Loneliness and problematic use of conversational artificial intelligence among college students: the serial mediating roles of social anxiety and self-control.

IF 3.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Frontiers in Psychology Pub Date : 2026-09-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1950646
Bingzhi Li, Lu Shi, Xiaofei Bu, Hanwei Zhou
{"title":"Loneliness and problematic use of conversational artificial intelligence among college students: the serial mediating roles of social anxiety and self-control.","authors":"Bingzhi Li, Lu Shi, Xiaofei Bu, Hanwei Zhou","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1950646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Loneliness is an important public health concern associated with individuals' physical and mental wellbeing. As conversational artificial intelligence (CAI) becomes more widely used, concerns about its problematic use have attracted increasing attention. However, the link between loneliness and problematic use of conversational artificial intelligence (PUCAI) remains insufficiently understood. The current research explored the link between loneliness and PUCAI among college students, with social anxiety and self-control evaluated as serial mediators. These findings provide preliminary empirical insight into the psychological correlates of PUCAI and may inform future research and educational efforts aimed at promoting healthy and responsible CAI use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using convenience sampling, this cross-sectional study analyzed data from 400 undergraduate students enrolled at a university in western China. Research instruments included the Loneliness Scale, the PUCAI Scale, the Social Anxiety Scale, and the Self-Control Scale. Descriptive statistics and Pearson correlations were computed with IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0. Serial mediation was examined with Hayes' PROCESS macro (Model 6), and indirect effects were evaluated using 5,000 bootstrap resamples with 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Greater loneliness was linked to higher PUCAI. Social anxiety and self-control each showed significant indirect associations, and the proposed statistical model indicated a significant serial indirect effect involving these two variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results offer further insight into the potential psychological pathways associated with PUCAI among college students. The findings suggest that loneliness, social anxiety, and self-regulatory capacities may represent potentially relevant factors to consider in future research and prevention efforts aimed at promoting healthy and responsible CAI use.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"17 ","pages":"1950646"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13662157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1950646","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Loneliness is an important public health concern associated with individuals' physical and mental wellbeing. As conversational artificial intelligence (CAI) becomes more widely used, concerns about its problematic use have attracted increasing attention. However, the link between loneliness and problematic use of conversational artificial intelligence (PUCAI) remains insufficiently understood. The current research explored the link between loneliness and PUCAI among college students, with social anxiety and self-control evaluated as serial mediators. These findings provide preliminary empirical insight into the psychological correlates of PUCAI and may inform future research and educational efforts aimed at promoting healthy and responsible CAI use.

Methods: Using convenience sampling, this cross-sectional study analyzed data from 400 undergraduate students enrolled at a university in western China. Research instruments included the Loneliness Scale, the PUCAI Scale, the Social Anxiety Scale, and the Self-Control Scale. Descriptive statistics and Pearson correlations were computed with IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0. Serial mediation was examined with Hayes' PROCESS macro (Model 6), and indirect effects were evaluated using 5,000 bootstrap resamples with 95% confidence intervals.

Results: Greater loneliness was linked to higher PUCAI. Social anxiety and self-control each showed significant indirect associations, and the proposed statistical model indicated a significant serial indirect effect involving these two variables.

Conclusion: The results offer further insight into the potential psychological pathways associated with PUCAI among college students. The findings suggest that loneliness, social anxiety, and self-regulatory capacities may represent potentially relevant factors to consider in future research and prevention efforts aimed at promoting healthy and responsible CAI use.

大学生孤独感与会话人工智能使用的问题:社交焦虑和自我控制的系列中介作用
目的:孤独是一个与个人身心健康相关的重要公共卫生问题。随着会话式人工智能(CAI)的广泛应用,对其使用问题的担忧日益引起人们的关注。然而,孤独感和会话人工智能(PUCAI)使用问题之间的联系仍然没有得到充分的理解。本研究以社交焦虑和自我控制为连续中介因子,探讨了大学生孤独感与PUCAI之间的关系。这些发现为PUCAI的心理相关因素提供了初步的实证见解,并可能为未来的研究和教育工作提供信息,旨在促进健康和负责任的CAI使用。方法:采用方便抽样的方法,对中国西部某高校400名本科生的数据进行横断面分析。研究工具包括孤独感量表、PUCAI量表、社交焦虑量表和自我控制量表。使用IBM SPSS statistics 26.0进行描述性统计和Pearson相关性计算。采用Hayes' s PROCESS宏观(模型6)检验了序列中介,并使用5000个bootstrap样本(95%置信区间)评估了间接效应。结果:孤独感越大,PUCAI越高。社交焦虑与自我控制均表现出显著的间接关联,所建立的统计模型表明,这两个变量之间存在显著的串行间接效应。结论:研究结果进一步揭示了大学生PUCAI的潜在心理通路。研究结果表明,孤独、社交焦虑和自我调节能力可能是未来研究和预防工作中考虑的潜在相关因素,旨在促进健康和负责任的人工智能使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
7396
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书