Molecular HLA matching in kidney transplantation: the emerging role of eplet mismatch analysis.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Simmi Mehra, Rajni Chauhan, Aseem Kumar Tiwari, Vyas M Shingatgeri, Gunjan Bhardwaj, Shubham Gupta, Simran Kahlon, Punit Kumar
{"title":"Molecular HLA matching in kidney transplantation: the emerging role of eplet mismatch analysis.","authors":"Simmi Mehra, Rajni Chauhan, Aseem Kumar Tiwari, Vyas M Shingatgeri, Gunjan Bhardwaj, Shubham Gupta, Simran Kahlon, Punit Kumar","doi":"10.1080/1744666X.2026.2749714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for end-stage kidney disease, but long-term graft survival remains limited by alloimmune injury, particularly donor-specific antibody-mediated rejection. This review evaluates molecular HLA matching as an approach to improve donor-recipient compatibility assessment beyond conventional antigen-level matching.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The biological basis of HLA epitopes and eplets is described, with emphasis on HLAMatchmaker, HLA-EMMA, PIRCHE-II, and related computational approaches. Evidence linking molecular mismatch with de novo donor-specific antibodies, antibody-mediated rejection, chronic allograft injury, and graft survival is reviewed. Qualitative eplet immunogenicity, structural accessibility, amino-acid properties, antibody verification, and HLA-DQ-associated risk are also examined. A literature search was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus, focusing on studies published during the preceding 10 years, employing terms related to kidney transplantation, HLA eplet mismatch, molecular HLA matching, donor-specific antibodies, rejection, and graft outcomes.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>HLA eplet-based matching may improve immunological risk stratification and individualized surveillance. However, algorithmic variability, incomplete antibody verification, differences in HLA typing resolution, population limitations, and lack of standardized thresholds restrict implementation. Prospective multi-center studies are needed to establish clinical utility, cost-effectiveness, and whether molecularly informed donor selection or monitoring improves patient and graft outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12175,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2026.2749714","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for end-stage kidney disease, but long-term graft survival remains limited by alloimmune injury, particularly donor-specific antibody-mediated rejection. This review evaluates molecular HLA matching as an approach to improve donor-recipient compatibility assessment beyond conventional antigen-level matching.

Areas covered: The biological basis of HLA epitopes and eplets is described, with emphasis on HLAMatchmaker, HLA-EMMA, PIRCHE-II, and related computational approaches. Evidence linking molecular mismatch with de novo donor-specific antibodies, antibody-mediated rejection, chronic allograft injury, and graft survival is reviewed. Qualitative eplet immunogenicity, structural accessibility, amino-acid properties, antibody verification, and HLA-DQ-associated risk are also examined. A literature search was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus, focusing on studies published during the preceding 10 years, employing terms related to kidney transplantation, HLA eplet mismatch, molecular HLA matching, donor-specific antibodies, rejection, and graft outcomes.

Expert opinion: HLA eplet-based matching may improve immunological risk stratification and individualized surveillance. However, algorithmic variability, incomplete antibody verification, differences in HLA typing resolution, population limitations, and lack of standardized thresholds restrict implementation. Prospective multi-center studies are needed to establish clinical utility, cost-effectiveness, and whether molecularly informed donor selection or monitoring improves patient and graft outcomes.

HLA分子匹配在肾移植中的作用:基因不匹配分析的新作用。
肾移植是终末期肾病的首选治疗方法,但移植的长期存活仍然受到同种免疫损伤的限制,特别是供体特异性抗体介导的排斥反应。这篇综述评价分子HLA匹配作为一种超越传统抗原水平匹配的方法来改善供体-受体相容性评估。涵盖领域:描述了HLA表位和小序列的生物学基础,重点介绍了HLAMatchmaker、HLA- emma、PIRCHE-II以及相关的计算方法。分子错配与新生供体特异性抗体、抗体介导的排斥反应、慢性同种异体移植物损伤和移植物存活之间的证据进行了综述。定性eplet免疫原性,结构可及性,氨基酸性质,抗体验证和hla - dq相关的风险也进行了检查。使用PubMed/MEDLINE和Scopus进行文献检索,重点关注过去10年发表的研究,使用与肾移植、HLA等位基因错配、HLA分子匹配、供体特异性抗体、排斥反应和移植结果相关的术语。专家意见:基于HLA的匹配可以改善免疫风险分层和个体化监测。然而,算法的可变性、不完整的抗体验证、HLA分型分辨率的差异、人群限制和缺乏标准化阈值限制了实现。需要前瞻性多中心研究来确定临床效用、成本效益,以及分子知情的供体选择或监测是否能改善患者和移植结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
221
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Clinical Immunology (ISSN 1744-666X) provides expert analysis and commentary regarding the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic modalities in clinical immunology. Members of the International Editorial Advisory Panel of Expert Review of Clinical Immunology are the forefront of their area of expertise. This panel works with our dedicated editorial team to identify the most important and topical review themes and the corresponding expert(s) most appropriate to provide commentary and analysis. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the finished reviews provide an essential contribution to decision-making in clinical immunology. Articles focus on the following key areas: • Therapeutic overviews of specific immunologic disorders highlighting optimal therapy and prospects for new medicines • Performance and benefits of newly approved therapeutic agents • New diagnostic approaches • Screening and patient stratification • Pharmacoeconomic studies • New therapeutic indications for existing therapies • Adverse effects, occurrence and reduction • Prospects for medicines in late-stage trials approaching regulatory approval • Novel treatment strategies • Epidemiological studies • Commentary and comparison of treatment guidelines Topics include infection and immunity, inflammation, host defense mechanisms, congenital and acquired immunodeficiencies, anaphylaxis and allergy, systemic immune diseases, organ-specific inflammatory diseases, transplantation immunology, endocrinology and diabetes, cancer immunology, neuroimmunology and hematological diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书