Strain-Based Assessment of Post-TAVR Left Bundle Branch Block in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Using Patient-Specific Computational Modeling.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Salwa Anam, Brandon Kovarovic, Puja Parikh, Ashraf Hamdan, Rami Haj-Ali, Danny Bluestein
{"title":"Strain-Based Assessment of Post-TAVR Left Bundle Branch Block in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Using Patient-Specific Computational Modeling.","authors":"Salwa Anam, Brandon Kovarovic, Puja Parikh, Ashraf Hamdan, Rami Haj-Ali, Danny Bluestein","doi":"10.1007/s10439-026-04399-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) left bundle branch block (LBBB) is the most common post-TAVR cardiac conduction abnormality (CCA), particularly in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). Prior computational studies evaluated generalized CCA risk but did not quantify LBBB-specific mechanical injury or compare self-expanding (SE) and balloon-expandable (BE) devices in BAV. This proof-of-concept study established a patient-specific computational framework to (1) quantify mechanical stretch in the left bundle branch (LBB)-adjacent region, (2) identify a preliminary, cohort-specific strain-based separation value associated with post-TAVR LBBB, and (3) compare device-related LBBB risk trends between SE and BE devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cardiac CT scans from six type I BAV TAVR patients were analyzed (two with LBBB and four without CCA). Patient-specific finite element models incorporated anatomy and leaflet calcification. The LBB region was defined using membranous septum length and anatomical landmarks. Simulations reproduced implantation of deployed SE devices and virtual BE devices at standardized depth. Area-weighted logarithmic strain (LE), contact pressure, oversizing index, eccentricity index, and expansion metrics were computed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LBB-adjacent LE showed clear separation (0.15-0.24 in LBBB vs. 0.03-0.11 without CCA), with 0.11 as a preliminary cohort-specific separation value. Mean LE was higher with SE than BE devices (0.11 vs. 0.08). Contact pressure showed no consistent association with outcome, suggesting that LE differences reflect multiple contributing factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this six-patient cohort, LBB-adjacent strain clearly separated LBBB from No-LBBB cases, whereas contact pressure showed no consistent relationship with outcome. Larger cohorts and sensitivity analyses are needed to establish its clinical utility for BAV TAVR risk stratification or device selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":7986,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-026-04399-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) left bundle branch block (LBBB) is the most common post-TAVR cardiac conduction abnormality (CCA), particularly in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). Prior computational studies evaluated generalized CCA risk but did not quantify LBBB-specific mechanical injury or compare self-expanding (SE) and balloon-expandable (BE) devices in BAV. This proof-of-concept study established a patient-specific computational framework to (1) quantify mechanical stretch in the left bundle branch (LBB)-adjacent region, (2) identify a preliminary, cohort-specific strain-based separation value associated with post-TAVR LBBB, and (3) compare device-related LBBB risk trends between SE and BE devices.

Methods: Cardiac CT scans from six type I BAV TAVR patients were analyzed (two with LBBB and four without CCA). Patient-specific finite element models incorporated anatomy and leaflet calcification. The LBB region was defined using membranous septum length and anatomical landmarks. Simulations reproduced implantation of deployed SE devices and virtual BE devices at standardized depth. Area-weighted logarithmic strain (LE), contact pressure, oversizing index, eccentricity index, and expansion metrics were computed.

Results: LBB-adjacent LE showed clear separation (0.15-0.24 in LBBB vs. 0.03-0.11 without CCA), with 0.11 as a preliminary cohort-specific separation value. Mean LE was higher with SE than BE devices (0.11 vs. 0.08). Contact pressure showed no consistent association with outcome, suggesting that LE differences reflect multiple contributing factors.

Conclusion: In this six-patient cohort, LBB-adjacent strain clearly separated LBBB from No-LBBB cases, whereas contact pressure showed no consistent relationship with outcome. Larger cohorts and sensitivity analyses are needed to establish its clinical utility for BAV TAVR risk stratification or device selection.

以评估Post-TAVR左束支阻滞在二叶主动脉瓣使用特定的计算模型。
目的:经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)是TAVR后最常见的心脏传导异常(CCA),尤其是在二尖瓣主动脉瓣(BAV)中。先前的计算研究评估了广义CCA风险,但没有量化lbbb特异性机械损伤,也没有比较BAV中的自膨胀装置(SE)和气球膨胀装置(BE)。这项概念验证研究建立了一个患者特异性的计算框架,以(1)量化左束支(LBB)邻近区域的机械拉伸,(2)确定与tavr后LBBB相关的初步、基于队列特异性应变的分离值,以及(3)比较SE和BE设备之间与设备相关的LBBB风险趋势。方法:分析6例I型BAV TAVR患者(2例合并LBBB, 4例未合并CCA)的心脏CT扫描。患者特定的有限元模型纳入解剖和小叶钙化。使用膜间隔长度和解剖标志来确定LBB区域。模拟再现了在标准深度部署的SE设备和虚拟BE设备的植入。计算了面积加权对数应变(LE)、接触压力、过大指数、偏心指数和膨胀指标。结果:LBBB邻近LE明显分离(LBBB为0.15-0.24,无CCA为0.03-0.11),初步队列特异性分离值为0.11。SE组的平均LE高于BE组(0.11 vs. 0.08)。接触压力与结果没有一致的关联,表明LE差异反映了多种因素。结论:在这6例患者队列中,lbb邻近菌株明显区分了LBBB和非LBBB病例,而接触压力与结果没有一致的关系。需要更大的队列和敏感性分析来确定其在BAV TAVR风险分层或设备选择方面的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Annals of Biomedical Engineering 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.80%
发文量
212
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Biomedical Engineering is an official journal of the Biomedical Engineering Society, publishing original articles in the major fields of bioengineering and biomedical engineering. The Annals is an interdisciplinary and international journal with the aim to highlight integrated approaches to the solutions of biological and biomedical problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书