Self-reported chewing or swallowing problems and episodic memory performance in older Americans: a longitudinal cohort study.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience Pub Date : 2026-09-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnagi.2026.1899130
Fei He, Chonghao Yao, Xuteng Kang, Yihao Ding, Haoqi Tu, Sijia Na
{"title":"Self-reported chewing or swallowing problems and episodic memory performance in older Americans: a longitudinal cohort study.","authors":"Fei He, Chonghao Yao, Xuteng Kang, Yihao Ding, Haoqi Tu, Sijia Na","doi":"10.3389/fnagi.2026.1899130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Impaired mastication is a plausible modifiable risk factor for dementia, but long-term longitudinal evidence using functional metrics instead of tooth counts is limited. This study investigated the association between self-reported chewing/swallowing problems and cognitive decline trajectories in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed repeated NHATS rounds 7-14. The primary analytic sample comprised 8,636 participants contributing 34,571 person-round observations with valid exposure and immediate plus delayed 10-word recall. Raw total recall (0-20) was the primary outcome. Linear mixed models used rounds since each participant's first complete analytic assessment, time-varying exposure, random intercepts and random slopes, and adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, comorbidity count, depressive symptoms, hearing impairment, and vision impairment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the first complete analytic assessment, 842 participants (9.7%) reported chewing or swallowing problems. In the primary model, the exposure-by-time interaction was -0.035 recall points per follow-up round (95% CI, -0.075 to 0.005; <i>p</i> = 0.086). The contemporaneous exposure coefficient at follow-up round 0 was 0.034 points (95% CI, -0.106 to 0.173; <i>p</i> = 0.638). Results were similar when participants with one assessment were excluded and when the outcome was modeled as immediate recall, delayed recall, or standardized against a common reference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this analytic NHATS sample, self-reported chewing or swallowing problems were not independently associated with a statistically significant difference in episodic-memory trajectory after sensory and other prespecified adjustment. The item may warrant oral, swallowing, functional, or neurological assessment, but it is not a specific marker of masticatory dysfunction or cognitive risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":12450,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","volume":"18 ","pages":"1899130"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13661535/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2026.1899130","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Impaired mastication is a plausible modifiable risk factor for dementia, but long-term longitudinal evidence using functional metrics instead of tooth counts is limited. This study investigated the association between self-reported chewing/swallowing problems and cognitive decline trajectories in older adults.

Methods: We analyzed repeated NHATS rounds 7-14. The primary analytic sample comprised 8,636 participants contributing 34,571 person-round observations with valid exposure and immediate plus delayed 10-word recall. Raw total recall (0-20) was the primary outcome. Linear mixed models used rounds since each participant's first complete analytic assessment, time-varying exposure, random intercepts and random slopes, and adjustment for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, comorbidity count, depressive symptoms, hearing impairment, and vision impairment.

Results: At the first complete analytic assessment, 842 participants (9.7%) reported chewing or swallowing problems. In the primary model, the exposure-by-time interaction was -0.035 recall points per follow-up round (95% CI, -0.075 to 0.005; p = 0.086). The contemporaneous exposure coefficient at follow-up round 0 was 0.034 points (95% CI, -0.106 to 0.173; p = 0.638). Results were similar when participants with one assessment were excluded and when the outcome was modeled as immediate recall, delayed recall, or standardized against a common reference.

Conclusion: In this analytic NHATS sample, self-reported chewing or swallowing problems were not independently associated with a statistically significant difference in episodic-memory trajectory after sensory and other prespecified adjustment. The item may warrant oral, swallowing, functional, or neurological assessment, but it is not a specific marker of masticatory dysfunction or cognitive risk.

美国老年人自我报告的咀嚼或吞咽问题和情景记忆表现:一项纵向队列研究。
背景:咀嚼功能受损是痴呆的一个可能的可改变的危险因素,但使用功能指标代替牙齿计数的长期纵向证据是有限的。本研究调查了老年人自我报告的咀嚼/吞咽问题与认知能力下降轨迹之间的关系。方法:我们对重复的NHATS进行7-14轮分析。主要分析样本包括8,636名参与者,贡献了34,571人-轮观察,有效暴露和即时加延迟10个单词的回忆。原始总回忆(0-20)是主要结果。线性混合模型从每个参与者第一次完整的分析评估开始使用轮次,时变暴露,随机截距和随机斜率,并根据年龄、性别、种族/民族、教育程度、合并症数量、抑郁症状、听力障碍和视力障碍进行调整。结果:在第一次完整的分析评估中,842名参与者(9.7%)报告了咀嚼或吞咽问题。在初级模型中,暴露-时间交互作用为每轮随访-0.035回忆点(95% CI, -0.075至0.005;p = 0.086)。随访第0轮时同期暴露系数为0.034点(95% CI, -0.106 ~ 0.173; p = 0.638)。当排除一种评估的参与者时,当结果被建模为即时回忆、延迟回忆或根据共同参考标准进行标准化时,结果相似。结论:在这个NHATS分析样本中,自我报告的咀嚼或吞咽问题与经过感觉和其他预先设定的调整后的情节记忆轨迹没有统计学上的显著差异独立相关。该项目可能需要对口腔、吞咽、功能或神经学进行评估,但它不是咀嚼功能障碍或认知风险的特定标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
1426
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of the mechanisms of Central Nervous System aging and age-related neural diseases. Specialty Chief Editor Thomas Wisniewski at the New York University School of Medicine is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书