Flourishing in university students: cross-sectional associations with personal and social FoMO, loneliness, and belonging.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience Pub Date : 2026-09-29 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnbeh.2026.1914187
Osman Akay
{"title":"Flourishing in university students: cross-sectional associations with personal and social FoMO, loneliness, and belonging.","authors":"Osman Akay","doi":"10.3389/fnbeh.2026.1914187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fear of missing out (FoMO), loneliness, and belonging concern different aspects of students' relational experience, but their shared and unique cross-sectional associations with flourishing remain unclear. This study examined these associations in university students in Türkiye while distinguishing Personal from Social FoMO and acceptance/inclusion from rejection/exclusion. An online cross-sectional survey was completed by 499 students aged 18-30 years (M = 22.13, SD = 3.23; 76.4% female). Factor structure and internal consistency were examined before Pearson correlations, hierarchical regression with HC3 robust standard errors, relative-importance analysis, and sensitivity analyses were conducted. At the zero-order level, both FoMO facets and loneliness were negatively associated with flourishing, whereas acceptance/inclusion and reverse-scored rejection/exclusion were positively associated with flourishing (all <i>p</i> < 0.001). The final seven-predictor model explained 51.2% of flourishing variance. Loneliness showed a small negative unique association (<i>β</i> = -0.136, <i>p</i> = 0.016), acceptance/inclusion the largest positive association (<i>β</i> = 0.526, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and reverse-scored rejection/exclusion a smaller positive association (<i>β</i> = 0.138, <i>p</i> = 0.023); neither FoMO facet had a significant unique coefficient. Acceptance/inclusion and loneliness remained significant after explicitly relational Flourishing Scale items were removed, whereas the rejection/exclusion coefficient did not. These findings describe concurrent associations rather than a causal sequence, and they point to no specific intervention target. The cross-sectional self-report design, convenience and snowball sampling, and female-predominant sample limit causal inference and generalizability.</p>","PeriodicalId":12368,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":"20 ","pages":"1914187"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13658611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2026.1914187","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fear of missing out (FoMO), loneliness, and belonging concern different aspects of students' relational experience, but their shared and unique cross-sectional associations with flourishing remain unclear. This study examined these associations in university students in Türkiye while distinguishing Personal from Social FoMO and acceptance/inclusion from rejection/exclusion. An online cross-sectional survey was completed by 499 students aged 18-30 years (M = 22.13, SD = 3.23; 76.4% female). Factor structure and internal consistency were examined before Pearson correlations, hierarchical regression with HC3 robust standard errors, relative-importance analysis, and sensitivity analyses were conducted. At the zero-order level, both FoMO facets and loneliness were negatively associated with flourishing, whereas acceptance/inclusion and reverse-scored rejection/exclusion were positively associated with flourishing (all p < 0.001). The final seven-predictor model explained 51.2% of flourishing variance. Loneliness showed a small negative unique association (β = -0.136, p = 0.016), acceptance/inclusion the largest positive association (β = 0.526, p < 0.001), and reverse-scored rejection/exclusion a smaller positive association (β = 0.138, p = 0.023); neither FoMO facet had a significant unique coefficient. Acceptance/inclusion and loneliness remained significant after explicitly relational Flourishing Scale items were removed, whereas the rejection/exclusion coefficient did not. These findings describe concurrent associations rather than a causal sequence, and they point to no specific intervention target. The cross-sectional self-report design, convenience and snowball sampling, and female-predominant sample limit causal inference and generalizability.

大学生的繁荣:与个人和社会FoMO、孤独和归属感的横断面关联。
对错过的恐惧(FoMO)、孤独和归属感涉及学生关系体验的不同方面,但它们与繁荣的共同和独特的横截面联系尚不清楚。本研究在区分个人FoMO与社会FoMO、接受/包容与拒绝/排斥的同时,考察了 rkiye大学学生的这些关联。在线横断面调查499名年龄在18-30岁 之间的学生(M = 22.13,SD = 3.23,76.4%为女性)。在Pearson相关性、HC3稳健标准误差层次回归、相对重要性分析和敏感性分析之前,对因素结构和内部一致性进行检验。在零水平,FoMO方面和孤独都是负相关的,而接受/拒绝/排斥包容和reverse-scored积极与繁荣(所有p β = -0.136,p = 0.016),验收/包含最大的正相关(β = 0.526,p β = 0.138,p = 0.023);两个FoMO面都没有显著的唯一系数。在明确的关系繁荣量表项目被删除后,接受/包容和孤独感仍然显著,而拒绝/排斥系数则没有。这些发现描述的是同时发生的关联,而不是因果关系,它们没有指出具体的干预目标。横断面自我报告设计、便利性和滚雪球抽样以及女性主导的样本限制了因果推断和推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying behavior. Field Chief Editor Nuno Sousa at the Instituto de Pesquisa em Ciências da Vida e da Saúde (ICVS) is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. This journal publishes major insights into the neural mechanisms of animal and human behavior, and welcomes articles studying the interplay between behavior and its neurobiological basis at all levels: from molecular biology and genetics, to morphological, biochemical, neurochemical, electrophysiological, neuroendocrine, pharmacological, and neuroimaging studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书