Psychometric structure and score interpretation of the SCL-90 among Chinese first-year undergraduates: an analysis of an open dataset.

IF 3.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Frontiers in Psychology Pub Date : 2026-09-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1913286
Jinglei Wen, Yujiao Deng
{"title":"Psychometric structure and score interpretation of the SCL-90 among Chinese first-year undergraduates: an analysis of an open dataset.","authors":"Jinglei Wen, Yujiao Deng","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1913286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90) provides total and domain scores whose shared and distinct information remains debated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed an open dataset of 14,371 Chinese first-year undergraduates in calibration and validation halves. Four item-level structures (unidimensional, nine correlated factors, second-order, and orthogonal bifactor) were compared on the same 83 domain-scored items using robust maximum likelihood (MLR) in both halves and mean- and variance-adjusted weighted least squares (WLSMV) for ordered items in validation. A separate single-factor model included all 90 items. Evaluation combined absolute and relative fit, numerical diagnostics, loadings, residuals, and general and specific reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the 83-item comparison, the correlated-factor model had a non-positive-definite latent matrix. The bifactor model improved on the admissible second-order model, but its WLSMV comparative fit index (CFI) advantage was only 0.0079; MLR validation fit remained mixed (CFI = 0.849, Tucker-Lewis index [TLI] = 0.842, root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.045, standardized root mean square residual [SRMR] = 0.042). Under that MLR bifactor specification, general explained common variance (ECV) was 0.813 [0.804, 0.822] and omegaH was 0.963 [0.961, 0.965]. Specific omegaHS ranged from 0.017 to 0.293, with somatization, phobic anxiety, and hostility retaining comparatively more specific information. WLSMV general omegaH was 0.967 and specific omegaHS ranged from 0.005 to 0.186. The 90-item single-factor model showed limited incremental fit (MLR CFI = 0.769/0.773; WLSMV CFI = 0.896); RMSEA was 0.052/0.052 and 0.044, and residual dependence persisted. High 90-item alpha (0.978) therefore coexisted with departures from strict unidimensionality. An exploratory mixture audit yielded no stable class solution.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These data support a substantial general-severity component and uneven domain-specific information within the modeled 83-item structure. Its reliability decomposition does not establish that of the conventional 90-item total or global severity index. Independent-sample replication remains necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"17 ","pages":"1913286"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13661911/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1913286","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90) provides total and domain scores whose shared and distinct information remains debated.

Methods: We analyzed an open dataset of 14,371 Chinese first-year undergraduates in calibration and validation halves. Four item-level structures (unidimensional, nine correlated factors, second-order, and orthogonal bifactor) were compared on the same 83 domain-scored items using robust maximum likelihood (MLR) in both halves and mean- and variance-adjusted weighted least squares (WLSMV) for ordered items in validation. A separate single-factor model included all 90 items. Evaluation combined absolute and relative fit, numerical diagnostics, loadings, residuals, and general and specific reliability.

Results: For the 83-item comparison, the correlated-factor model had a non-positive-definite latent matrix. The bifactor model improved on the admissible second-order model, but its WLSMV comparative fit index (CFI) advantage was only 0.0079; MLR validation fit remained mixed (CFI = 0.849, Tucker-Lewis index [TLI] = 0.842, root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.045, standardized root mean square residual [SRMR] = 0.042). Under that MLR bifactor specification, general explained common variance (ECV) was 0.813 [0.804, 0.822] and omegaH was 0.963 [0.961, 0.965]. Specific omegaHS ranged from 0.017 to 0.293, with somatization, phobic anxiety, and hostility retaining comparatively more specific information. WLSMV general omegaH was 0.967 and specific omegaHS ranged from 0.005 to 0.186. The 90-item single-factor model showed limited incremental fit (MLR CFI = 0.769/0.773; WLSMV CFI = 0.896); RMSEA was 0.052/0.052 and 0.044, and residual dependence persisted. High 90-item alpha (0.978) therefore coexisted with departures from strict unidimensionality. An exploratory mixture audit yielded no stable class solution.

Discussion: These data support a substantial general-severity component and uneven domain-specific information within the modeled 83-item structure. Its reliability decomposition does not establish that of the conventional 90-item total or global severity index. Independent-sample replication remains necessary.

中国一年级大学生SCL-90的心理测量结构与得分解释:一个开放数据集的分析。
症状检查表-90 (SCL-90)提供总分和域分数,其共享和不同的信息仍有争议。方法:我们分析了14371名中国一年级本科生的开放数据集,分为校准和验证两部分。在相同的83个领域得分项目上,使用两半的鲁棒最大似然(MLR)和有序项目的经均值和方差调整的加权最小二乘(WLSMV)进行验证,比较了四个项目水平结构(单维、9个相关因素、二阶和正交双因素)。一个单独的单因素模型包括所有90个项目。评估结合了绝对和相对拟合,数值诊断,负荷,残差,一般和特定的可靠性。结果:对于83项比较,相关因素模型具有非正定的潜在矩阵。双因子模型在容许二阶模型的基础上进行了改进,但其WLSMV比较拟合指数(CFI)优势仅为0.0079;MLR验证拟合仍然混合(CFI = 0.849, Tucker-Lewis指数[TLI] = 0.842,近似均方根误差[RMSEA] = 0.045,标准化均方根残差[SRMR] = 0.042)。在MLR双因素规范下,一般解释共同方差(ECV)为0.813 [0.804,0.822],omegaH为0.963[0.961,0.965]。特异性ω - ahs范围从0.017到0.293,躯体化、恐惧焦虑和敌意保留了相对更具体的信息。WLSMV一般ω - ah为0.967,特异性ω - ah范围为0.005至0.186。90项单因素模型显示有限的增量拟合(MLR CFI = 0.769/0.773; WLSMV CFI = 0.896);RMSEA分别为0.052/0.052和0.044,剩余依赖性持续存在。因此,高90项alpha(0.978)与严格单维性的偏离并存。探索性混合审计没有产生稳定的类解。讨论:在建模的83项结构中,这些数据支持大量的一般严重性组件和不均匀的特定于领域的信息。它的可靠性分解不建立传统的90项总严重程度指数或全局严重程度指数。独立样本复制仍然是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
7396
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书