shockling Dent, Jed Henning, Ningzhu Bai, Troy Koser, Syd Wilson, Yiming Chu, Risa Pesapane
{"title":"Shelter dogs harbor diverse tick species and demonstrate high exposure to tick-borne pathogens in a zone of tick range expansion.","authors":"Colleen E Shockling Dent, Jed Henning, Ningzhu Bai, Troy Koser, Syd Wilson, Yiming Chu, Risa Pesapane","doi":"10.2460/javma.26.06.0477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize ticks and tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) among Ohio shelter dogs and identify factors associated with canine exposure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included dogs admitted to an Ohio shelter partner between January 2020 and January 2021. Paired tick and blood samples were collected at intake. Ticks were identified and tested for TBPs by PCR; dogs underwent serologic testing and PCR. Logistic regression assessed associations between demographic and clinical variables and seropositivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 273 dogs were enrolled. Four tick species, including Haemaphysalis longicornis, were found on 22% of dogs. Overall, 43.9% were seropositive for ≥ 1 TBP and 24% for multiple TBPs. Seroprevalence was highest for Borrelia burgdorferi (33.5%) followed by Ehrlichia spp (24.4%) and Rickettsia spp (19.8%). Few dogs were PCR positive, and clinical signs were uncommon (3.7%). Tick PCR detected several relevant pathogens. Tick presence and host factors were associated with increased odds of seropositivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ohio shelter dogs demonstrate high exposure to diverse TBPs despite few PCR-positive results and infrequent clinical signs. Paired testing of dogs and attached ticks provides integrated information relevant to veterinary and public health surveillance in a region experiencing increasing tick abundance and pathogen prevalence.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Tick presence at intake may help prioritize testing when universal screening is infeasible. Rickettsia seropositivity should be interpreted cautiously because serologic cross-reactivity complicates clinical interpretation and species-level attribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":14658,"journal":{"name":"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.26.06.0477","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To characterize ticks and tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) among Ohio shelter dogs and identify factors associated with canine exposure.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included dogs admitted to an Ohio shelter partner between January 2020 and January 2021. Paired tick and blood samples were collected at intake. Ticks were identified and tested for TBPs by PCR; dogs underwent serologic testing and PCR. Logistic regression assessed associations between demographic and clinical variables and seropositivity.

Results: A total of 273 dogs were enrolled. Four tick species, including Haemaphysalis longicornis, were found on 22% of dogs. Overall, 43.9% were seropositive for ≥ 1 TBP and 24% for multiple TBPs. Seroprevalence was highest for Borrelia burgdorferi (33.5%) followed by Ehrlichia spp (24.4%) and Rickettsia spp (19.8%). Few dogs were PCR positive, and clinical signs were uncommon (3.7%). Tick PCR detected several relevant pathogens. Tick presence and host factors were associated with increased odds of seropositivity.

Conclusions: Ohio shelter dogs demonstrate high exposure to diverse TBPs despite few PCR-positive results and infrequent clinical signs. Paired testing of dogs and attached ticks provides integrated information relevant to veterinary and public health surveillance in a region experiencing increasing tick abundance and pathogen prevalence.

Clinical relevance: Tick presence at intake may help prioritize testing when universal screening is infeasible. Rickettsia seropositivity should be interpreted cautiously because serologic cross-reactivity complicates clinical interpretation and species-level attribution.

收容所里的狗拥有多种蜱虫物种,并在蜱虫范围扩大的地区表现出高度暴露于蜱虫传播的病原体。
目的:了解俄亥俄州收容所犬中蜱虫和蜱传病原体(tbp)的特征,并确定与犬接触相关的因素。方法:本横断面研究包括2020年1月至2021年1月期间入住俄亥俄州收容所的狗。在进食时采集成对蜱虫和血液样本。采用PCR方法对蜱虫进行鉴定和TBPs检测;进行血清学检测和PCR。Logistic回归评估了人口学和临床变量与血清阳性之间的关系。结果:共纳入273只犬。在22%的狗身上发现了四种蜱虫,包括长角血蜱。总体而言,43.9%的患者血清≥1 TBP呈阳性,24%的患者为多例TBP呈阳性。伯氏疏螺旋体的血清阳性率最高(33.5%),其次是埃利希氏体(24.4%)和立克次体(19.8%)。PCR阳性犬少,临床症状少见(3.7%)。蜱虫PCR检测到几种相关病原体。蜱的存在和宿主因素与血清阳性几率增加有关。结论:尽管很少有pcr阳性结果和罕见的临床症状,但俄亥俄州收容所的狗表现出对各种tbp的高暴露。犬和蜱虫的配对检测为蜱虫数量和病原体流行度不断增加的地区的兽医和公共卫生监测提供了相关的综合信息。临床相关性:当无法进行全面筛查时,摄入蜱虫可能有助于优先进行检测。立克次体血清学阳性应谨慎解释,因为血清学交叉反应使临床解释和物种水平归因复杂化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
15.80%
发文量
539
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Published twice monthly, this peer-reviewed, general scientific journal provides reports of clinical research, feature articles and regular columns of interest to veterinarians in private and public practice. The News and Classified Ad sections are posted online 10 days to two weeks before they are delivered in print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书