{"title":"Self-reported chewing or swallowing problems and episodic memory performance in older Americans: a longitudinal cohort study.","authors":"Fei He, Chonghao Yao, Xuteng Kang, Yihao Ding, Haoqi Tu, Sijia Na","doi":"10.3389/fnagi.2026.1899130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Impaired mastication is a plausible modifiable risk factor for dementia, but long-term longitudinal evidence using functional metrics instead of tooth counts is limited. This study investigated the association between self-reported chewing/swallowing problems and cognitive decline trajectories in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed repeated NHATS rounds 7-14. The primary analytic sample comprised 8,636 participants contributing 34,571 person-round observations with valid exposure and immediate plus delayed 10-word recall. Raw total recall (0-20) was the primary outcome. Linear mixed models used rounds since each participant's first complete analytic assessment, time-varying exposure, random intercepts and random slopes, and adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, comorbidity count, depressive symptoms, hearing impairment, and vision impairment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the first complete analytic assessment, 842 participants (9.7%) reported chewing or swallowing problems. In the primary model, the exposure-by-time interaction was -0.035 recall points per follow-up round (95% CI, -0.075 to 0.005; <i>p</i> = 0.086). The contemporaneous exposure coefficient at follow-up round 0 was 0.034 points (95% CI, -0.106 to 0.173; <i>p</i> = 0.638). Results were similar when participants with one assessment were excluded and when the outcome was modeled as immediate recall, delayed recall, or standardized against a common reference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this analytic NHATS sample, self-reported chewing or swallowing problems were not independently associated with a statistically significant difference in episodic-memory trajectory after sensory and other prespecified adjustment. The item may warrant oral, swallowing, functional, or neurological assessment, but it is not a specific marker of masticatory dysfunction or cognitive risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":12450,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","volume":"18 ","pages":"1899130"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13661535/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2026.1899130","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Impaired mastication is a plausible modifiable risk factor for dementia, but long-term longitudinal evidence using functional metrics instead of tooth counts is limited. This study investigated the association between self-reported chewing/swallowing problems and cognitive decline trajectories in older adults.
Methods: We analyzed repeated NHATS rounds 7-14. The primary analytic sample comprised 8,636 participants contributing 34,571 person-round observations with valid exposure and immediate plus delayed 10-word recall. Raw total recall (0-20) was the primary outcome. Linear mixed models used rounds since each participant's first complete analytic assessment, time-varying exposure, random intercepts and random slopes, and adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, comorbidity count, depressive symptoms, hearing impairment, and vision impairment.
Results: At the first complete analytic assessment, 842 participants (9.7%) reported chewing or swallowing problems. In the primary model, the exposure-by-time interaction was -0.035 recall points per follow-up round (95% CI, -0.075 to 0.005; p = 0.086). The contemporaneous exposure coefficient at follow-up round 0 was 0.034 points (95% CI, -0.106 to 0.173; p = 0.638). Results were similar when participants with one assessment were excluded and when the outcome was modeled as immediate recall, delayed recall, or standardized against a common reference.
Conclusion: In this analytic NHATS sample, self-reported chewing or swallowing problems were not independently associated with a statistically significant difference in episodic-memory trajectory after sensory and other prespecified adjustment. The item may warrant oral, swallowing, functional, or neurological assessment, but it is not a specific marker of masticatory dysfunction or cognitive risk.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of the mechanisms of Central Nervous System aging and age-related neural diseases. Specialty Chief Editor Thomas Wisniewski at the New York University School of Medicine is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.