Association between environmental heat stress and 30:15 intermittent fitness test performance in youth football players: a two-season observational study.
Vincenzo Rago, Edgar Schwarz, Júlio A Costa, George P Nassis, Pedro Figueiredo
{"title":"Association between environmental heat stress and 30:15 intermittent fitness test performance in youth football players: a two-season observational study.","authors":"Vincenzo Rago, Edgar Schwarz, Júlio A Costa, George P Nassis, Pedro Figueiredo","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2026.1896010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intermittent field tests in football are commonly conducted outdoors, exposing players to environmental heat stress. This study examined the influence of environmental heat stress on the 30:15 Intermittent Fitness Test (V<sub>IFT</sub>) performance in highly trained young football players. A total of 642 V<sub>IFT</sub> assessments were collected from 312 male players (U14-U19) across two seasons. Environmental conditions were obtained from an open-source service. Heat stress was quantified via the wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT) and categorized into unrestricted (<22 °C), low-risk (22 °C-28 °C) and high-risk (>28 °C) conditions. Linear mixed models were used to analyze the associations between anthropometric, neuromuscular, and environmental factors on V<sub>IFT</sub> performance. V<sub>IFT</sub> decreased by ∼0.4 km/h in low-risk and ∼1.5 km/h in high-risk heat conditions (<i>d</i> = 0.12-0.45; <i>P</i> < 0.01) compared to unrestricted. These differences persisted after adjusting for anthropometric characteristics and CMJ performance, except in U19 players, where the V<sub>IFT</sub> decrement in low-risk conditions disappeared (<i>P</i> = 0.183). The V<sub>IFT</sub> declined by 0.09-0.15 km/h for every 1 °C increase in WBGT (<i>r</i> = -0.74 to -0.28; <i>P</i> < 0.05). Our findings suggest the V<sub>IFT</sub> performance might decrease by one running stage (0.5 km/h) for every ∼5 °C increase in WBGT. Practitioners should account for environmental conditions when profiling players and prescribing training based on the V<sub>IFT</sub>.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":"8 ","pages":"1896010"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13658194/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2026.1896010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Intermittent field tests in football are commonly conducted outdoors, exposing players to environmental heat stress. This study examined the influence of environmental heat stress on the 30:15 Intermittent Fitness Test (VIFT) performance in highly trained young football players. A total of 642 VIFT assessments were collected from 312 male players (U14-U19) across two seasons. Environmental conditions were obtained from an open-source service. Heat stress was quantified via the wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT) and categorized into unrestricted (<22 °C), low-risk (22 °C-28 °C) and high-risk (>28 °C) conditions. Linear mixed models were used to analyze the associations between anthropometric, neuromuscular, and environmental factors on VIFT performance. VIFT decreased by ∼0.4 km/h in low-risk and ∼1.5 km/h in high-risk heat conditions (d = 0.12-0.45; P < 0.01) compared to unrestricted. These differences persisted after adjusting for anthropometric characteristics and CMJ performance, except in U19 players, where the VIFT decrement in low-risk conditions disappeared (P = 0.183). The VIFT declined by 0.09-0.15 km/h for every 1 °C increase in WBGT (r = -0.74 to -0.28; P < 0.05). Our findings suggest the VIFT performance might decrease by one running stage (0.5 km/h) for every ∼5 °C increase in WBGT. Practitioners should account for environmental conditions when profiling players and prescribing training based on the VIFT.