An Experience of Orthopedic Implant-Related Adverse Events at a Regional Training Center in Central India.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2026-05-30 eCollection Date: 2026-10-01 DOI:10.1007/s43465-026-01817-y
Ahmad Najmi, Shilpa N Kaore, Rehan-Ul-Haq, Manish Dwivedi, S Balakrishnan, Mohammad Faizan Khan, Chirag Agrawal
{"title":"An Experience of Orthopedic Implant-Related Adverse Events at a Regional Training Center in Central India.","authors":"Ahmad Najmi, Shilpa N Kaore, Rehan-Ul-Haq, Manish Dwivedi, S Balakrishnan, Mohammad Faizan Khan, Chirag Agrawal","doi":"10.1007/s43465-026-01817-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orthopedic implant-associated adverse events (OIAEs) pose a significant challenge to patient safety. Infections, implant failures, allergic reactions, and the need for revision surgeries are among the most frequently reported complications. This study aimed to evaluate the nature and pattern of medical device adverse events (MDAEs) related to orthopedic implants at a Regional Training Center under the Materiovigilance Program of India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, observational study was conducted using spontaneously reported MDAEs at the Medical Device Monitoring Center (MDMC), at a tertiary care center in Central India, between July 2019 and September 2022. Reports were submitted by healthcare professionals, patients, or their caregivers. Data were collected using the Indian Pharmacopeia Commission (IPC) recommended MDAE reporting form and analyzed using Microsoft Excel and SPSS v1.0.0.1406. Causality was assessed using WHO-UMC criteria. Descriptive statistics (frequency, percentages) were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 92 MDAEs were reported, of which 88% were serious. Infections were the leading cause (73%), followed by dislocation (11%), allergic reactions (7%), implant loosening (5%), and metallosis or bent nails (2% each). Revision surgery was required in 76% of cases. The most frequently implicated devices included interlocking nails and tibia locking plates. Causality assessment categorized 58% as probable, 25% as possible, and the remainder as unlikely, unassessable, or not related.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights infections as the predominant OIAE, requiring revision surgeries in most cases. A robust materiovigilance system and increased awareness among healthcare providers are essential for timely detection and reporting of OIAEs to improve patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":"60 10","pages":"2895-2900"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13658667/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-026-01817-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Orthopedic implant-associated adverse events (OIAEs) pose a significant challenge to patient safety. Infections, implant failures, allergic reactions, and the need for revision surgeries are among the most frequently reported complications. This study aimed to evaluate the nature and pattern of medical device adverse events (MDAEs) related to orthopedic implants at a Regional Training Center under the Materiovigilance Program of India.

Methods: A retrospective, observational study was conducted using spontaneously reported MDAEs at the Medical Device Monitoring Center (MDMC), at a tertiary care center in Central India, between July 2019 and September 2022. Reports were submitted by healthcare professionals, patients, or their caregivers. Data were collected using the Indian Pharmacopeia Commission (IPC) recommended MDAE reporting form and analyzed using Microsoft Excel and SPSS v1.0.0.1406. Causality was assessed using WHO-UMC criteria. Descriptive statistics (frequency, percentages) were used for analysis.

Results: A total of 92 MDAEs were reported, of which 88% were serious. Infections were the leading cause (73%), followed by dislocation (11%), allergic reactions (7%), implant loosening (5%), and metallosis or bent nails (2% each). Revision surgery was required in 76% of cases. The most frequently implicated devices included interlocking nails and tibia locking plates. Causality assessment categorized 58% as probable, 25% as possible, and the remainder as unlikely, unassessable, or not related.

Conclusion: This study highlights infections as the predominant OIAE, requiring revision surgeries in most cases. A robust materiovigilance system and increased awareness among healthcare providers are essential for timely detection and reporting of OIAEs to improve patient safety.

印度中部地区培训中心骨科植入物相关不良事件的经验。
背景:骨科植入物相关不良事件(oiae)对患者安全构成了重大挑战。感染、植入失败、过敏反应和需要翻修手术是最常见的并发症。本研究旨在评估印度某区域培训中心与骨科植入物相关的医疗器械不良事件(MDAEs)的性质和模式。方法:在2019年7月至2022年9月期间,在印度中部一家三级医疗中心的医疗器械监测中心(MDMC)使用自发报告的MDAEs进行了一项回顾性观察性研究。报告由医疗保健专业人员、患者或其护理人员提交。采用印度药典委员会(IPC)推荐的MDAE报告表收集数据,使用Microsoft Excel和SPSS v1.0.0.1406进行分析。使用WHO-UMC标准评估因果关系。使用描述性统计(频率、百分比)进行分析。结果:共报告MDAEs 92例,其中重度占88%。感染是主要原因(73%),其次是脱位(11%)、过敏反应(7%)、种植体松动(5%)和金属病或弯曲指甲(各占2%)。76%的病例需要进行翻修手术。最常见的器械包括互锁钉和胫骨锁定钢板。因果关系评估将58%归为可能,25%归为可能,其余归为不可能、不可评估或不相关。结论:本研究强调感染是主要的OIAE,大多数病例需要翻修手术。健全的物质警戒系统和提高医疗保健提供者的意识对于及时发现和报告oiae以改善患者安全至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书