{"title":"Molecular HLA matching in kidney transplantation: the emerging role of eplet mismatch analysis.","authors":"Simmi Mehra, Rajni Chauhan, Aseem Kumar Tiwari, Vyas M Shingatgeri, Gunjan Bhardwaj, Shubham Gupta, Simran Kahlon, Punit Kumar","doi":"10.1080/1744666X.2026.2749714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for end-stage kidney disease, but long-term graft survival remains limited by alloimmune injury, particularly donor-specific antibody-mediated rejection. This review evaluates molecular HLA matching as an approach to improve donor-recipient compatibility assessment beyond conventional antigen-level matching.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The biological basis of HLA epitopes and eplets is described, with emphasis on HLAMatchmaker, HLA-EMMA, PIRCHE-II, and related computational approaches. Evidence linking molecular mismatch with de novo donor-specific antibodies, antibody-mediated rejection, chronic allograft injury, and graft survival is reviewed. Qualitative eplet immunogenicity, structural accessibility, amino-acid properties, antibody verification, and HLA-DQ-associated risk are also examined. A literature search was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus, focusing on studies published during the preceding 10 years, employing terms related to kidney transplantation, HLA eplet mismatch, molecular HLA matching, donor-specific antibodies, rejection, and graft outcomes.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>HLA eplet-based matching may improve immunological risk stratification and individualized surveillance. However, algorithmic variability, incomplete antibody verification, differences in HLA typing resolution, population limitations, and lack of standardized thresholds restrict implementation. Prospective multi-center studies are needed to establish clinical utility, cost-effectiveness, and whether molecularly informed donor selection or monitoring improves patient and graft outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12175,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2026.2749714","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for end-stage kidney disease, but long-term graft survival remains limited by alloimmune injury, particularly donor-specific antibody-mediated rejection. This review evaluates molecular HLA matching as an approach to improve donor-recipient compatibility assessment beyond conventional antigen-level matching.
Areas covered: The biological basis of HLA epitopes and eplets is described, with emphasis on HLAMatchmaker, HLA-EMMA, PIRCHE-II, and related computational approaches. Evidence linking molecular mismatch with de novo donor-specific antibodies, antibody-mediated rejection, chronic allograft injury, and graft survival is reviewed. Qualitative eplet immunogenicity, structural accessibility, amino-acid properties, antibody verification, and HLA-DQ-associated risk are also examined. A literature search was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus, focusing on studies published during the preceding 10 years, employing terms related to kidney transplantation, HLA eplet mismatch, molecular HLA matching, donor-specific antibodies, rejection, and graft outcomes.
Expert opinion: HLA eplet-based matching may improve immunological risk stratification and individualized surveillance. However, algorithmic variability, incomplete antibody verification, differences in HLA typing resolution, population limitations, and lack of standardized thresholds restrict implementation. Prospective multi-center studies are needed to establish clinical utility, cost-effectiveness, and whether molecularly informed donor selection or monitoring improves patient and graft outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Clinical Immunology (ISSN 1744-666X) provides expert analysis and commentary regarding the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic modalities in clinical immunology. Members of the International Editorial Advisory Panel of Expert Review of Clinical Immunology are the forefront of their area of expertise. This panel works with our dedicated editorial team to identify the most important and topical review themes and the corresponding expert(s) most appropriate to provide commentary and analysis. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the finished reviews provide an essential contribution to decision-making in clinical immunology.
Articles focus on the following key areas:
• Therapeutic overviews of specific immunologic disorders highlighting optimal therapy and prospects for new medicines
• Performance and benefits of newly approved therapeutic agents
• New diagnostic approaches
• Screening and patient stratification
• Pharmacoeconomic studies
• New therapeutic indications for existing therapies
• Adverse effects, occurrence and reduction
• Prospects for medicines in late-stage trials approaching regulatory approval
• Novel treatment strategies
• Epidemiological studies
• Commentary and comparison of treatment guidelines
Topics include infection and immunity, inflammation, host defense mechanisms, congenital and acquired immunodeficiencies, anaphylaxis and allergy, systemic immune diseases, organ-specific inflammatory diseases, transplantation immunology, endocrinology and diabetes, cancer immunology, neuroimmunology and hematological diseases.