Liposomal Bupivacaine Combined with Bupivacaine vs Ropivacaine for Paravertebral Blockade in Single-Port Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Propensity-Matched Comparison of Postoperative Opioid Use.
{"title":"Liposomal Bupivacaine Combined with Bupivacaine vs Ropivacaine for Paravertebral Blockade in Single-Port Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Propensity-Matched Comparison of Postoperative Opioid Use.","authors":"Wenchuan Guan, Guanyu Yang, Jing Sang, Liumei Li, Qinjun Chu","doi":"10.2147/DDDT.S642610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effect of preoperative single-injection paravertebral block using liposomal bupivacaine/bupivacaine mixture versus ropivacaine on cumulative postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing thoracic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included adult patients who underwent elective single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (wedge resection, segmentectomy, or lobectomy) between January 2024 and February 2026. Patients received an ultrasound-guided single-injection paravertebral block with either 0.5% ropivacaine (20 mL) or a mixture of 1.3% liposomal bupivacaine (10 mL) and 0.5% standard bupivacaine (10 mL). The primary outcome was cumulative postoperative opioid consumption throughout the hospitalization, delivered via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and converted to oral morphine milligram equivalents. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, time to first PCA request, postoperative adverse events, and length of stay. Propensity score matching (1:2) was performed to balance baseline clinical and intraoperative characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 492 eligible patients, 331 received ropivacaine and 161 received liposomal bupivacaine/bupivacaine combination. After matching, 210 and 108 patients were included in the ropivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine groups, respectively. The median cumulative postoperative opioid consumption was lower in the liposomal bupivacaine group (92.1 mg [IQR, 59.1-122.3]) than in the ropivacaine group (226.2 mg [IQR, 170.2-260.0]), with a median difference of 128.2 mg (95% CI, 111.0-143.9; <i>P</i> < 0.001). The liposomal bupivacaine group was also associated with lower resting and movement pain scores at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively, a longer time to first PCA press (26.0 vs. 6.0 hours; <i>P</i> < 0.001), and a lower incidence of postoperative dizziness (21.3% vs. 34.3%; <i>P</i> = 0.017).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, preoperative single-injection paravertebral blockade with liposomal bupivacaine/bupivacaine mixture was associated with lower cumulative postoperative opioid consumption and lower early postoperative pain scores than ropivacaine.</p>","PeriodicalId":11290,"journal":{"name":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","volume":"20 ","pages":"642610"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13656937/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S642610","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effect of preoperative single-injection paravertebral block using liposomal bupivacaine/bupivacaine mixture versus ropivacaine on cumulative postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing thoracic surgery.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients who underwent elective single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (wedge resection, segmentectomy, or lobectomy) between January 2024 and February 2026. Patients received an ultrasound-guided single-injection paravertebral block with either 0.5% ropivacaine (20 mL) or a mixture of 1.3% liposomal bupivacaine (10 mL) and 0.5% standard bupivacaine (10 mL). The primary outcome was cumulative postoperative opioid consumption throughout the hospitalization, delivered via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and converted to oral morphine milligram equivalents. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, time to first PCA request, postoperative adverse events, and length of stay. Propensity score matching (1:2) was performed to balance baseline clinical and intraoperative characteristics.
Results: Among 492 eligible patients, 331 received ropivacaine and 161 received liposomal bupivacaine/bupivacaine combination. After matching, 210 and 108 patients were included in the ropivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine groups, respectively. The median cumulative postoperative opioid consumption was lower in the liposomal bupivacaine group (92.1 mg [IQR, 59.1-122.3]) than in the ropivacaine group (226.2 mg [IQR, 170.2-260.0]), with a median difference of 128.2 mg (95% CI, 111.0-143.9; P < 0.001). The liposomal bupivacaine group was also associated with lower resting and movement pain scores at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively, a longer time to first PCA press (26.0 vs. 6.0 hours; P < 0.001), and a lower incidence of postoperative dizziness (21.3% vs. 34.3%; P = 0.017).
Conclusion: For patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, preoperative single-injection paravertebral blockade with liposomal bupivacaine/bupivacaine mixture was associated with lower cumulative postoperative opioid consumption and lower early postoperative pain scores than ropivacaine.
期刊介绍:
Drug Design, Development and Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that spans the spectrum of drug design, discovery and development through to clinical applications.
The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of high-quality original research, reviews, expert opinions, commentary and clinical studies in all therapeutic areas.
Specific topics covered by the journal include:
Drug target identification and validation
Phenotypic screening and target deconvolution
Biochemical analyses of drug targets and their pathways
New methods or relevant applications in molecular/drug design and computer-aided drug discovery*
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel biologically active compounds (including diagnostics or chemical probes)
Structural or molecular biological studies elucidating molecular recognition processes
Fragment-based drug discovery
Pharmaceutical/red biotechnology
Isolation, structural characterization, (bio)synthesis, bioengineering and pharmacological evaluation of natural products**
Distribution, pharmacokinetics and metabolic transformations of drugs or biologically active compounds in drug development
Drug delivery and formulation (design and characterization of dosage forms, release mechanisms and in vivo testing)
Preclinical development studies
Translational animal models
Mechanisms of action and signalling pathways
Toxicology
Gene therapy, cell therapy and immunotherapy
Personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics
Clinical drug evaluation
Patient safety and sustained use of medicines.