Exploring the Relationship Between Femoral Neck Torsion Angle and Anteversion Angle Through Three-Dimensional Reconstruction in a Fixed Coordinate System.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
International Journal of General Medicine Pub Date : 2026-10-09 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S633691
Guangliang Jiang, Xiaoyun Xue, Yingsheng Deng, Ruibao Yang
{"title":"Exploring the Relationship Between Femoral Neck Torsion Angle and Anteversion Angle Through Three-Dimensional Reconstruction in a Fixed Coordinate System.","authors":"Guangliang Jiang, Xiaoyun Xue, Yingsheng Deng, Ruibao Yang","doi":"10.2147/IJGM.S633691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The femoral neck torsion angle (FNTA), an important parameter for assessing femoral neck morphology, has long been underappreciated in clinical practice. This study aimed to explore the relationship between FNTA and femoral neck anteversion angle (FNAA) through a 3D reconstruction in a fixed coordinate system (3D-R-FCS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty synthetic Sawbone femoral specimens were analyzed. A 3D-R-FCS was established using superimposing consecutive axial cross-sections after CT scanning and 3D reconstruction. Two independent evaluators measured FNAA via Reikeras, Murphy methods and 3D-R-FCS, and evaluated FNTA via 3D-R-FCS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FNAA measured by 3D-R-FCS significantly differed from those assessed by Reikeras and Murphy methods (p < 0.001). Intra- and inter-rater intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the 3D-R-FCS exceeded 0.96, markedly higher than those of the Reikeras (ICC = 0.72-0.73) and Murphy methods (ICC = 0.76-0.82). A strong positive correlation was found between the FNTA and the FNAA discrepancy values measured by the two 2D methods (r > 0.95, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 3D-R-FCS provides a highly reproducible model for quantifying femoral neck anatomy. The study finds out a poor correlation between FNTA and FNAA under 3D-R-FCS, and a positive correlation between FNTA measured by 3D-R-FCS and the FNAA discrepancy values measured by the two 2D methods. The correlation analysis suggests that traditional 2D measurement errors primarily might result from the intrinsic 3D spatial configuration of the femoral neck. However, these results need further explorations and validations in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":"19 ","pages":"633691"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13660505/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S633691","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The femoral neck torsion angle (FNTA), an important parameter for assessing femoral neck morphology, has long been underappreciated in clinical practice. This study aimed to explore the relationship between FNTA and femoral neck anteversion angle (FNAA) through a 3D reconstruction in a fixed coordinate system (3D-R-FCS).

Methods: Fifty synthetic Sawbone femoral specimens were analyzed. A 3D-R-FCS was established using superimposing consecutive axial cross-sections after CT scanning and 3D reconstruction. Two independent evaluators measured FNAA via Reikeras, Murphy methods and 3D-R-FCS, and evaluated FNTA via 3D-R-FCS.

Results: The FNAA measured by 3D-R-FCS significantly differed from those assessed by Reikeras and Murphy methods (p < 0.001). Intra- and inter-rater intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the 3D-R-FCS exceeded 0.96, markedly higher than those of the Reikeras (ICC = 0.72-0.73) and Murphy methods (ICC = 0.76-0.82). A strong positive correlation was found between the FNTA and the FNAA discrepancy values measured by the two 2D methods (r > 0.95, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The 3D-R-FCS provides a highly reproducible model for quantifying femoral neck anatomy. The study finds out a poor correlation between FNTA and FNAA under 3D-R-FCS, and a positive correlation between FNTA measured by 3D-R-FCS and the FNAA discrepancy values measured by the two 2D methods. The correlation analysis suggests that traditional 2D measurement errors primarily might result from the intrinsic 3D spatial configuration of the femoral neck. However, these results need further explorations and validations in clinical practice.

通过固定坐标系下的三维重建探讨股骨颈扭转角与前倾角的关系。
背景:股骨颈扭转角(FNTA)是评价股骨颈形态的一个重要参数,但在临床实践中一直被低估。本研究旨在通过固定坐标系三维重建(3D- r - fcs)探讨股骨颈前倾角(FNAA)与股骨颈前倾角(FNTA)的关系。方法:对50例人工合成锯骨股骨标本进行分析。采用CT扫描和三维重建后的连续轴向截面叠加建立3D- r - fcs。两名独立评估人员通过Reikeras、Murphy方法和3D-R-FCS测量FNAA,并通过3D-R-FCS评估FNTA。结果:3D-R-FCS测定的FNAA与Reikeras和Murphy法测定的FNAA差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。3D-R-FCS的分级内、分级间相关系数(ICC)均超过0.96,显著高于Reikeras法(ICC = 0.72-0.73)和Murphy法(ICC = 0.76-0.82)。两种2D方法测量的FNTA与FNAA差异值之间存在很强的正相关(r < 0.95, p < 0.001)。结论:3D-R-FCS为股骨颈解剖定量提供了高度可重复性的模型。研究发现3D-R-FCS下FNTA与FNAA的相关性较差,3D-R-FCS测量的FNTA与两种2D方法测量的FNAA差异值呈正相关。相关分析表明,传统的二维测量误差主要是由股骨颈固有的三维空间结构造成的。然而,这些结果需要在临床实践中进一步探索和验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of General Medicine
International Journal of General Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1113
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas. A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书