Liposomal Bupivacaine Combined with Bupivacaine vs Ropivacaine for Paravertebral Blockade in Single-Port Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Propensity-Matched Comparison of Postoperative Opioid Use.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Drug Design, Development and Therapy Pub Date : 2026-10-08 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/DDDT.S642610
Wenchuan Guan, Guanyu Yang, Jing Sang, Liumei Li, Qinjun Chu
{"title":"Liposomal Bupivacaine Combined with Bupivacaine vs Ropivacaine for Paravertebral Blockade in Single-Port Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Propensity-Matched Comparison of Postoperative Opioid Use.","authors":"Wenchuan Guan, Guanyu Yang, Jing Sang, Liumei Li, Qinjun Chu","doi":"10.2147/DDDT.S642610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effect of preoperative single-injection paravertebral block using liposomal bupivacaine/bupivacaine mixture versus ropivacaine on cumulative postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing thoracic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included adult patients who underwent elective single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (wedge resection, segmentectomy, or lobectomy) between January 2024 and February 2026. Patients received an ultrasound-guided single-injection paravertebral block with either 0.5% ropivacaine (20 mL) or a mixture of 1.3% liposomal bupivacaine (10 mL) and 0.5% standard bupivacaine (10 mL). The primary outcome was cumulative postoperative opioid consumption throughout the hospitalization, delivered via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and converted to oral morphine milligram equivalents. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, time to first PCA request, postoperative adverse events, and length of stay. Propensity score matching (1:2) was performed to balance baseline clinical and intraoperative characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 492 eligible patients, 331 received ropivacaine and 161 received liposomal bupivacaine/bupivacaine combination. After matching, 210 and 108 patients were included in the ropivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine groups, respectively. The median cumulative postoperative opioid consumption was lower in the liposomal bupivacaine group (92.1 mg [IQR, 59.1-122.3]) than in the ropivacaine group (226.2 mg [IQR, 170.2-260.0]), with a median difference of 128.2 mg (95% CI, 111.0-143.9; <i>P</i> < 0.001). The liposomal bupivacaine group was also associated with lower resting and movement pain scores at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively, a longer time to first PCA press (26.0 vs. 6.0 hours; <i>P</i> < 0.001), and a lower incidence of postoperative dizziness (21.3% vs. 34.3%; <i>P</i> = 0.017).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, preoperative single-injection paravertebral blockade with liposomal bupivacaine/bupivacaine mixture was associated with lower cumulative postoperative opioid consumption and lower early postoperative pain scores than ropivacaine.</p>","PeriodicalId":11290,"journal":{"name":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","volume":"20 ","pages":"642610"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13656937/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S642610","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effect of preoperative single-injection paravertebral block using liposomal bupivacaine/bupivacaine mixture versus ropivacaine on cumulative postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing thoracic surgery.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients who underwent elective single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (wedge resection, segmentectomy, or lobectomy) between January 2024 and February 2026. Patients received an ultrasound-guided single-injection paravertebral block with either 0.5% ropivacaine (20 mL) or a mixture of 1.3% liposomal bupivacaine (10 mL) and 0.5% standard bupivacaine (10 mL). The primary outcome was cumulative postoperative opioid consumption throughout the hospitalization, delivered via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and converted to oral morphine milligram equivalents. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, time to first PCA request, postoperative adverse events, and length of stay. Propensity score matching (1:2) was performed to balance baseline clinical and intraoperative characteristics.

Results: Among 492 eligible patients, 331 received ropivacaine and 161 received liposomal bupivacaine/bupivacaine combination. After matching, 210 and 108 patients were included in the ropivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine groups, respectively. The median cumulative postoperative opioid consumption was lower in the liposomal bupivacaine group (92.1 mg [IQR, 59.1-122.3]) than in the ropivacaine group (226.2 mg [IQR, 170.2-260.0]), with a median difference of 128.2 mg (95% CI, 111.0-143.9; P < 0.001). The liposomal bupivacaine group was also associated with lower resting and movement pain scores at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively, a longer time to first PCA press (26.0 vs. 6.0 hours; P < 0.001), and a lower incidence of postoperative dizziness (21.3% vs. 34.3%; P = 0.017).

Conclusion: For patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, preoperative single-injection paravertebral blockade with liposomal bupivacaine/bupivacaine mixture was associated with lower cumulative postoperative opioid consumption and lower early postoperative pain scores than ropivacaine.

布比卡因脂质体联合布比卡因与罗哌卡因用于单孔胸腔镜手术椎旁阻断:术后阿片类药物使用的倾向匹配比较
目的:比较术前单次注射布比卡因/布比卡因混合脂质体椎旁阻滞与罗哌卡因对胸外科手术患者术后阿片类药物累积消耗的影响。方法:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2024年1月至2026年2月期间接受选择性单孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术(楔形切除术、节段切除术或肺叶切除术)的成年患者。患者接受超声引导下单次注射椎旁阻滞,0.5%罗哌卡因(20ml)或1.3%布比卡因脂质体(10ml)和0.5%标准布比卡因(10ml)的混合物。主要终点是整个住院期间的累计术后阿片类药物消耗,通过患者控制镇痛(PCA)传递并转换为口服吗啡毫克当量。次要结果包括疼痛评分、首次PCA请求的时间、术后不良事件和住院时间。进行倾向评分匹配(1:2)以平衡基线临床和术中特征。结果:492例符合条件的患者中,331例接受罗哌卡因治疗,161例接受布比卡因/布比卡因联合脂质体治疗。配对后,罗哌卡因组210例,布比卡因脂质体组108例。布比卡因脂质体组术后阿片类药物累积用量中位数(92.1 mg [IQR, 59.1-122.3])低于罗哌卡因组(226.2 mg [IQR, 170.2-260.0]),中位数差异为128.2 mg (95% CI, 111.0-143.9; P < 0.001)。布比卡因脂质体组术后24小时和48小时静息和运动疼痛评分较低,首次按压PCA的时间较长(26.0比6.0小时,P < 0.001),术后头晕发生率较低(21.3%比34.3%,P = 0.017)。结论:对于接受电视胸腔镜手术的患者,术前单次注射布比卡因/布比卡因混合脂质体椎旁阻断术与罗哌卡因相比,术后阿片类药物累积消耗更低,术后早期疼痛评分更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug Design, Development and Therapy
Drug Design, Development and Therapy CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
382
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drug Design, Development and Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that spans the spectrum of drug design, discovery and development through to clinical applications. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of high-quality original research, reviews, expert opinions, commentary and clinical studies in all therapeutic areas. Specific topics covered by the journal include: Drug target identification and validation Phenotypic screening and target deconvolution Biochemical analyses of drug targets and their pathways New methods or relevant applications in molecular/drug design and computer-aided drug discovery* Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel biologically active compounds (including diagnostics or chemical probes) Structural or molecular biological studies elucidating molecular recognition processes Fragment-based drug discovery Pharmaceutical/red biotechnology Isolation, structural characterization, (bio)synthesis, bioengineering and pharmacological evaluation of natural products** Distribution, pharmacokinetics and metabolic transformations of drugs or biologically active compounds in drug development Drug delivery and formulation (design and characterization of dosage forms, release mechanisms and in vivo testing) Preclinical development studies Translational animal models Mechanisms of action and signalling pathways Toxicology Gene therapy, cell therapy and immunotherapy Personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics Clinical drug evaluation Patient safety and sustained use of medicines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书