Feasibility of a remote-care-system-based sibling peer event for young carers: a longitudinal pilot study.

IF 3.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Frontiers in Psychology Pub Date : 2026-09-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1940533
Rie Wakimizu, Keita Sasaki, Mariko Hoshi, Rika Ogoshi, Marise Kasai, Yoshiyuki Kawano
{"title":"Feasibility of a remote-care-system-based sibling peer event for young carers: a longitudinal pilot study.","authors":"Rie Wakimizu, Keita Sasaki, Mariko Hoshi, Rika Ogoshi, Marise Kasai, Yoshiyuki Kawano","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1940533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Siblings of children with chronic conditions or disabilities (young carers) often take on caregiving roles yet remain largely outside family-support frameworks, and intervention research targeting them is scarce, particularly in Japan. This prospective longitudinal pilot study examined the feasibility of delivering an in-person sibling peer event (a one-day group gathering combining recreational activities, peer interaction, activities facilitating emotional expression, and crafts) embedded within a continuously operating online remote care system (RCS) and explored preliminary outcome patterns, rather than testing efficacy. Twenty children participated; because one sibling pair shared a single proxy report, they yielded 19 analysis cases (hereafter, 19 cases), assessed before the event (T0), immediately after (T1), and 3 (T2) and 6 (T3) months later, within a feasibility framework and using the Family Empowerment Scale, the EQ-5D (utility and the 0-100 visual analog scale [VAS]), the short Japanese Zarit Burden Interview (J-ZBI_8), and a social resource utilization item. Recruitment was open with no eligibility restrictions; 20 of 22 applicants attended (participation 91%), and no adverse events were reported at any assessment; acceptability was high, with all children rating the event enjoyable and 94.7% wishing to attend again. Questionnaire data were available for 16, 18, 10, and 12 of 19 cases at T0-T3, illustrating the difficulty of longitudinal follow-up. Outcomes were respondent-level: parents provided proxy reports (10 cases) and siblings self-reports (9 cases), so scores index different constructs and are summarized accordingly rather than as a single pooled measure. Changes in quality of life were small, non-significant, and concentrated among parent-proxy reports; because two non-comparable EQ-5D forms were used, utilities are reported descriptively only. As an exploratory signal warranting monitoring rather than a safety concern, self- and proxy-reported burden scores rose immediately after the event and returned toward baseline by 6 months. This pilot provides preliminary feasibility signals for embedding an in-person sibling event within continuous online support and indicates the need for controlled studies to examine the efficacy of such in-person events for siblings, while highlighting measurement and retention challenges to address in future trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"17 ","pages":"1940533"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13661563/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1940533","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Siblings of children with chronic conditions or disabilities (young carers) often take on caregiving roles yet remain largely outside family-support frameworks, and intervention research targeting them is scarce, particularly in Japan. This prospective longitudinal pilot study examined the feasibility of delivering an in-person sibling peer event (a one-day group gathering combining recreational activities, peer interaction, activities facilitating emotional expression, and crafts) embedded within a continuously operating online remote care system (RCS) and explored preliminary outcome patterns, rather than testing efficacy. Twenty children participated; because one sibling pair shared a single proxy report, they yielded 19 analysis cases (hereafter, 19 cases), assessed before the event (T0), immediately after (T1), and 3 (T2) and 6 (T3) months later, within a feasibility framework and using the Family Empowerment Scale, the EQ-5D (utility and the 0-100 visual analog scale [VAS]), the short Japanese Zarit Burden Interview (J-ZBI_8), and a social resource utilization item. Recruitment was open with no eligibility restrictions; 20 of 22 applicants attended (participation 91%), and no adverse events were reported at any assessment; acceptability was high, with all children rating the event enjoyable and 94.7% wishing to attend again. Questionnaire data were available for 16, 18, 10, and 12 of 19 cases at T0-T3, illustrating the difficulty of longitudinal follow-up. Outcomes were respondent-level: parents provided proxy reports (10 cases) and siblings self-reports (9 cases), so scores index different constructs and are summarized accordingly rather than as a single pooled measure. Changes in quality of life were small, non-significant, and concentrated among parent-proxy reports; because two non-comparable EQ-5D forms were used, utilities are reported descriptively only. As an exploratory signal warranting monitoring rather than a safety concern, self- and proxy-reported burden scores rose immediately after the event and returned toward baseline by 6 months. This pilot provides preliminary feasibility signals for embedding an in-person sibling event within continuous online support and indicates the need for controlled studies to examine the efficacy of such in-person events for siblings, while highlighting measurement and retention challenges to address in future trials.

基于远程照护系统的年轻照护者兄弟姐妹同伴活动的可行性:一项纵向试点研究。
患有慢性疾病或残疾的儿童的兄弟姐妹(年轻的照顾者)往往承担照顾的角色,但在很大程度上仍处于家庭支持框架之外,针对他们的干预研究很少,特别是在日本。本前瞻性纵向试点研究考察了在持续运行的在线远程护理系统(RCS)中提供面对面的兄弟姐妹同伴活动(为期一天的团体聚会,包括娱乐活动、同伴互动、促进情感表达的活动和手工艺)的可行性,并探索了初步的结果模式,而不是测试效果。20名儿童参加;由于一对兄弟姐妹共享一份代理报告,他们在可行性框架内,使用家庭赋权量表、EQ-5D(效用和0-100视觉模拟量表[VAS])、日本Zarit负担短访谈(J-ZBI_8)和社会资源利用项目,对事件发生前(T0)、事件发生后(T1)、事件发生后3 (T2)和6 (T3)个月的19例分析病例(以下简称19例)进行评估。招聘是公开的,没有资格限制;22名申请人中有20人参加了(参与率91%),在任何评估中均未报告不良事件;接受度很高,所有的孩子都认为这次活动很有趣,94.7%的孩子希望再次参加。19例T0-T3患者中有16例、18例、10例和12例可获得问卷资料,说明纵向随访的困难。结果是受访者水平的:父母提供代理报告(10例)和兄弟姐妹自我报告(9例),因此得分反映不同的结构并相应汇总,而不是作为单一的汇总测量。生活质量的变化很小,不显著,并且集中在父母代理报告中;由于使用了两种不可比较的EQ-5D表格,因此仅描述性地报告了效用。作为一种需要监测的探索性信号,而不是安全问题,自我和代理报告的负担评分在事件发生后立即上升,并在6个 月后恢复到基线。该试点为在持续在线支持中嵌入面对面的兄弟姐妹事件提供了初步的可行性信号,并表明需要进行对照研究来检查此类面对面事件对兄弟姐妹的有效性,同时强调了在未来试验中需要解决的测量和保留挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
7396
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书