Professional Readiness and Implementation Barriers for Non-invasive Neuromodulation Among Attendees of an Educational Module in Mexico: An Exploratory Cross-sectional Survey.

IF 1.8 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Eleonora Ocampo-Coronado, Daniel San-Juan, Paola Denisse Ascencio-Ceja, Alan Hinojosa-Godínez, Carlos Trenado, Cristina Nachely Subia-Castro, Luis Fernando Díaz-López, Jesús Alejandro Aldana-López, Alejandro Velasco-Hernandez, Manuel Zorrilla-Hernandez
{"title":"Professional Readiness and Implementation Barriers for Non-invasive Neuromodulation Among Attendees of an Educational Module in Mexico: An Exploratory Cross-sectional Survey.","authors":"Eleonora Ocampo-Coronado, Daniel San-Juan, Paola Denisse Ascencio-Ceja, Alan Hinojosa-Godínez, Carlos Trenado, Cristina Nachely Subia-Castro, Luis Fernando Díaz-López, Jesús Alejandro Aldana-López, Alejandro Velasco-Hernandez, Manuel Zorrilla-Hernandez","doi":"10.1177/02537176261488423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-invasive neuromodulation is increasingly used in selected neuropsychiatric disorders, but implementation depends on professional readiness, training, access, perceived legitimacy, and local feasibility. This study assessed knowledge, perceptions, barriers, baseline willingness to recommend neuromodulation, and future implementation or referral intention among attendees of an educational neuromodulation module in Mexico.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional survey among attendees of an in-person educational neuromodulation module at a specialized academic congress in Mexico. Anonymous, real-time items assessed baseline familiarity; perceptions of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, and transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation; perceived barriers; baseline willingness to recommend neuromodulation; and future implementation or referral intention. Analyses used descriptive statistics, non-parametric tests, Spearman correlations, and exploratory univariate logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 111 participants answered at least one item. Baseline familiarity was limited: 22.2% reported basic knowledge, and 84.6% strongly disagreed that they had personal equipment. Baseline willingness to recommend neuromodulation was 63.2% and was associated with basic knowledge (OR = 2.90; 95% CI = 1.44-5.84; <i>p</i> = .003), prior exposure (OR = 1.58; 95% CI = 1.07-2.35; <i>p</i> = .023), and perceived sufficiency of evidence (OR = 1.91; 95% CI = 1.21-2.99; <i>p</i> = .005). The main barriers were cost/accessibility (78.0%), patients' lack of knowledge (36.6%), and lack of technical training (29.3%). Final-block implementation-intention findings were exploratory because of the small effective denominator.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among attendees of an educational neuromodulation module in Mexico, receptivity toward non-invasive neuromodulation was favorable, but operational readiness was limited. Responsible implementation may benefit from competency-based training, referral pathways, patient education, regulatory literacy, and sustainable access models.</p>","PeriodicalId":13476,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"02537176261488423"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13661823/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176261488423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Non-invasive neuromodulation is increasingly used in selected neuropsychiatric disorders, but implementation depends on professional readiness, training, access, perceived legitimacy, and local feasibility. This study assessed knowledge, perceptions, barriers, baseline willingness to recommend neuromodulation, and future implementation or referral intention among attendees of an educational neuromodulation module in Mexico.

Methods: We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional survey among attendees of an in-person educational neuromodulation module at a specialized academic congress in Mexico. Anonymous, real-time items assessed baseline familiarity; perceptions of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, and transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation; perceived barriers; baseline willingness to recommend neuromodulation; and future implementation or referral intention. Analyses used descriptive statistics, non-parametric tests, Spearman correlations, and exploratory univariate logistic regression.

Results: A total of 111 participants answered at least one item. Baseline familiarity was limited: 22.2% reported basic knowledge, and 84.6% strongly disagreed that they had personal equipment. Baseline willingness to recommend neuromodulation was 63.2% and was associated with basic knowledge (OR = 2.90; 95% CI = 1.44-5.84; p = .003), prior exposure (OR = 1.58; 95% CI = 1.07-2.35; p = .023), and perceived sufficiency of evidence (OR = 1.91; 95% CI = 1.21-2.99; p = .005). The main barriers were cost/accessibility (78.0%), patients' lack of knowledge (36.6%), and lack of technical training (29.3%). Final-block implementation-intention findings were exploratory because of the small effective denominator.

Conclusions: Among attendees of an educational neuromodulation module in Mexico, receptivity toward non-invasive neuromodulation was favorable, but operational readiness was limited. Responsible implementation may benefit from competency-based training, referral pathways, patient education, regulatory literacy, and sustainable access models.

在墨西哥的一个教育模块的参与者中,非侵入性神经调节的专业准备和实施障碍:一项探索性横断面调查。
背景:非侵入性神经调节越来越多地用于特定的神经精神疾病,但实施取决于专业准备,培训,获取,感知合法性和当地可行性。本研究评估了墨西哥教育神经调节模块参与者的知识、认知、障碍、推荐神经调节的基线意愿以及未来的实施或转诊意向。方法:我们在墨西哥的一个专业学术会议上对一个面对面的教育神经调节模块的与会者进行了探索性的横断面调查。匿名、实时项目评估基线熟悉度;反复经颅磁刺激、经颅直流电刺激和经皮迷走神经刺激的感知;感知障碍;推荐神经调节的基线意愿;以及今后实施或转诊的意向。分析采用描述性统计、非参数检验、Spearman相关性和探索性单变量逻辑回归。结果:共有111名参与者回答了至少一个问题。基线熟悉程度有限:22.2%报告基本知识,84.6%强烈不同意他们有个人设备。推荐神经调节的基线意愿为63.2%,与基础知识(OR = 2.90; 95% CI = 1.44-5.84; p = 0.003)、既往暴露(OR = 1.58; 95% CI = 1.07-2.35; p = 0.023)和感知证据充分性(OR = 1.91; 95% CI = 1.21-2.99; p = 0.005)相关。主要障碍是成本/可及性(78.0%)、患者缺乏相关知识(36.6%)和缺乏技术培训(29.3%)。由于有效分母较小,最终块实现意图的发现是探索性的。结论:在墨西哥一个教育神经调节模块的参与者中,对非侵入性神经调节的接受度是有利的,但操作准备是有限的。负责任的实施可能受益于基于能力的培训、转诊途径、患者教育、监管素养和可持续获取模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
116
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine (ISSN 0253-7176) was started in 1978 as the official publication of the Indian Psychiatric Society South Zonal Branch. The journal allows free access (Open Access) and is published Bimonthly. The Journal includes but is not limited to review articles, original research, opinions, and letters. The Editor and publisher accept no legal responsibility for any opinions, omissions or errors by the authors, nor do they approve of any product advertised within the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书