Comparative Assessment of Observed Dentinal Defects Following Root Canal Preparation With TruNatomy, ProTaper Next, and Dia-X Nickel-Titanium Rotary Systems: An In Vitro Study.
{"title":"Comparative Assessment of Observed Dentinal Defects Following Root Canal Preparation With TruNatomy, ProTaper Next, and Dia-X Nickel-Titanium Rotary Systems: An In Vitro Study.","authors":"Shakhawan Kadir Kadir, Khanda Ali Kareem","doi":"10.1155/ijod/2003578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endodontic treatment relies on effective root canal preparation using nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary instruments; however, dentinal defects may be observed following mechanical canal preparation. A total of 40 extracted human mandibular premolars with single roots and single straight canals were randomly allocated into four groups (<i>n</i> = 10), control (unprepared), TruNatomy (TRN), ProTaper Next (PTN), and Dia-X. Root canal was prepared using an ENDO-MATE DT endodontic motor (NSK, Japan), and horizontally sectioned from the apex using a low-speed diamond disc, corresponding to apical, middle, and coronal root thirds, respectively. Dentinal microcracks were evaluated under a stereomicroscope at ×20 magnification. Dentinal defects were observed in all instrumented groups, while the unprepared control group showed the lowest incidence, with defects detected at the apical and coronal thirds (10% each). No statistically significant differences were found among the three rotary systems at the apical (<i>p</i> = 0.211), middle (<i>p</i> = 0.069), or coronal (<i>p</i> = 0.600) levels. However, overall comparison showed a statistically significant difference among groups (<i>p</i> = 0.043), with significant differences between the control group and TRN (<i>p</i> = 0.045), PTN (<i>p</i> = 0.045), and Dia-X (<i>p</i> = 0.010). Dentinal defects were detected at different root levels following preparation with all three rotary systems, with higher overall defect incidence than in the unprepared control group; however, the present methodology does not allow definitive attribution of these defects to instrumentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Dentistry","volume":"2026 ","pages":"2003578"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13659641/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijod/2003578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Endodontic treatment relies on effective root canal preparation using nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary instruments; however, dentinal defects may be observed following mechanical canal preparation. A total of 40 extracted human mandibular premolars with single roots and single straight canals were randomly allocated into four groups (n = 10), control (unprepared), TruNatomy (TRN), ProTaper Next (PTN), and Dia-X. Root canal was prepared using an ENDO-MATE DT endodontic motor (NSK, Japan), and horizontally sectioned from the apex using a low-speed diamond disc, corresponding to apical, middle, and coronal root thirds, respectively. Dentinal microcracks were evaluated under a stereomicroscope at ×20 magnification. Dentinal defects were observed in all instrumented groups, while the unprepared control group showed the lowest incidence, with defects detected at the apical and coronal thirds (10% each). No statistically significant differences were found among the three rotary systems at the apical (p = 0.211), middle (p = 0.069), or coronal (p = 0.600) levels. However, overall comparison showed a statistically significant difference among groups (p = 0.043), with significant differences between the control group and TRN (p = 0.045), PTN (p = 0.045), and Dia-X (p = 0.010). Dentinal defects were detected at different root levels following preparation with all three rotary systems, with higher overall defect incidence than in the unprepared control group; however, the present methodology does not allow definitive attribution of these defects to instrumentation.