Effectiveness of technology-enabled teleophthalmology and emerging retinal imaging techniques for diabetic retinopathy screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
{"title":"Effectiveness of technology-enabled teleophthalmology and emerging retinal imaging techniques for diabetic retinopathy screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Kai-Yang Chen, Hoi-Chun Chan, Chi-Ming Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.diabres.2026.113610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a major microvascular complication of diabetes and causes preventable visual loss. Technology-enabled screening can extend retinal assessment beyond specialist settings and strengthen screening, referral, and follow-up across diabetes care pathways.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically reviewed randomized and non-randomized implementation studies, diagnostic-accuracy and comparative retinal-imaging studies, and economic evaluations of technology-enabled DR screening. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to 23 May 2026 without language restriction. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment. Random-effects meta-analyses synthesized comparative and proportional outcomes, and GRADE assessed certainty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three studies were included. Teleophthalmology increased DR screening uptake/completion versus usual care or pre-implementation practice (RR 1.966, 95% CI 1.451-2.664; I<sup>2</sup> = 75.2%) and improved adherence to recommended eye care (OR 2.464, 95% CI 1.477-4.112; I<sup>2</sup> = 66.47%). The pooled ungradable-image rate was 7.4% (95% CI 3.0%-17.1%; I<sup>2</sup> = 59.17%). Advanced retinal imaging showed pooled sensitivity of 97.59% (95% CI 94.50%-100.00%; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%) and specificity of 91.22% (95% CI 78.46%-100.00%; I<sup>2</sup> = 88.7%) for prespecified vascular lesion detection. OCTA demonstrated a pooled eye-level retinal neovascularization detection yield of 63.6% (95% CI 49.9%-75.4%; I<sup>2</sup> = 46.29%). Economic evaluations supported cost-effective or cost-saving technology-enabled screening across assessed health systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Technology-enabled DR care improves screening participation, adherence, and health-system efficiency, supporting integration of teleophthalmology and advanced imaging into scalable diabetes complication-management pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":11249,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","volume":" ","pages":"113610"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2026.113610","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a major microvascular complication of diabetes and causes preventable visual loss. Technology-enabled screening can extend retinal assessment beyond specialist settings and strengthen screening, referral, and follow-up across diabetes care pathways.
Methods: We systematically reviewed randomized and non-randomized implementation studies, diagnostic-accuracy and comparative retinal-imaging studies, and economic evaluations of technology-enabled DR screening. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to 23 May 2026 without language restriction. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment. Random-effects meta-analyses synthesized comparative and proportional outcomes, and GRADE assessed certainty.
Results: Thirty-three studies were included. Teleophthalmology increased DR screening uptake/completion versus usual care or pre-implementation practice (RR 1.966, 95% CI 1.451-2.664; I2 = 75.2%) and improved adherence to recommended eye care (OR 2.464, 95% CI 1.477-4.112; I2 = 66.47%). The pooled ungradable-image rate was 7.4% (95% CI 3.0%-17.1%; I2 = 59.17%). Advanced retinal imaging showed pooled sensitivity of 97.59% (95% CI 94.50%-100.00%; I2 = 0%) and specificity of 91.22% (95% CI 78.46%-100.00%; I2 = 88.7%) for prespecified vascular lesion detection. OCTA demonstrated a pooled eye-level retinal neovascularization detection yield of 63.6% (95% CI 49.9%-75.4%; I2 = 46.29%). Economic evaluations supported cost-effective or cost-saving technology-enabled screening across assessed health systems.
Conclusion: Technology-enabled DR care improves screening participation, adherence, and health-system efficiency, supporting integration of teleophthalmology and advanced imaging into scalable diabetes complication-management pathways.
期刊介绍：
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice is an international journal for health-care providers and clinically oriented researchers that publishes high-quality original research articles and expert reviews in diabetes and related areas. The role of the journal is to provide a venue for dissemination of knowledge and discussion of topics related to diabetes clinical research and patient care. Topics of focus include translational science, genetics, immunology, nutrition, psychosocial research, epidemiology, prevention, socio-economic research, complications, new treatments, technologies and therapy.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
